One way to resolve some of the conflict in English studies and technical communication over their diminishing cultural capital is to recognize the place of instrumental discourse in communication studies. Instrumental discourse is individually verified social agreements to coordinate and control physical actions. One purpose of literary works is to voice new concerns about social inequities. A purpose of rhetoric is to persuade others of the validity of those concerns. Instrumental discourse registers agreements about those concerns and brings them to temporary closure in laws, instructions, contracts, and constitutions. Instrumental discourse is the culmination of a process that often begins with a literary monolog, is continued in many rhetorical dialogs, and ends, for a while, in a chorus of approval. Each phase of this communication process—monolog, dialog, and chorus—has a place in English studies. If more English studies faculty would recognize the need to study the communications that promote dissensus and consensus, then they might contribute more to global discussions about social justice, cooperation, and sustainability, and they might gain more cultural capital and social influence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlinJ. A., Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures, NCTE, Urbana, Illinois, 1996.
2.
BérubéM., The Employment of English, New York University Press, New York, 1998.
3.
BrantlingerP., Who Killed Shakespeare?Routledge, New York, 2001.
4.
NelsonC., Manifesto of a Tenured Radical, New York University Press, New York, 1997.
5.
NorthS. M., Refiguring the Ph.D. in English Studies, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, 2000.
6.
ScholesR., The Rise and Fall of English, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998.
7.
FittsK. and LalickerW. B., Invisible Hands: A Manifesto to Resolve Institutional and Curricular Hierarchy in English Studies, College English, 66: 4, pp. 427–451, 2004.
8.
DevittA. J., Integrating Rhetorical and Literary Theories of Genre, College English, 62: 6, pp. 696–718, 2000.
9.
CullerJ., Imagining the Coherence of the English Major, in Profession 2003, Modern Language Association, pp. 85–93, 2003.
10.
ZebroskiJ. T., Composition and Rhetoric, Inc.: Life After the English Department at Syracuse University, in Beyond English, Inc., DowningD. B.HurlbertC. M., and MathieuP. (eds.), Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, pp. 164–180, 2002.
11.
MirelB. and SpilkaR., Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2002.
12.
Johnson-EilolaJ. and SelberS. A., Central Works in Technical Communication, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
13.
SavageG. J., Introduction: Toward Professional Status in Technical Communication, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 1, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing, Amityville, New York, pp. 1–12, 2003.
14.
DickinsonE., The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson, JohnsonThomas H. (ed.), Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1952.
15.
TennysonA., Ulysses, in The Norton Anthology of English Literature, Vol. 2, Fifth Edition, AbramsM. H. (ed.), W. W. Norton, New York, 1986.
16.
JoyceJ., The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Viking Press, New York, 1964.
17.
ShelleyP. B., A Defence of Poetry, in Criticism: The Major Texts, BateW. J. (ed.), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, pp. 429–435, 1970.
18.
MillerC., Comment [on Instrumental Discourse is as Humanistic as Rhetoric], Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10: 4, pp. 482–486, 1996.
19.
JohnsonR., Complicating Technology: Interdisciplinary Method, the Burden of Comprehension, and the Ethical Space of the Technical Communicator, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7: 1, pp. 75–98, 1998.
20.
SelberS. A., The Social Formation of Technical Communication Studies, Review Article, College Composition and Communication, 50: 2, pp. 263–276, 1998.
21.
SpellmeyerK., Common Ground: Dialogue, Understanding, and the Teaching of Composition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1993.
22.
SavageG. J., Tricksters, Fools, and Sophists: Technical Communication as Postmodern Rhetoric, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, Vol. 2, Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood Publishing, Amityville, New York, pp. 167–193, 2004.
23.
DurstR. K., Collision Course: Conflict, Negotiation, and Learning in College Composition, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, 1999.
24.
RentzK., A Flare from the Margins: The Place of Professional Writing in English Departments, Pedagogy, 1: 1, pp. 185–190, 2001.
25.
SpellmeyerK., Bigger than a Discipline? in A Field of Dreams, O'NeillP.CrowA.BurtonL. W. (eds.), Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, pp. 278–294, 2002.
26.
BealeW., A Pragmatic Theory of Rhetoric, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 1987.
27.
HayekF. A., The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.
28.
ToulminS.RiekeR. and JanikA., An Introduction to Reasoning, Second Ed., Macmillan, New York, 1984.
29.
CrystalD., The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
30.
