Though the claim that the golden section has special aesthetic value is a very general one, till now it has been tested only for a very small number of different shapes, most research being restricted to the golden rectangle. An experiment is reported in which the way golden ratios are implemented in sides of objects is varied, producing a variety of shapes. It was found that the golden section does not have a special aesthetic quality as compared to the ratio 1.8.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjafieldJ. (1985). A review of recent research on the golden section. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 117–134.
2.
BerlyneD. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3.
BoselieF. (1984). The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section. Psychological Research, 45, 367–375.
4.
BoselieF. (1992). The golden section has no special aesthetic attractivity!Empirical Studies of the Arts, 10, 1–18.
5.
BoselieF., and LeeuwenbergE. (1986). A test of the minimum principle requires a perceptual coding system. Perception, 15, 331–354.
6.
BouleauC. (1963/1980). The painter's secret geometry, A study of composition in art.New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
7.
FechnerG. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
8.
HochbergJ. (1978). Art and perception. In: CarteretteE. and FriedmanM. (Eds.), Handbook of Perception (Vol. X, pp. 225–258). New York: Academic Press.
9.
von Naredi-RainerP. (1982). Architektur und Harmonie. Zahl, Mass und Proportion in der abendländischen Baukunst. Köln: Dumont.
