Shell beads have long been a topic of interest in North American Pacific Coast archaeology. Studies by Gifford (1947), Gibson (1975, 1976, 1987, 1992), King (1974, 1978, 1990), Macko (1984), Bennyhoff and Hughes (1987), Arnold (1992a), Arnold and Munns (1994), and Arnold and Graesch (2001) have established the temporal sensitivity of shell bead assemblages in California and explored their socioeconomic importance among several groups on the coast and in the interior. Somewhat less attention has been directed toward elucidating shell bead production techniques (but see Arnold and Graesch, 2001; Macko, 1984). Here, we experiment with an often reported but unusual drilling technique attributed to the coastal Chumash, among others, for the manufacturing of Pismo clam (Tivela stultorum) tube beads. We also place Tivela stultorum bead manufacturing in a broader cultural and manufacturing context, including implementing systematic Moh's hardness testing of Tivela and nine other widely used shell species. Ethnographic, archaeological, and experimental evidence suggests that Tivela tube beads were among the most labor-intensive and valuable of the many bead types made and used by Native Californians.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldJeanne E.1987Craft Specialization in the Prehistoric Channel Islands, California, University of California Press, Berkeley. 1990 Lithic Resource Control and Economic Change in the Santa Barbara Channel Region, Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 12, pp. 158–172.
2.
ArnoldJeanne E.1992aCultural Disruption and the Political Economy in Channel Islands Prehistory, in Essays on the Prehistory of Maritime California, JonesT. (ed.), Center for Archaeological Research, Publication 10, University of California, Davis, pp. 129–144.
3.
ArnoldJeanne E.1992bComplex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California: Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Islands, American Antiquity, 57, pp. 60–84.
4.
ArnoldJeanne E. (Ed.) 2001The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
5.
ArnoldJeanne E. and GraeschAnthony P.2001The Evolution of Specialized Shellworking among the Island Chumash, in The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, ArnoldJ. E. (ed.), University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 71–112.
6.
ArnoldJeanne E. and MunnsAnn1994Independent or Attached Specialization: The Organization of Shell Bead Production in California, Journal of Field Archaeology, 21, pp. 473–489.
7.
ArnoldJeanne E.PreziosiAimee M., and ShattuckPaul2001Flaked Stone Craft Production and Exchange in Island Chumash Territory, in The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, ArnoldJ. E. (ed.), University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 113–131.
8.
BennyhoffJames A. and HughesRichard E.1987Shell Bead and Ornament Exchange Networks between California and the Western Great Basin, Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 64:2, pp. 79–175.
9.
GibsonRobert O.1975The Beads of Humaliwo, Journal of California Anthropology, 2, pp. 110–119.
10.
GibsonRobert O.1976A Study of Beads and Ornaments from the San Buenaventura Mission Site (Ven-87), in The Changing Faces of Main Street, GreenwoodR. S. (ed.), report prepared for the Redevelopment Agency, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura, California, pp. 77–166.
11.
GibsonRobert O.1987A Preliminary Study of Beads from Humaliwo, 4-LAN-264 at Malibu State Park, Los Angeles County, California, report on file (#L-3361), South Central Coastal Information Center, Fullerton, California.
12.
GibsonRobert O.1992An Introduction to the Study of Aboriginal Beads from California, Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, 28:3, pp. 1–45.
13.
GiffordEdward W.1926Clear Lake Pomo Society, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 18:2, pp. 287–390.
14.
GiffordEdward W.1947Californian Shell Artifacts, University of California Anthropological Records, 9:1, pp. 1–132.
15.
GraeschAnthony P.2000Chumash Houses, Households, and Economy: Post-Contact Production and Exchange on Santa Cruz Island, unpublished master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.
16.
GraeschAnthony P.2001Culture Contact on the Channel Islands: Historic-Era Production and Exchange Systems, in The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, ArnoldJ. E. (ed.), University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 261–285.
17.
GreenTerisa M.1999Spanish Missions and Native Religion: Contact, Conflict, and Convergence, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Archaeology Program, University of California, Los Angeles.
18.
GreenTerisa M.2002Artifact Rarity and Grave Values: Did the Chumash Symbolize Wealth in Mortuary Contexts? Paper presented at the 67th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.
19.
HaydenBrian1998Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, pp. 1–55.
20.
HudsonTravis and BlackburnThomas C.1985The Material Culture of the Chumash Interaction Sphere. Vol. III: Clothing, Ornamentation, and Grooming, Anthropological Papers 28, Ballena Press and the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Menlo Park, California.
21.
HudsonTravis and BlackburnThomas C.1987The Material Culture of the Chumash Interaction Sphere. Vol. IV: Manufacturing Processes, Metrology, and Trade, Anthropological Papers 31, Ballena Press and the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Menlo Park, California.
22.
KingChester D.1974The Explanation of Differences and Similarities among Beads Used in Prehistoric and Early Historic California, in 'Antap: California Indian Political and Economic Organization, BeanL. J. and KingT. F. (eds.), Anthropological Papers 2, Ballena Press, Ramona, California, pp. 75–92.
23.
KingChester D.1978Protohistoric and Historic Archaeology, in Handbook of North American Indians, California, Vol. 8, HeizerR. F. (ed.), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 58–68.
24.
KingChester D.1990Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used for Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region before A.D. 1804, Garland, New York.
25.
KroeberAlfred L.1925Handbook of the Indians of California, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
26.
LattaFrank F.1977Handbook of Yokuts Indians (revised edition), Bear State Books, Santa Cruz, (1949) California.
27.
LesureRichard1999On the Genesis of Value in Early Hierarchical Societies, in Material Symbols: Culture and Economy in Prehistory, RobbJ. E. (ed.), Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper 26, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 23–55.
28.
LoebE. M.1926Pomo Folkways, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 19:2, pp. 149–405.
29.
MackoMichael E.1984The Economics of Olivella biplicata Shell Bead Production and Exchange in Southern California, paper presented at the 49th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Portland, Oregon.
30.
PreziosiAimee M.2001Standardization and Specialization: The Island Chumash Microdrill Industry, in The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, ArnoldJ. E. (ed.), University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 151–163.
31.
RobinsonR. W.1987A Salvage Excavation of an Alliklik Cemetery in Green Valley, California, in Prehistory of the Antelope Valley, California: An Overview, RobinsonR. W. (ed.), Antelope Valley Archaeological Society Occasional Paper 1, Lancaster, California, pp. 25–33.
