The purpose of this study was to systematically develop an instrument to measure computer aversion, computer attitudes, and computer familiarity. The study is an extension of previous research (Schulenberg, 2002). Development involved item generation, pilot testing, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The measure was administered to psychology students drawn from two universities (N = 854; N = 400, respectively). The three hypothesized factors emerged, as well as an additional computer aversion factor. The measure possesses good content validity and factorial validity, as well as solid internal consistency reliability. Implications of this study, considerations, and directions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CattellR. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
2.
CohenB. A., & WaughG. W. (1989). Assessing computer anxiety. Psychological Reports, 65, 735–738.
3.
ComreyA. L., & LeeH. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
DignonA. M. (1996). Acceptability of a computer-administered psychiatric interview. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 177–191.
5.
DimockP. H., & CormierP. (1991). The effects of format differences and computer experience on performance and anxiety on a computer-administered test. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 119–126.
6.
DyckJ. L.GeeN. R., & SmitherJ. A. (1998). The changing construct of computer anxiety for younger and older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 61–77.
7.
DyckJ. L., & SmitherJ. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 239–248.
8.
FariñaF.ArceR.SobralJ., & CaramesR. (1991). Predictors of anxiety towards computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 263–267.
9.
FloydF. J., & WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
10.
FordB. D.VitelliR., & StucklessN. (1996). The effects of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of anger and revenge with an inmate population. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 159–166.
11.
GeorgeC. E.LankfordJ. S., & WilsonS. E. (1992). The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 203–209.
12.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
GuttmanL. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–161.
14.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G., & ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.
15.
HeinssenR. K.GlassC. R., & KnightL. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49–59.
16.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
17.
KaiserH. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.
18.
KayR. H. (1989). A practical and theoretical approach to assessing computer attitudes: The Computer Attitude Measure (CAM). Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21, 456–463.
19.
LaLomiaM. J., & SidowskiJ. B. (1991). Measurements of computer attitudes: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 171–197.
20.
LaLomiaM. J., & SidowskiJ. B. (1993). Measurements of computer anxiety: A review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 239–266.
21.
LoydB. H., & GressardC. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501–505.
22.
MarcoulidesG. A. (1988). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 151–158.
23.
MarcoulidesG. A. (1989). Measuring computer anxiety: The Computer Anxiety Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 733–739.
24.
MarcoulidesG. A.MayesB. T., & WisemanR. L. (1995). Measuring computer anxiety in the work environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 804–810.
25.
MeierS. T. (1988). Predicting individual differences in performance on computer-administered tests and tasks: Development of the Computer Aversion Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 175–187.
26.
NasserF., & WisenbakerJ. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729–757.
27.
NelsonL. J.WieseG. M., & CooperJ. (1991). Getting started with computers: Experience, anxiety, and relational style. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 185–202.
28.
NickellG. S., & PintoJ. N. (1986). The Computer Attitude Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 301–306.
29.
NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
OmarM. H. (1992). Attitudes of college students towards computers: A comparative study in the United States and the Middle East. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 249–257.
31.
PetersonL.JohannssonV., & CarlssonS. G. (1996). Computerized testing in a hospital setting: Psychometric and psychological effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 339–350.
32.
PotoskyD., & BobkoP. (1998). The Computer Understanding and Experience Scale: A self-report measure of computer experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 337–348.
33.
RosenL. D., & MaguireP. (1990). Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis. Anxiety Research, 3, 175–191.
34.
RosenL. D.SearsD. C., & WeilM. M. (1987). Computerphobia. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 167–179.
35.
SchulenbergS. E. (2002). The development of the Computer Aversion, Attitudes, and Familiarity Index (CAAFI).UMI (UMI Number 3037841): Ann Arbor, Michigan.
36.
SchulenbergS. E., & YutrzenkaB. A. (1999). The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: Implications for measures of negative affect. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 315–321.
37.
SchulenbergS. E., & YutrzenkaB. A. (2001). Equivalence of the computerized and conventional versions of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Current Psychology, 20, 216–230.
38.
SchulenbergS. E., & YutrzenkaB. A. (2004). Ethical issues in the use of computerized assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 477–490.
39.
SigurdssonJ. F. (1991). Computer experience, attitudes toward computers and personality characteristics in psychology undergraduates. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 617–624.
40.
SpinhovenP.LabbeM. R., & RomboutsR. (1993). Feasibility of computerized psychological testing with psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 440–447.
41.
SzajnaB. (1994). An investigation of the predictive validity of computer anxiety and computer aptitude. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 926–934.
42.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
43.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
VogtW. P. (1999). Dictionary of statistics & methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
WassermanJ. D., & BrackenB. A. (2003). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In GrahamJ. R. & NaglieriJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume-10 Assessment psychology (pp. 43–66). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
WeilM. M., & RosenL. D. (1995). The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 95–133.
