Cryonic Suspension and the Law

Abstract

Three central problems which adversely affect the intriguing use, development, and perfection of the cryonic suspension of individuals are analyzed: the extent to which a physician may be guilty of malpractice in assisting with a suspension – owing to present weaknesses in defining death and coordinate criminal liability attaching theretofor murder; the need for a recognition of suspension; and the present effect of the law's anachronistic treatment of estate devolution upon a cryon – or one undergoing suspension. To meet these difficulties, a partnership is proposed between law and medicine which would respond to challenges to this type of new biology in measured anticipation of the future consequences, rather than with a passive spirit of resignation to things to come.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McShane

, Hopkins Saves a Life with New Technique, Washington Post, p. Cl, col. 5, October 12, 1983.

Time, p. 71, June 22, 1981.

Newsweek, p. 8, July 7, 1980.

Newsweek, p. 8, August 16, 1976.

Smith

A. U.

(ed.), Current Trends in Cryobiology, Plenum Books, New York, 1970.

Ettinger

R. C. W.

, Man into Superman, St. Martin's Press, New York, p. 251, 1972.

Mazur

, Cryobiology: The Freezing of Biological Systems, Science, 168: 3934, pp. 939–949, 1970.

Dukeminier

Sanders

, Organ Transplantation: A Proposal for Route Salvaging of Cadaver Organs, New England Journal of Medicine, 279: 8, pp. 413, 419, 1969.

Luyet

B. J.

Gehenio

M. P.

, Life and Death at Low Temperatures, Biodynamics, Normandy, Missouri, 1940.

10.

Smith

G. P.

, Medical-Legal Aspects of Cryonics: Prospects for Immortality, Associated Faculty Press, Inc., Port Washington, New York, pp. 15–23, 1983.

11.

Smith

G. P.

, Intimations of Immortality: Clones, Cryons, and the Law, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 6: 1, pp. 119–132, 1983.

12.

Burger

W. E.

, Reflections of Law and Experimental Medicine, in Ethical, Legal, and Social Challenges to the Brave New World, 1, Smith

G. P.

(ed.), Associated Faculty Press, Inc., Port Washington, New York, pp. 211–217, 1982.

13.

Shapiro

M. H.

Spece

R. G.

Jr. , Cases, Materials, and Problems on Bioethics and Law, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota, 1981.

14.

Task Force on Death and Dying of the Institute of Society, Ethics, and Life Sciences, Refinements in Criteria for Determination of Death, Journal of the American Medical Association, 221:1, pp. 48–53, 1972.

15.

Jeddelah

N. T.

, The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act and a Statutory Definition of Death, Transplantation Proceedings, 8, Supp. No. 1, pp. 245–249, 1976.

16.

Dukeminier

, Supplying Organs for Transplantation, Michigan Law Review, 68: 5, pp. 811–866, 1970.

17.

International Comments, Declaration of Sydney, Journal of the American Medical Association, 206:2, p. 657, 1968.

18.

Minutes of the Eleventh Meeting of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medical and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Washington, D.C., p. 3, July 9, 1983.

19.

Ettinger

R. C. W.

, The Prospect of Immortality, Doubleday, New York, p. 3, 1964.

20.

Gray

J. C.

, The Rule Against Perpetuities, Little Brown & Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 1942.

21.

Schuyler

D. M.

, The New Biology and the Rule Against Perpetuities, University of California at Los Angeles Law Review, 15: 2, pp. 420–435, 1968.

22.

Anderson

(ed.), Couch Cyclopedia of Insurance Law, The Lawyers Co-Operative, New York, 1959.

23.

Smith

, Uncertainties on the Spiral Staircase: Metaethics and the New Biology, The Pharos, 41: 1, pp. 10–12, 1978.