The Relationship between Barrier Courses and Persistence in Engineering

Abstract

Attrition in engineering programs continues to be an important issue for universities across the country. This study examined the connection between student performance in barrier courses and persistence in engineering. Quantitative results showed that high school academic experience, student behaviors (including study habits, work habits, coping strategies), students' perceptions about faculty behavior (including teaching styles and the “weed-out” culture), the perceived culture of support in the engineering school, and motivation to succeed in engineering all impact students' performance in barrier courses. Qualitative results showed that motivation to succeed might be the reason why some students persist even when they “struggle” with barrier courses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

D. W.

(1988). Factors related to the persistence of men and women engineering freshmen. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1988). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, AAT, 8824705.

Adelman

(1999). The new course map and transcript files: Changes in course-taking and achievement, 1972–1993. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Astin

A. W.

(1975). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey Bass Publishers.

Augustine

(1966). Persistence and attrition of engineering students. A study of freshmen and sophomore engineering students at three midwestern universities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 014 740).

Felder

R. M.

Forrest

K. D.

Baker-Ward

Dietz

E. J.

, & Mohr

P. H.

(1993). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention I. Success and failure in the introductory courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 82(1), 15–21.

Gardner

P. D.

, & Broadus

(1990). Pursuing an engineering degree: An examination of issues pertaining to persistence in engineering. Collegiate Employment Research Institute, Michigan State University, East Lansing. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 320 500).

Levin

, & Wyckoff

(1990). Student characteristics that predict persistence and success in Baccalaureate Engineering. Pamona, NJ: National Academic Advising Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 320 497).

Moller-Wong

, & Eide

(1997). An engineering student retention study. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 7–15.

Mueller

D. F.

(1990). Intellective and non-intellective characteristics related to persistence, and attrition of engineering students (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1989). PeoQuest Dissertations and Theses, AAT 9022184.

10.

National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004 [On-line document]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/pdf/c02.pdf.

11.

Schurr

K. T.

Ellen

A. S.

, & Ruble

V. E.

(1987). Actual course difficulty as a factor in accounting for the achievement and attrition of college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1049–1054.

12.

Seymour

, & Hewitt

N. M.

(1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.