Home care work in metropolitan areas is a source of employment for immigrant women of color. Service work of this type intertwines domestic and caring labor in ways that reinforce the historically gendered and racialized nature of the work. Such macro level economic and political issues are played out at the micro level of daily service provided within elderly clients' homes. A study of these processes in home care work was carried out in urban southern Ontario in two nonprofit home care agencies. In-depth interviews and focus groups held with visible minority home care workers suggested that workers deal daily with racist attitudes and behaviors from clients and their families; agencies recognize these oppressive processes but usually handle them on a case-by-case basis through supervisors; and home care workers handle racism on the job as they do in their off-work hours—by avoidance, situating incidents within an analysis of the circumstances of elderly clients, setting boundaries on discussions, and occasionally, confrontation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjaminA. E.An historical perspective on home care policy. Milbank Q. 71(1): 129–166, 1993.
2.
SzaszA.The labor impacts of policy changes in home care; how federal policy transformed home health organizations and their labor practices. J. Health Polit. Policy Law15: 191–210, 1990.
3.
BurbridgeL.The labor market for home care workers: Demand, supply and institutional barriers. Gerontologist33(1): 41–46, 1993.
4.
EstesC.The Long Term Care Crisis: Elders Trapped in the No-Care Zone. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1993.
5.
KenneyG.How access to long-term care affects home health transfers. J. Health Polit. Policy Law18(4): 937–965, 1993.
6.
MacAdamM.Home care reimbursement and effects on personnel. Gerontologist33(1): 55–63, 1993.
7.
DaatlandS.Recent trends and future prospects for the elderly in Scandinavia. J. Aging Soc. Policy6(1/2): 181–197, 1994.
8.
Special issue on policy issues in care for the elderly in Canada. Rev. Can. Vieille-ment/Can. J. Aging14(2): 153–446, 1995.
9.
EversA.van der ZandenG. (eds.). Better Care for Dependent People Living at Home: Meeting the New Agenda in Services for the Elderly. Netherlands Institute of Gerontology, Bunnick, The Netherlands, 1993.
10.
KraanR.EversA. (eds.). Care for the Elderly: Significant Innovations in Three European Countries. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., 1991.
11.
LesemannF.MartinC.Home-Based Care, the Elderly, the Family and the Welfare State: An International Comparison. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, 1993.
12.
WistowG.HenwoodM.Caring for people: Elegant model or flawed design. In Social Policy Review 1990–91, edited by ManningN., pp. 78–100. The Longman Group, Harlow, Essex, 1991.
13.
ApplebaumR.McGinnisR.What price quality? Assuring the quality of case managed in-home care. J. Case Manage. 1(1): 9–13, 1992.
14.
EustisN.KaneR.FischerL.Home care quality and the home care worker: Beyond quality assurance as usual. Gerontologist33(1): 64–73, 1993.
15.
FeldmanP.Work improvements for home care workers: Impact and feasibility. Gerontologist33(1): 47–54, 1993.
16.
KaneR.CaplanA. (eds.). Ethical Conflicts in the Management of Home Care: The Case Manager's Dilemma. Springer Publishing, New York, 1993.
17.
KramerA.Assessing and assuring the quality of home health care: A conceptual framework. Milbank Q. 68(3): 413–443, 1990.
18.
SchmidH.HasenfieldY.Organizational dilemmas in the provision of home-care services. Soc. Serv. Rev.67: 40–54, 1993.
19.
BartoldusE.IlleryB.SturgesP. J.Job-related stress and coping among home care workers with elderly people. Health Soc. Work, August 1989, pp. 204–210.
20.
EustisN. N.FischerL. R.Relationship between home care clients and their workers: Implications for quality of care. Gerontologist31(4): 447–456, 1991.
21.
KayeL. W.Worker views of the intensity of affective expression during the delivery of home care services for the elderly. Home Care Serv. Q.7: 41–54, 1986.
22.
MercerS.HeacockP.BeckC.Nurses aides in nursing homes: A study of caregivers. J Women Aging6(1/2): 107–121, 1994.
23.
WarrenL.We're home helps because we care: The experience of home helps caring for elderly people. In New Directions in the Sociology of Health, edited by AbbottP.PayneG., pp. 70–86. Falmer Press, London, 1990.
24.
AbelE.Family care of the frail elderly. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives, edited by AbelE.NelsonM., pp. 65–91. The State University of New York, Albany, 1990.
25.
DwyerJ.CowardR.Gender, Families and Elder Care. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1992.
26.
LewisJ.MeredithB.Daughters Who Care. Routledge, London and New York, 1988.