LovasJ. C., How Did We Get in This Fix? A Personal Account of the Shift to a Part-Time Faculty in a Leading Two-Year College District, in Moving a Mountain, SchellE. E. and StockP. L. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 196–217, 2001.
31.
Aristotle, Rhetoric and Poetics, Trans. RobertsRhys W., Modern Library, New York, 1954.
32.
BernhardtS. A., The Shape of Text to Come: The Texture of Print on Screens, College Composition and Communication, 44: 2, pp. 151–175, 1993.
33.
MillerC., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40: 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.
34.
PolanyiM., Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958.
35.
GriceH. P., Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989.
36.
WrightR., Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, Vintage Books, New York, 2000.
37.
KentT., Introduction, in Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm, KentT. (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 1–6, 1999.
38.
MooreP., Myths about Instrumental Discourse, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8: 2, pp. 210–223, 1999.
39.
BourdieuP., Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Trans. NiceR., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
40.
SullivanD. L., Political-Ethical Implications of Defining Technical Communication as a Practice, Journal of Advanced Composition, 10: 2, pp. 375–386, 1990.
41.
MillerT. P., Treating Professional Writing as Social Praxis, Journal of Advanced Composition, 11: 1, pp. 57–72, 1991.
42.
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on the Professionalization of PhDs, Professionalization in Perspective, in Profession 2002, Modern Language Association, New York, pp. 187–210, 2002.
43.
FogelR. W., The Fourth Great Awakening & The Future of Egalitarianism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000.
44.
FriedmanM., Capitalism and Freedom, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.
45.
SegalJ.ParéA.BrentD.VipondD., The Researcher as Missionary: Problems with Rhetoric and Reform in the Disciplines, College Composition and Communication, 50: 1, pp. 71–90, 1998.
46.
SoyferV. N., Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science, Trans. GruliowL. and GruliowR., Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1994.
47.
Johnson-EilolaJ., Wild Technologies: Computer Use and Social Possibility, in Computers and Technical Communication: Pedagogical and Programmatic Perspectives, SelberS. A. (ed.), Ablex Publishing, Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 97–128, 1997.
48.
AlonsoC. J., Editor's Column: Position Paper, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 117: 2, pp. 201–206, 2002.
49.
MillerR. E., As If Learning Mattered, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1998.
50.
HindmanJ. E., Learning as We G(r)o(w): Strategizing the Lessons of a Fledgling Rhetoric and Writing Department, in A Field of Dreams, O'NeillP.CrowA., and BurtonL. W. (eds.), Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, pp. 107–129, 2002.
51.
RikerW. H., The Art of Political Manipulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1986.
52.
SchellE. E. and StockP. L., Moving a Mountain, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 196–217, 2001.
53.
O'NeillP.CrowA, and BurtonL. W. (eds.), A Field of Dreams, Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, 2002.
54.
DowningD. B.HurlbertC. M., and MathieuP., Beyond English, Inc., Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 2002.
55.
TingleN. and KirschtJ., A Place to Stand: The Role of Unions in the Development of Writing Programs, in Moving a Mountain, SchellE. E. and StockP. L. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 218–232, 2001.
56.
GuilloryJ., Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1993.
57.
MenandL., College: The End of the Golden Age, The New York Review of Books, pp. 44–47, October 18, 2001.
58.
ADE Ad Hoc Committee on the English Major, The Undergraduate English Major, ADE Bulletin, pp. 68–91, Spring-Fall 2003.
59.
RischardJ. F., High Noon: Twenty Global Problems, Twenty Years to Solve Them, Basic Books, New York, 2002.
60.
GiddensA., The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Malden, Massachusetts, 1998.
61.
MoorePatrick, and KrethMelinda, From Wordsmith to Communication Strategist: Heresthetic and Political Maneuvering in Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 52(3), 2005.
62.
MoorePatrick, From Cultural Capitalism to Entrepreneurial Humanism: Understanding and Reevaluating Critical Theory, in Market Matters: Applied Rhetoric Studies and Free Market Competition, CarterLocke (ed.), Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, pp. 53–76, 2005.
63.
MoorePatrick, Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's ‘Ethic of Expediency,’Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 54(1–2), 2004.
64.
MoorePatrick, Rethinking the Idea of Profit in Professional Communication and Cultural Capitalism, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(2), 2004.
65.
MoorePatrick, Evolving Paradigms of Communication Analysis: A Defense of Teaching Software Programs in Technical Communication Classes, TEXT Technology, Winter 2001.
66.
MoorePatrick, When Persuasion Fails: Coping with Power Struggles, Technical Communication, 46(3), 1999.
