Research into complicated grief assumes that it is a psychological disorder of the grieving individual. This article suggests seven other things that complicated grief may also be: a normalizing construct of psychiatric medicine, an operational requirement of bereavement agencies, a concept by which society as a whole and families can discipline mourning members, a label applied to those who actively resist cultural norms about grief, a product of a society obsessed with risk, and the result of negotiation between various parties in the bereavement field. If complicated grief exists, it is much more multi-faceted than is usually acknowledged.
Grief, like death itself, is undisciplined, risky, wild. That society seeks to discipline grief, as part of its policing of the border between life and death, is predictable, and it is equally predictable that modern society would medicalize grief as the means of policing (Foote & Frank, 1999, p. 170).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArièsP. (1981). The hour of our death. London: Allen Lane.
2.
BeckU. (1992). Risk: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
3.
BeckerH. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
4.
BonannoG. (2001). Grief and emotion: Comparing the grief work and social-functional perspectives. In StroebeM.HanssonR.StroebeW.SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research (pp. 493–516). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
5.
DanforthL. (1982). The death rituals of rural Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
FooteC., & FrankA. (1999). Foucault and therapy: The discipline of grief. In ChambonA.IrvingA., & EpsteinL. (Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 157–187). New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
FoucaultM. (1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Vintage/Random House.
8.
FoucaultM. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage.
9.
FowlkesM. (1990). The social regulation of grief. Sociological Forum, 5(4), 635–652.
10.
FrankA. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
11.
GorerG. (1965). Death, grief, and mourning in contemporary Britain. London: Cresset.
12.
HoganN.WordenJ. W., & SchmidtL. (2003–2004). An empirical study of the proposed complicated grief disorder criteria. Omega, 48(3), 263–277.
13.
Holst-WarhaftG. (2000). The cue for passion: Grief and its political uses. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
14.
HorowitzM.SiegelB.HolenM.BonannoG.MilbrathC., & StinsonC. (1997). Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(7), 904–911.
15.
LaingR. D. (1967). The politics of experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
16.
LindemannE. (1944). Symptomatology and management of acute grief. American Journal of Psychiatry, 101, 141–148.
17.
LoflandL. (1985). The social shaping of emotion: The case of grief. Symbolic Interaction, 8, 171–190.
18.
LunnL. (1990). Having no answer. In SaundersC. (Ed.), Hospice & palliative care (ch. 11). London: Edward Arnold.
19.
Nenola-KallioA. (1982). Studies in Ingrian laments. Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: University of Turku.
20.
OstaseskiF. (1990). Living with the dying. Inquiring Mind, 6, 2, 8–11.
21.
ParkesC. M. (1965). Bereavement and mental illness. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 38, 1–12.
22.
PorterM. (1996). On bereavement. Radio Times, 12th-18th October.
23.
PrigersonH. (2004). Complicated grief, Bereavement Care, 23(3), 38–40.
24.
PrigersonH.FrankE.KaslS.ReynoldsC. F.IIIAndersonB.ZubenkoG. S.HouckP. R.GeorgeC. J., & KupferD. J. (1995). Complicated grief and bereavement-related depression as distinct disorders: Preliminary empirical validation in elderly bereaved spouses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152(1), 22–30.
25.
PrigersonH. G., & JacobsS. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder. In StroebeM.HanssonR.StroebeW., & SchutH. (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research (pp. 613–646). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
26.
PriorL. (1989). The social organisation of death. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
27.
ScheffT. (1966). Being mentally ill. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
28.
SmithG. (1980). Social need. London: Routledge.
29.
StroebeM. (1998). New directions in bereavement research: Exploration of gender differences. Palliative Medicine, 12, 5–12.
30.
StroebeM.van SonM.StroebeW.KleberR.SchutH. & van den BoutJ. (2000). On the classification and diagnosis of pathological grief. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 57–75.
31.
VanstoneW. H. (1982). The stature of waiting. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
32.
WalterT. (1999). On bereavement: The culture of grief. Buckingham: Open University Press.
33.
WalterT. (2000). Grief narratives: The role of medicine in the contemporary policing of grief. Anthropology & Medicine, 7(1), 97–114.
34.
WambachJ. A. (1985). The grief process as a social construct. Omega, 16(3), 201–211.