27.
BoydM.Gender, visible minority and immigrant earnings inequality: Reassessing an employment equity premise. In Deconstructing a Nation: Immigration, Multiculturalism and Racism in ‘90s Canada, edited by SatzewichV., pp. 279–321. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1992.
28.
FonerN.The Caregiving Dilemma: Work in An American Nursing Home. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1994.
29.
AnthiasF.Yuval-DavisN. (with Cain, H.). Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle. Routledge, London and New York, 1992.
30.
BorisE.The racialized gendered state: The construction of citizenship in the United States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society2(2): 160–180, 1995.
31.
StaffordJ.The impact of the new immigration policy on racism in Canada. In Deconstructing a Nation: Immigration, Multiculturalism and Racism in ‘90s Canada, edited by SatzewichV., pp. 69–92. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1992.
32.
Arat-KocS.In the privacy of their own home: Foreign domestic workers as solution to the crisis of the domestic sphere in Canada. In Feminism in Action: Studies in Political Economy, edited by ConnellyM. P.ArmstrongP., pp. 149–174. Canadian Scholars Press, Toronto, 1992.
33.
CallisteA.Canada's immigration policy and domestics from the Caribbean: The second domestic scheme. In Race, Class, Gender, Bonds and Barriers, Ed. 2, edited by VorstJ., pp. 136–168. Garamond Press, Toronto, 1991.
34.
ColenS.“With respect to feeling”: Voices of West Indian child care and domestic workers in New York City. In All American Women: Lines that Divide, Ties that Bind, edited by ColeJ. B., pp. 3–70. Free Press, New York, 1986.
35.
DillB. T.“Making your job good yourself”: Domestic service and the construction of personal dignity. In Women and the Politics of Empowerment, edited by BookmanA.MorgenS., pp. 33–52. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1988.
36.
DonovanR.Work stress and job satisfaction: A study of home care workers in New York City. Home Health Serv. Q.10: 97–114, 1989.
37.
GlennE. N.From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs18(1): 1–43, 1992.
38.
Tellis-NayekV.Tellis-NayekM.Quality of care and the burden of two cultures: When the world of the nurse's aide enters the world of the nursing home. Gerontologist29(3): 307–313, 1989.
39.
EssedP.Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1991.
40.
AndersenM.Studying across difference: Race, class and gender in qualitative research. In Race and Ethnicity in Research Models, edited by StanfieldJ.IIDennisR., pp. 39–52. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif., 1993.
41.
CannonL.HigginbothamE.LeungM.Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. Gender and Society2(4): 449–462, 1988.
42.
De VaultM.Ethnicity and expertise: Racial-ethnic knowledge in sociological research. Gender and Society9(5): 612–631, 1995.
43.
AronsonJ.NeysmithS.“You're not just in there to do the work”: Depersonalizing policies and the exploitation of home care workers' labour. Gender and Society10(1): 59–77, 1996.
44.
NeysmithS.AronsonJ.Home care workers discuss their work: The skills required to “use our common sense.”J. Aging Stud. 10(1): 1–14, 1996.
GregsonN.LoweM.Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender and Waged Domestic Labour in Contemporary Britain. Routledge, New York and London, 1994.
47.
WalkerA.WarrenL.Changing Services for Older People. Open University Press, Buckingham and Philadelphia, 1996.
48.
DaatlandS.What are families for? On family solidarity and preference for help. Ageing and Society10: 1–15, 1990.
49.
BakanA.StasiulisD.Making the match: Agencies and the racialization of women's household work. Signs20(2): 303–335, 1995.
50.
RazackS.What is to be gained by looking white people in the eye? Culture, race, and gender in cases of sexual violence. Signs19(4): 894–923, 1994.
51.
AronsonJ.Giving consumers a say in policy development: Influencing policy or just being heard?Can. Public Policy19(4): 367–378, 1993.
52.
CarpenterM.Normality Is Hard Work: Trade Unions and the Politics of Community Care. Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1994.
53.
DaviesC.Competence versus care? Gender and caring work revisited. Acta Sociol. 38: 17–31, 1995.
54.
FisherB.TrontoJ.Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives, edited by AbelE.NelsonM., pp. 35–62. The State University of New York, Albany, 1990.
55.
GrahamH.Social divisions of caring. Women's Studies International Forum16: 461–470, 1993.
56.
JamesN.Care = organization + physical labour + emotional labour. Sociol. Health Illness14: 488–509, 1992.
57.
ThomasC.De-constructing concepts of care. Sociology27(4): 649–669, 1993.
