This article builds on the assumption that colleges and universities are organizations and subsequently that the organizational perspective provides important insights for improving retention on college and university campuses. A review of existing organizational studies of undergraduate persistence serves as the basis for ten empirically-based recommendations for practice that are designed to help campus leaders improve the effectiveness of retention efforts on campus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AstinA. W. (1985). Achieving academic excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AstinA. W., & ScherreiR. (1980). Maximizing leadership effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BeanJ. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
4.
BeanJ. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 6, 129–148.
5.
BensimonE. M. (1989). The mean of “good presidential leadership”: A frame analysis. Review of Higher Education, 12(2): 107–123.
6.
BensimonE. M.NeumannA., and BirnbaumR. (1989). Making sense of administrative leadership: The “L” word in higher education, ASHE-ERIC Report No. 1. Washington, DC: School of Education and Development, The George Washington University.
7.
BergerJ. B. (1997). The relationship between organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: Generating a quantitatively grounded theory. Unpublished dissertation. Vanderbilt University.
8.
BergerJ. B. (1998). The impact of organizational behavior at colleges on student satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), Miami, FL.
9.
BergerJ. B. (2000). Organizational behavior at colleges and student outcomes: A new perspective on college impact, The Review of Higher Education, 23(1): 61–83.
10.
BergerJ. B., & BraxtonJ. M. (1998). Revising Tinto's interactionalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 103–120.
11.
BergerJ. B., & MilemJ. F. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Volume XV (pp. 268–338). New York: Agathon.
12.
BergquistW. H. (1992). Four cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
BirnbaumR. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
BlauP. M. (1973). The organization of academic work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
BolmanL. G., & DealT. E. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
BraxtonJ. M., & BrierE. M. (1989). Melding organizational and interactional theories of student attrition: A path analytic study. Review of Higher Education, 13(1), 47–61.
17.
BushT. (1995). Theories of educational management. London: Paul Chapman.
18.
CameronK. S. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604–632.
19.
CameronK. S. (1986). A study of organizational effectiveness and its predictors. Management Science, 32, 87–112.
20.
CameronK. S., & EttingtonD. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in higher education, Volume IV (pp. 356–396). New York: Agathon.
21.
ChaffeeE. E. (1985). The concept of strategy: From business to higher education. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 133–171). New York: Agathon.
22.
ChaffeeE. E. (1997). Listening to the people we serve. In TierneyW. G. (Ed.), The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance (pp. 13–37). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
ChildersM. E. (1981). What is political about bureaucratic-collegial decision-making?Review of Higher Education, 5(1), 25–28.
24.
ClarkB. R.HeistP.McConnellT. R.TrowM. A., & YongeG. (1972). Students and colleges: Interaction and change. Berkeley, CA: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.
25.
CohenM. D., & MarchJ. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
EwellP. (1989). Institutional characteristics and faculty/administrator perceptions of outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Research in Higher Education, 30(2): 113–136.
27.
GiordanoF. G. (1992). Evaluation as empowerment: Using evaluation strategies to improve retention of regularly admitted students of color. New Directions for Student Services, 74, 69–77. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
GodwinG. J., & MarkhamW. T. (1996). First encounters of the bureaucratic kind: Early freshman experiences with a campus bureaucracy. Journal of Higher Education, 67(6): 660–691.
29.
KamensD. H. (1971). The college “charter” and college size: Effects on occupational choice and college attrition. Sociology of Education, 44, 270–296.
30.
KamensD. H. (1974). Colleges and elite formation: The case of prestigious American colleges. Sociology of Education, 47, 354–378.
31.
MartinJ. (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
MeyerJ. W. (1970). The charter: Conditions of diffuse socialization in schools. In ScottW. R. (Ed.), Social processes and social structure (pp. 564–578). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33.
MilemJ. F., & BergerJ. B. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), 387–399.
34.
PfefferJ., & SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
PriceJ. L., & MuellerC. W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 543–565.
36.
ShafritzM. J., & OttJ. S. (1991). Classics of organization theory, 3rd edition.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
37.
SmartJ. C.KuhG. D., & TierneyW. G. (1997). The roles of institutional cultures and decision approaches in promoting organizational effectiveness in community colleges. Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 256–281.
38.
StrangeC. (1991). Managing college environments: Theory and practice. In T. K. Miller & R. B. Winston, Jr., and Associates, Administration and leadership in student affairs: Actualizing student development in higher education, second edition (pp. 159–199). Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development, Inc.
39.
StrangeC. (1994). Student development: The evolution and status of an essential idea. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 399–412.
40.
TatumT., & RasoolJ. (1996). Reassessing retention courses: The need to empower students. Equity and Excellence, 25(2–4): 16–21.
41.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.
42.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, second edition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
