Three models of interprofessional education appropriate for serving youth at risk for substance abuse are described. One of the models, the team case study, was evaluated by school personnel trained in its use. Results indicated that participants were more sensitive to the multiple needs of youth at risk, experienced increased comfort in seeking consultation from other agents working with such youth, and were more confident of their abilities to select and implement appropriate interventions for youth at risk for substance abuse following their training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CyphertF. R., This Issue: Interprofessional Education, Theory into Practice, 26, p. 86, 1987
2.
LyonsJ. D.CastoR. M. (eds.), The Third National Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, The National Consortium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, Columbus, Ohio, 1990
3.
HarbaughG. L.CastoR. M.Burgess-EllisonJ. A., Becoming a Professional: How Interprofessional Training Helps, Theory into Practice, 26, pp. 141145, 1987
4.
ChildsJ. M., Interprofessional Approach to Ethical Issues, Theory into Practice, 26, pp. 124128, 1987
5.
CunninghamL. L.DunnV. B., Interprofessional Policy Analysis: An Aid to Public Policy Formation, Theory into Practice, 26, pp. 129133, 1987
6.
SpencerM. H., Impact of Interprofessional Education on Subsequent Practice, Theory into Practice, 26, pp. 134140, 1987
7.
SchoorL., Within our Reach: Breaking the Cycler of Disadvantage, Doubleday, New York, 1988
8.
CunninghamL. L., Forward, in Proceedings of the Third National Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, LyonsJ. P.CastoR. M. (eds.), The National Consortium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, Columbus, Ohio, 1990
9.
LyonsJ. P. (ed.), Summary: The Third National Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, The National Consortium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 57, 1990
10.
CarolL. N., KIVA: A Leadership Initiative and Technique, in Proceedings of the Third National Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, LyonsJ. P.CastoR. M. (eds.), The National Consortium on Interprofessional Education and Practice, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 2527, 1990
11.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. F.MillerJ. Y., Risk and Protective Factors for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Implications for Substance Abuse Prevention, Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp. 64105, 1992
12.
KoeleP.HoogstraetenJ., A Method for Analyzing Designs: I. Theory, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, pp. 5154, 1988
13.
HowardG. S.DalyP. R., Response-shift Bias: A Source of Contamination of Self-report Measures, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, pp. 144150, 1979
14.
HoogstraetenJ., The Retrospective Pretest in an Educational Training Context, Journal of Experimental Education, 50, pp. 200205, 1982
15.
MelavilleA. I.BlankM. J., What It Takes: Structuring Interagency Partnerships to Connect Children and Families with Comprehensive Services, Education and Human Services Consortium, Washington, D.C., 1991