In spite of the recent proliferation of technical writing programs, textbooks, and professional associations, quantitative information on the people and work involved in technical writing is scant. This article reports the responses of 122 technical writers in the San Diego area to a questionnaire asking them about the tasks they perform, documents they produce, skills they consider significant, audiences they write to, working conditions, types of companies they work for, and education and training. The pilot survey also identified other demographic information such as salary and length of service as technical writers and in their present position.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HowardL. A.Jr., A Survey of Technical Communication Programs in U.S. Colleges and Universities—1984, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, pp. 172–176, September, 1984.
2.
BrockmanR. J., Advisory Boards in Technical Communication Programs and Classes, Technical Writing Teacher, pp. 137–146, Spring, 1982.
3.
FeinbergS. and GoldmanJ., Content for a Course in Technical Communication: Results of a Survey, Technical Communication, pp. 21–25, Second Quarter, 1984.
4.
GreenM. M. and NolanT. D., A Systematic Analysis of the Technical Communicator's Job: A Guide for Educators, Technical Communication, pp. 9–12, Fourth Quarter, 1984.
5.
CogginB., Better Educational Programs for Students of Technical Communication, Technical Communication, pp. 175–179, Second Quarter, 1980.
6.
HarwoodJ. T., Freshman English Ten Years After: Writing in the World, College Composition and Communication, pp. 281–283, October, 1982.
7.
BatailleR. R., Writing in the World of Work, College Composition and Communication, pp. 276–280, October, 1982.
8.
SpretnakC. M., A Survey of the Frequency and Importance of Technical Communication in an Engineering Career, Technical Writing Teacher, pp. 133–136, Spring, 1982.
9.
OdellL.GoswamiD.HerringtonA., and QuickD., Studying Writing in Non-Academic Settings, in New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, AndersonP. V. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Farmingdale, New York, pp. 17–40, 1983.
10.
AndersonP. V., What Technical and Scientific Communicators Do: A Comprehensive Model for Developing Academic Programs, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, pp. 161–167, September, 1984.
11.
LittleS. Burgus, The Student Internship Experience, in Proceedings in Technical Writing and Business Communication: CCCC, 1985, CatronD. M. (ed.), The University of Iowa, Ames, 1985.
12.
LittleS. BurgusUsing Revision to Teach Grammar, Connecticut English Journal, 16:2, Spring, 1985.
13.
LittleS. Burgus, Industry and Education Working Together: The Use of Advisory Committees, Proceedings, 1985, Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, February 13–15, 1985.
14.
LittleS. Burgus, Industry in the Technical Writing Classroom: A Preliminary Report of a Study, Proceedings IEEE Professional Communication Society Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, October 15–18, 1985.
15.
LittleS. Burgus, Developing Student Internships for Technical Writers, Proceedings, 31st International Technical Communication Conference, Seattle, April 29–May 2, 1984.
16.
McLarenM.Plain Writing, The Accountants' Journal, 60:2, pp. 74–75, March 1981.
17.
McLarenM.Modest Beginnings: Business Communication in New Zealand, The Journal of Business Communication, 28:3, pp. 11–15, 1981.
18.
McLarenM.Another Approach to Readability, Journal of the American Business Communication Association, 19:2, pp. 54–59, 1982.
19.
McLarenM.Business Communication in New Zealand, Australian Communication Review, 2:1, pp. 1–3, March, 1982.
20.
McLarenM., Gobbledygook in an Income-tax Regulation, The New Zealand Law Journal, June, 1983.
