Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

For two-dimensional rectangular objects, a fundamental characteristic is the ratio of height and width. Ratios were calculated for paintings that are both high art and popular art. They show excellent agreement in both the shapes of the distributions and the medians of approximately 1.3. Ratios were calculated for two-dimensional art supplies and other objects. With some exceptions, the representative ratios for many of these objects are also close to 1.3. Two mathematical ratios are suggested. One is 4:3, found in the first Pythagorean triple, the three sides of a right triangle. The other is the plastic number studied by Richard Padovan. Although neither has the status of the golden section, either ratio would be a better candidate for describing the regularity in the proportions of rectangular objects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boyer

C. B.

(1991). A history of mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

Cahill

Gauthier

Cassou

, & Miller

D. C.

(1938). Masters of popular painting: Modern primitives of Europe and America. New York: Museum of Modern Art.

Celebonovic

(1974). Some call it kitsch: Masterpieces of bourgeois realism. New York: Abrams.

Coleman

D. C.

(1958). The British paper industry 1495–1860. London: Oxford University Press.

Conover

(1990). Graphic communications today (2nd ed.). New York: West Publishing Company.

de la Croix

, & Tansey

R. G.

(Eds.). (1986). Gardner's art through the ages (8th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Fechner

G. T.

(1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf & Härtel.

Fechner

G. T.

(1871). Zur experimentalen Aesthetik. Leipzig, Germany: Bei S. Hirzel.

Hartt

(1985). Art: A history of painting, sculpture and architecture (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

10.

Huntley

H. E.

(1970). The divine proportion: A study in mathematical beauty. New York: Dover.

11.

Janson

H. W.

(1986). History of art (3rd ed.). New York: Harry N. Abrams.

12.

McManus

I. C.

(1978). The horizontal-vertical illusion and the square. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 369–370.

13.

Myers

J. F.

(1989). The language of visual art. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

14.

Pearl Paint Company. (1994). Pearl fine arts catalog. New York: Author.

15.

Runion

G. E.

(1990). The golden section. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications.

16.

Runyon

R. P.

, & Haber

(1991). Fundamentals of behavioral statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

17.

Secord

(1992). Dog painting 1840–1940: A social history of the dog in art. Woodbridge, Suffolk, England: Antique Collectors' Club.

18.

Shortess

G. K.

, & Clarke

J. C.

(1988). Properties of a population of art works in experimental aesthetics. Visual Arts Research, 14, 1–12.

19.

Stewart

(1996, June). Tales of a neglected number. Scientific American, 102–103.

20.

The dictionary of paper (3rd ed.). (1965). New York: American Paper and Pulp Association.

21.

Toeplitz

(1963). The calculus, a genetic approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Winston

A. S.

, & Cupchik

G. C.

(1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1–14.

23.

Zettl

(1990). Sight sound motion: Applied media aesthetics (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

The Shape of Things: But Not the Golden Section

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References