Seventy-four undergraduate students voluntarily participated in a laboratory experiment involving the learning of WordStar, a personal computer word processing software package. The experiment constituted a 2X2X2 factorial design; two levels of computer anxiety (based on a pre-experimental questionnaire), two types of training (lecture/demonstration versus self-paced tutorial) and a matching/nonmatching of personal preference for a particular leaning mode. Results indicated that pre-experimental computer anxiety directly affected post-experimental computer anxiety, number of questions asked during training and future intentions to avoid using WordStar. Type of training affected the number of questions asked and marginally influenced the number of errors. Preferred choice of training demonstrated no main effects but did interact with the other independent variables.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SeawardM. R., Awakening to Office Automation, Management World, 12:5, pp. 27–29, 1983.
2.
PaulL., Research on Cyberphiliacs, Cyberphobiacs Reveals 30% of Workers Fear Computers, Computerworld, 15, p. 14, April 5, 1982.
3.
SpielbergerC. D., Anxiety and Behavior, Academic Press, New York, 1966.
4.
HerdmanP. C., High Tech Anxiety, Management Focus, 30:3, pp. 29–31, 1983.
5.
DambrotF. H.Watkins-MalekM. A.SillingS. M.MarshallR. S.GarverJ. A., Correlates of Sex Differences in Attitudes toward and Involvement with Computers, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, pp. 71–86, 1985.
6.
HowardG. S., Computer Anxiety and Other Determinants of Managers' Attitudes toward the Usefulness of Microcomputers in Management, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, 1983.
7.
MaurerM. M., Development and Validation of a Measure of Computer Anxiety, unpublished master's thesis, Iowa State University, 1983.
8.
OettingE. R., Manual for Oetting's Computer Anxiety Scale (COMPAS), Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1983.
9.
RaubA. C., Correlates of Computer Anxiety in College Students, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1981.
10.
RohnerD. J.SimonsenM. R., Development of an Index of Computer Anxiety, paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia, April, 1981, ERIC Document Number 207487.
11.
JordanE. W.StroupD. F., The Behavioral Antecedents of Computer Fear, Journal of Data Education, 22, pp. 7–8, 1982.
12.
MorrowP. C.PrellE. R.McElroyJ.C., Attitudinal and Behavioral Correlates of Computer Anxiety, Psychological Reports, 59, pp. 1199–1204, 1986.
13.
HultgrenW. A., An Introduction to Computerized Training, Personnel Journal, 63:10, pp. 22–23, 1984.
14.
SeldenP. H.SchultzN. L., What the Research Says about CAI's Potential, Training, 19:11, pp. 61–64, 1982.
15.
RafaeliA., Employee Attitudes toward Working with Computers, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 7, pp. 89–106, 1986.
16.
HenryC. M.HoltanB. D., Introducing Novices to the Computer: Hands-on vs. Demonstration, School Science and Mathematics, 87:1, pp. 598–607, 1987.
17.
MarcoulidesG. A., The Relationship between Computer Anxiety and Computer Achievement, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4:2, pp. 151–157, 1988.
18.
BiksonT. K.GutekB. A., Training in Automated Offices: An Empirical Study of Design and Methods, in Training for Tomorrow, RijnsdorpJ. I.PrompT. J. (eds.), Proceedings of IFAC/IFIP 1983 Symposium, pp. 129–143, 1983.
19.
CarrierC. A.SalesG. C., Pair Versus Individual Work on the Acquisition of Concepts in a Computer-based Instructional Lesson, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, pp. 11–17, 1987.
20.
TobiasS., Anxiety Research in Educational Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, pp. 573–582, 1979.
21.
ResnickL. B., Toward a Usable Psychology of Reading Instruction, in Theory and Practice of Early Reading, 3, ResnickL.B.WeaverP. A. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 355–372, 1979.
22.
CambreM. A.CookD. L., Computer Anxiety: Definition, Measurement and Correlates, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1:1, pp. 37–54, 1985.
23.
WickerA. W.PomazalR. J., The Relationship Between Attitudes and Behavior as a Function of Specificity of Attitude Object and Presence of Significant Person during Assessment Conditions, in The Consistency Controversy, LiskaA. E. (ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 123–129, 1971.
24.
WickerA. W., Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects, Journal of Social Issues, 25:4, pp. 41–78, 1969.
25.
SimonsonM. R.MaurerM.Montag-TorardiM.WhitakerM., Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3:2, pp. 231–247, 1987.
26.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E., The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior, in Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (eds.), General Learning Press, Morristown, New Jersey, pp. 79–94, 1972.
27.
LockeE. A., Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings, Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1986.
