Children spend many hours of their free time “playing” computerized video games. This learner involvement may have significant educational implications. One area of impact is on the acquisition of spatial visualization skills. The general nature of spatial visualization and its educational and social relevance is presented. Skills development by student/video game interaction is also explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
VandenbergS. G., Sources of Variance in Performance of Spatial Tests, in Children's Spatial Development, EliotJ. and SalkindN. J. (eds.), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1975.
2.
PiagetJ. and InhelderB., The Child's Conception of Space, Humanities Press, New York, 1956.
3.
FrostigM.HorneD. and MillerA., Pictures and Patterns, Follet Publishing Company, Chicago, 1972.
4.
CoryC. H.RimlandB. and BrysonR. A., Using Computerized Tests to Measure New Dimensions of Abilities: An Exploratory Study, Applied Psychological Measurement, 1: 1, pp. 101–110, Winter 1977.
5.
KosslynS. M. and SchwartzS. P., A Simulation of Visual Imagery, Cognitive Science, 1, pp. 265–296, 1977.
6.
KnoxX. and KimuraD., Cerebral Processing of Nonverbal Sound in Boys and Girls, Neuropsychologia, 8, pp. 227–238, 1970.
7.
SmithI. M., Spatial Ability: Its Educational and Social Significance, Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, California, 1964.
8.
GuayR. B. and McDanielE. D., The Relationship between Mathematics Achievement and Spatial Abilities among Elementary School Children, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8, pp. 211–215, 1977.
9.
LoweryB. R.FitzgeraldV. E. and PowersP. J., “The Relationship of Gender and Spatial Visualization on Seventh Grade Mathematics Achievement,” unpublished manuscript, 1982. (Available from B. R. Lowery, 9050 Decatur Circle, San Diego, CA 92126).
10.
TalleyL. H., The Use of Three-Dimensional Visualization as a Moderator in the Higher Cognitive Learning of Concepts in College Level Chemistry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10, pp. 263–269, 1973.
11.
MartinB. L., Spatial Visualization Abilities of Prospective Mathematics Teachers, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, pp. 11–19, 1968.
12.
SiemankowskiF. T. and MacKnightF. C., Spatial Cognition: Success Prognosticator in College Science Courses, Journal of Science Teaching, 1, pp. 56–59, 1971.
13.
LevineJ. M.SchulmanD.BrahlekR. E. and FleishmanE. A., Trainability of Abilities: Training and Transfer of Spatial Visualizations, Advanced Research Resources Organization, Report No. 154-500, Washington, D.C., April 1980.
14.
FennemaE. and ShermanJ., Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization, and Affective Factors, American Educational Research Association Journal, 14: 1, pp. 57–71, Winter 1977.
15.
FreedmanR. J., “Sex Differences in Spatial Performances as Related to Cerebral Internalization,” paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, September, 1979.
16.
GuayR. B. and McDanielE. D., “Toward Explaining Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: An Investigation of Selected Cultural and Neurophysiological Factors,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Eastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, New York, October, 1979.
17.
SmithW. S. and LitmanC. I., Early Adolescent Girls' and Boys' Learning of Spatial Visualization Skill, Science Education, 63, pp. 61–66, 1979.
18.
RosserR. A.HoranP. F.CampbellK.MattsonS.MazzecJ. and SwarmerJ., Acquisition of Spatial Concepts in Relation to Age and Sex, University of Arizona, Department of Educational Psychology, Tucson, Arizona, Final Report NIE-6-79-0091, September, 1980.
19.
MosesB., “The Effects of Spatial Instruction on Mathematical Problem Solving Performance,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1979.
20.
EastmanP. M. and CarryL. R., Interaction of Spatial Visualization and General Reasoning Abilities with Instructional Treatment in Quadratic Inequalities: A Further Investigation, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6: 3, pp. 142–149, May, 1975.
21.
HillD. M. and OberhaufP. A., Spatial Visualization, Problem Solving, and Cognitive Development in Freshman Teacher Education Students, Science Education, 63: 5, pp. 665–670, 1979.
22.
MacCobyE. E. and JacklinC. N., The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1974.
23.
BishopJ. E., Developing Students' Spatial Ability, The Science Teacher, 45: 8, pp. 20–23, 1978.
24.
ConnorJ. M.SerbinL. A. and SchockmanM., Sex Differences in Children's Responses to Training on a Visual-Spatial Test, Developmental Psychology, 13: 3, pp. 293–294, 1977.
25.
KennedyR. S.BittnerA. C. and JonesM. R., The Utility of Commercially Available Television-Computer Games for Assessing Performance and Other Applications, Proceedings of the 51st Meeting of the Aerospace Medical Association, Anaheim, California, May, 1980.
26.
BallH. G., Telegames Teach More Than You Think, Audio-Visual Instruction, 23: 5, pp. 24–26, May, 1978.
27.
MaloneT. W., What Makes Things Fun to Learn?, A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games, Xerox, Palo Alto, California, 1980.
28.
LomanD. F., “Spatial Ability: Individual Differences in Speed and Level,” (Aptitude Research Project, Technical Report 9), unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, 1979.
29.
JonesM. B.KennedyR. S. and BittnerA. C., A Video Game for Performance Testing, American Journal of Psychology, 94: 1, pp. 143–152, 1981.
30.
ShepardR. N. and MetzlerJ., Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects, Science, 171, pp. 701–703, 1971.
