The effects of a single-sex educational setting on girls' computing experience and attitudes were investigated. Questionnaire data were collected from a sample of 231 high school girls (aged approximately 15 years) from three single-sex and two co-educational schools in Victoria, Australia. Girls from single-sex settings were found to have more experience with computers, and more positive attitudes toward computers than girls from co-educational settings. However, once the effects of experience with computers were partialed out, there was no effect of educational setting on computing attitudes. Diversity of computing experience was the strongest predictor of high school girls' attitudes toward computers. The findings indicate the importance of designing computing curricula for girls which emphasize a broad range of computing activities in preference to focusing on skill development in a single area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganD., Girls Education and Career Choice: What the Research Says, New South Wales Joint Non-Government Schools P.E.P. Committee, Sydney, 1986.
2.
CarpenterP. and HaydenM., Girls' Academic Achievements: Single-Sex versus Co-Educational Schools in Australia, Sociology of Education, 60, pp. 156–167, 1987.
3.
MixellD. J., An Annotated Bibliography of the Research Comparing Academic Achievement and Attitudes of Students in Co-Educational and Single-Sex Secondary Schools, submitted as part of course requirement, Indiana University at South Bend, 1989.
4.
SmithS., Single-Sex Setting, in Co-education Revisited, DeemR. (ed.), Milton Keynes, Open University Press, 1984.
5.
LeeV. E. and BrykA. S., Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement and Attitudes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, pp. 381–395, 1986.
6.
RiordanC., Public and Catholic Schooling: The Effects of Gender Context Policy, American Journal of Education, 93, pp. 518–539, 1985.
7.
GwizdalaJ. and SteinbackM., High School Females Mathematics Attitudes: An Interim Report, School Science and Mathematics, 90, pp. 215–222, 1990.
8.
HarveyT. and StablesA., Gender Differences in Attitudes to Science for Third Year Pupils: An Argument for Single-Sex Teaching Groups in Mixed Schools, Research in Science & Technological Education, 4, pp. 163–170, 1986.
9.
StablesA., Differences between Pupils from Mixed and Single-Sex Schools in their Enjoyment of School Subjects and in their Attitudes to Science and to School, Educational Review, 42, pp. 221–230, 1990.
10.
ClarkeV. A., Computing in a Social Context, in Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Computers in Education, DuncanK. and HarrisD. (eds.), Amsterdam, IFIPTC 3 and AFIPS, pp. 833–838, 1985.
11.
HarveyT. and WarehamM., An Investigation into Sex Differences in Certain Aspects of Science Practical Work with First-year Secondary School Pupils in Single Sex and Mixed Teaching Groups, Research in Science & Technological Investigation, 2, pp. 187–195, 1984.
12.
RoweK., Single-Sex and Mixed-Sex Classes: The Effects of Class Type on Student Achievement, Confidence and Participation in Mathematics, Australian Journal of Education, 32, pp. 180–202, 1988.
13.
MarshH. W., Effects of Attending Single-Sex and Co-Educational High Schools on Achievement, Attitudes, Behaviours and Sex Differences, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, pp. 70–85, 1989.
14.
YoungD. J. and FraserB. J., Sex Differences in Science Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Research Association, San Francisco, California, April 20–24, 1992.
15.
ElsworthG.DayN.HurworthR., and AndrewsJ., From School to Tertiary Study, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, 1982.
16.
WolfleL. M., Enduring Cognitive Effects of Public and Private Schools, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1986.
17.
ClarkeV. A., Sex Differences in Computing Participation: Concerns, Extent, Reasons and Strategies, Australian Journal of Education, 34, pp. 54–68, 1990.
18.
LevinT. and GordonC., Effect of Gender and Computer Experience on Attitudes toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, pp. 69–88, 1989.
19.
BeckerH. J. and SterlingC. W., Equity in School Computer Use: National Data and Neglected Considerations, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3: 3, pp. 289–311, 1987.
20.
ClarkeV., Why are Girls Under Represented? A Study of Primary School Children, Australian Educational Computing, 2, pp. 39–48, 1987.
21.
ClarkeV. A. and ChambersS. M., Gender-based Factors in Computing Enrollments and Achievement: Evidence from a Study of Tertiary Students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, pp. 409–429, 1989.
22.
ChambersS. M. and ClarkeV. A., Is Inequity Cumulative? The Relationship between Disadvantaged Group Membership and Students' Computing Experience, Knowledge, Attitudes and Intentions, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, pp. 495–518, 1987.
23.
ChenM., Gender and Computers: The Beneficial Effects of Experience on Attitudes, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, pp. 265–282, 1986.
24.
HattieJ. and FitzgeraldD., Sex Differences in Attitudes, Achievement and Use of Computers, Australian Journal of Education, 31, pp. 3–26, 1987.
25.
KleinL. S., Female Students' Underachievement in Computer Science and Mathematics: Reasons and Recommendations, paper presented at NECC, Nashville, Tennessee, July 1990.
