This study examined the relations between spousal variables and the psychological well-being of husbands and wives in older couples to determine if spousal characteristics were more important determinants of well-being for wives than for husbands. One hundred-twenty older married men and women completed standardized self-report measures and a short interview. The variables investigated included education, verbal intelligence, personality, physical health, marital adjustment, psychological well-being, as well as response bias to marital defensiveness. Spousal variables significantly predicted wives' well-being (R2 = 29%) with the three most influential predictor variables being the husbands' perception of the marriage, positive dimension of well-being and physical health. In contrast, spousal variables did not significantly predict husbands' well-being. The study supported the hypothesis of differential responsiveness of men and women to spousal variables and highlighted the importance of marital adjustment for the psychological well-being of older wives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GotlibI. H. and HooleyJ. M., Depression and Marital Distress: Current Status and Future Directions, in Handbook of Personal Relationship, DuckS. W. (ed.), Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 543–580, 1988.
2.
GoveW. R. and TudorJ. F., Adult Sex Roles and Mental Illness, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp. 812–832, 1973.
3.
TailleferS. S., Etat Civil, Sexe et Santé Mentale au Québec, Unpublished master's thesis, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 1987.
4.
GlenN. D. and WeaverC. N., The Contribution of Marital Happiness to Global Happiness, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, pp. 161–168, 1981.
5.
GoveW. R.HughesM., and StyleC. B., Does Marriage Have Positive Effects on Psychological Well-being of the Individual?, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, pp. 122–131, 1983.
6.
AkiyamaH. and AntonucciT. C., An Examination of Sex Differences in Social Support in Mid and Late Life, Sex Roles, (in press).
7.
DepnerC. E. and Ingersoll-DaytonB., Conjugal Social Support: Patterns in Later Life, Journal of Gerontology, 40:6, pp. 761–766, 1985.
8.
WeishausS. and FieldD., A Half Century of Marriage: Continuity or Change?, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, pp. 763–774, 1988.
9.
BarnetR. C. and BaruchG. K., Social Roles, Gender, and Psychological Distress, in Gender and Stress, BarnettR. C.BienerL., and BaruchG. K. (eds.), Free Press, New York, pp. 122–143, 1987.
MethorstG. J., Partners of Psychiatric Outpatients: The Difference between Husbands and Wives on Psychological Well-being and Its Implications for Marital Therapy, in Marital Interaction: Analysis and Modification, HahlwegK. and JacobsonN. S. (eds.), pp. 375–386, 1984.
12.
AtchleyR. C. and MillerS. J., Types of Elderly Couples, in Family Relationships in Later Life, BrubakerT. H. (ed.), Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 77–90, 1983.
13.
KrauseN. and MarkidesK., Illness of Spouse and Psychological Well-being in Older Adults, Comprehensive Gerontology B, 1, pp. 105–108, 1987.
14.
CostaP. T. and McCraeR. R., Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on Subjective Well-being: Happy and Unhappy People, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, pp. 668–678, 1980.
15.
KellyE. L. and ConleyJ. J., Personality and Compatibility: A Prospective Analysis of Marital Stability and Marital Satisfaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, pp. 27–40, 1987.
16.
EichornD. H.HuntJ. V., and HonzikM. P., Experience, Personality, and IQ: Adolescence to Middle Age, in Present and Past in Middle Life, EichornD. H.ClausenJ. A.HaanN.HonzikM. P. and MussenP. H. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 89–116, 1981.
17.
Gruber-BaldiniA. L. and SchaieK. W., Longitudinal-Sequential Studies of Marital Assortativity, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago, Illinois, 1986.
18.
BlishenB. R. and RobertsH. A., A Revised Socioeconomic Index for Occupations in Canada, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, pp. 71–79, 1976.
19.
LockeH. J. and WallaceK. M., Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity, Marriage and Family Living, pp. 251–255, 1959.
20.
JemailJ. A. and LoPiccoloJ., A Sexual and a Marital Defensiveness Scale for Each Sex, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 10, pp. 33–40, 1982.
21.
KozmaA. and StonesM. J., Re-validation of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness, Canadian Journal on Aging, 2, pp. 27–29, 1983.
22.
DienerE. and EmmonsR. A., The Independence of Positive and Negative Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp. 1105–1117, 1984.
23.
RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R., and WrightsmanL. S., Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Academic Press, New York, 1991.
24.
EysenckH. J. and EysenckS. B. G., Manual: Eysenck Personality Inventory, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, California, 1968.
25.
BlairW. R. N., Normative Data for Revised Examination “M”, Personal communication, Ottawa, Ontario, 1959.
26.
WylerA. R.MasudaM., and HolmesT. H., Magnitude of Life Events and Seriousness of Illness, Psychosomatic Medicine, 33, pp. 115–122, 1971.
27.
ArbuckleT. Y.GoldD. P., and AndresD., Cognitive Functioning of Older People in Relation to Social and Personality Variables, Psychology and Aging, 1, pp. 55–62, 1986.
28.
HowellD. C., Statistical Methods for Psychology, Duxbury Press, Boston, 1987.
29.
GrambsJ. D., Women over Forty, Springer Publishing Company, New York, 1989.
30.
HafstromJ. L. and SchramV. R., Chronic Illness in Couples: Selected Characteristics, Including Wife's Satisfaction with and Perception of Marital Relationships, Family Relations, 23, pp. 195–203, 1984.