26.
TaylorC., Information Technology Field of Study, a report to the Victorian Curriculum Assessment Board, July 1990.
27.
LockheedM. E., Women, Girls and Computers: A First Look at the Evidence, Sex Roles, 13, pp. 115–122, 1985.
28.
CulleyL., Girls, Boys and Computers, Educational Studies, 14, pp. 3–8, 1988.
29.
ArenzB. W. and LeeM. J., Gender Differences in the Attitude, Interest and Participation of Secondary Students in Computer Use, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts, April 16–20, 1990.
30.
LovegroveG. and HallW., Where Have all the Girls Gone?University Computing, 3, pp. 207–210, 1987.
31.
SuttonR. E., Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research, Review of Educational Research, 61, pp. 475–503, 1991.
32.
Hickling-HudsonA., Rich Schools, Poor Schools, Boys and Girls: Computer Education in Australian Secondary Schools, Journal of Educational Policy, 7, pp. 1–21, 1992.
33.
BadagliaccoJ. M., Gender and Race Differences in Computing Attitudes and Experience, Social Science Computer Review, 8, pp. 42–63, 1990.
34.
DambrotF. H.Watkins-MatekM. A.SillingM. S.MarshallR. S., and GarverJ. A., Correlates of Sex Differences in Attitudes toward and Involvement with Computers, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 27, pp. 71–86, 1985.
35.
HydeJ. S., How Large are Cognitive Gender Differences? A Meta-analysis Using w2 and d, American Psychologist, 36, pp. 892–901, 1981.
36.
FeingoldA., Cognitive Differences are Disappearing, American Psychologist, 43, pp. 95–103, 1988.
37.
BearG. G.RichardsH. C., and LancasterP., Attitudes towards Computers: Validation of a Computer Attitudes Scale, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, pp. 207–218, 1987.
38.
LoydB. H.LoydD. F., and GressardC., Gender and Computer Experience as Factors in the Computer Attitudes of Middle School Students, Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, pp. 13–19, 1987.
39.
KieslerS.SproullL., and EcclesJ. S., Pool Halls, Chips and War Games: Women in the Culture of Computing, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, pp. 451–462, 1985.
40.
WhyteJ., Observing Sex Stereotypes and Interactions in the School Lab and Workshop, Educational Review, 36, pp. 75–86, 1984.
41.
Fear-FennM. and KapostasyK. K., Math + Science + Technology = Vocational Preparation for Girls: A Difficult Equation to Balance, Center for Sex Equity, The Ohio State University, Ohio, 1992.
42.
RennieL., Detecting and Accounting for Gender Differences in Mixed-Sex and Single-Sex Groupings in Science Lessons, Educational Review, 39, pp. 65–73, 1987.
43.
RennieL. J. and ParkerL. H., Detecting and Accounting for Gender Differences in Mixed-Sex and Single-Sex Groupings in Science Lessons, Educational Review, 39, pp. 65–73, 1987.
44.
SchubertJ. G., Gender Equity in Computer Learning, Theory into Practice, 25, pp. 267–275, 1987.
45.
RuffinC. and ClarkeV., Sex Role Message and the Computing Media, paper presented at the twenty first Annual Meeting of Australian Social Psychologists, Orewa, New Zealand, pp. 23–26, April 1992.
46.
WareM. C. and StuckM. F., Sex-role Messages vis-a-vis Microcomputer Use: A Look at the Pictures, Sex Roles, 13, pp. 205–214, 1985.
47.
ClarkeV. A., Occupational Sex-typing: A Declining Problem in Australia, Psychological Reports, 65, pp. 1011–1016, 1989.
48.
FreundlichN., Making Science More Seductive to Women on Campus, Business Week, August 28, 1989.
49.
ClarkeV. A., Creation of Female Friendly Computing Environments, in Action for Equity: The Second Decade: Contributions to the 6th International GASAT Conference, Vol. 1: Schooling, pp. 27–35, 1991.
50.
BrecklerS. J., Empirical Validation of Affect, Behaviour and Cognition as Distinct Components of Attitude, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp. 1191–1205, 1984.
51.
JonesT. and ClarkeV. A., A Computer Attitude Scale for Secondary Students, Computers and Education: An International Journal, 22: 4, pp. 315–318, 1994.
52.
StablesA., Differences between Pupils from Mixed and Single-Sex Schools in their Enjoyment of School Subjects and in their Attitudes to Science and to School, Educational Review, 42, pp. 221–230, 1990.
53.
KirkmanC., Computer Experience and Attitudes of 12-year-old Students: Implications for the U.K. National Curriculum, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, pp. 51–62, 1993.
54.
SigurdssonJ. F., Computer Experience, Attitudes toward Computers and Personality Characteristics in Psychology Undergraduates, Personality and Individual Differences, 12, pp. 617–624, 1991.
