The efficacy of CBT as an instructional medium has been researched extensively. Studies show that when there is a good instructional design, there is a moderately positive effect on trainee performance. Therefore, when working on the initial stages of a large-scale CBT project, one must create an instructional design that enforces a consistent style for all lessons and yet is solidly rooted in behavioral and cognitive learning theory. One must carefully design lesson structure and strategies; consider navigation and learner control issues; and incorporate learning strategy training into the lesson structure if such training is necessary. This article summarizes a nine-month effort to create CBT production guidelines that address these concerns. It concludes with recommendations for practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClarkR. E., Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media, Review of Educational Research, 53(4), pp. 445–459, 1983.
2.
ClarkR. E. and SugrueB. M., Research on Instructional Media, in Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, ElyD. (ed.), Libraries Unlimited, Littleton, Colorado, 1988.
3.
KearsleyG.HunterB., and SeidelR. J., Two Decades of Computer-Based Instruction Projects: What Have We Learned?, T.H.E. Journal, 10(3), pp. 90–94, 1983.
4.
BalajthyE., Computers and Reading: Lessons from the Past and the Technologies of the Future, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.
5.
Bangert-DrownsR. L.KulikJ. A., and KulikC. C., Effectiveness of Computer-based Education in Secondary Schools, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1985.
6.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C., and Bangert-DrownsR. L., Effectiveness of Computer-based Education in Elementary Schools, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1985.
7.
LevinH., Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction, in Microcomputers and Education, CulbertsonJ. A. and CunninghamL. L. (eds.), National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 156–174, 1986.
8.
BloomB. S.EnglehartN. D.FurstE. J.MillW. H. and KrathwohlD. R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain, McKay, New York, 1956.
9.
GagneR. M.BriggsL. J., and WagerW. W., Principles of Instructional Design, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1988.
10.
MerrillD. M., What is Learner Control?, in Instructional Development: The State of the Art, BassR. K. and DillsC. R., (eds.), Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa, 1984.
11.
MagerR. F., Preparing Instructional Objectives, Lake, Belmont, California, 1984.
12.
O'NeilH. F.Jr.Metacognition: Teaching and Measurement, invited presentation given at Canberra, Melbourne, Australia, 1990.
13.
KierasD. E., What Mental Model Should be Taught: Choosing Instructional Content for Complex Engineered Systems, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lessons Learned, PsotkaJ.MasseyL. D., and MutterS. A. (eds.), Erlbaum, New York, 1988.
14.
McNeilB. J. and NelsonK. R., Meta-analysis of Interactive Video Instruction: A Ten Year Review of Achievement Effects, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(1), pp. 1–6, 1991.
SkinnerB. F., Science and Human Behavior, Macmillan, New York, 1953.
17.
HooperS. and HannafinM. J., Factors Affecting the Legibility of Computer-generated Text, Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), pp. 22–29, 1986.
18.
VargasJ. S., Instructional Design Flaws in Computer-assisted Instruction, Phi Delta Kappan, 67, pp. 738–744, 1986.
19.
GearyG., Making CBT Happen, Weingarten, Boston, 1988.
20.
PoppenL. and PoppenR., The Use of Behavioral Principles in Educational Software, Educational Technology, 28(2), pp. 37–41, 1988.
21.
JonesB. F., Quality and Equality Through Cognitive Instruction, Educational Leadership, 43, pp. 5–11, 1986.
22.
GagneE. D., The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning, Little, Brown, Boston, Massachusetts, 1985.
23.
SmithS. L., Learning Strategies of Mature College Learners, Journal of Reading, 26, pp. 5–12, 1982.
24.
SmithS. P., Comprehension and Comprehension Monitoring by Experienced Readers, Journal of Reading, 28, pp. 292–300, 1985.
25.
PressleyM.GoodchildF.FleetJ.ZajchowskiR., and EvansE. D., The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction, Elementary School Journal, 89, pp. 301–342, 1989.
26.
LevinJ. R., Four Cognitive Aspects of Learning-strategy Instruction, Educational Psychologist, 21, pp. 3–17, 1986.
27.
WeinsteinC. E. and MayerR. E., The Teaching of Learning Strategies, in Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Edition), WittrockM. (ed.), Macmillan, New York, 1986.
28.
GoodT. L. and BrophyJ. E., Educational Psychology: A Realistic Approach (4th Edition), Longman, White Plains, New York, 1990.
29.
ThomasJ. W. and RohwerW. D., Academic Studying: The Role of Learning Strategies, Educational Psychologist, 21, pp. 19–41, 1986.
30.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.JacobsenD. R., and BullockT. L., Tools for Learning: A Guide to Teaching Study Skills, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, 1990.
31.
Forrest-PressleyD. L. and WallerT. G., Cognition, Metacognition, and Reading, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
32.
HallerE. P.ChildD. A., and WalbergH. J., Can Comprehension be Taught?, Educational Researcher, pp. 5–8, 1988.
33.
MeichenbaumD., Teaching Thinking: A Cognitive-behavioral Perspective, in Thinking and Learning Skills: Vol. 2. Research and Open Questions, SegalJ. W.ChipmanS. F. and GlaserR. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1985.
34.
BrownA. L.BransfordJ. D.CampioneJ. C., and FerraraR. A., Learning, Remembering and Understanding, in Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive Development, FlavellJ. and MarkmanE. (eds.), Wiley, New York, pp. 77–166, 1983.
35.
FlavellJ. H., Metacognition and Meta Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive Developmental Inquiry, American Psychologist, 34, pp. 906–911, 1979.
36.
CornoL. and MandinachE. B., The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation, Educational Psychologist, 18(2), pp. 88–108, 1983.
37.
BlockE., Comprehension Strategies of Nonproficient College Readers, in Solving Problems in Literacy: Learners, Teachers and Researchers. Thirty-fifth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, NilesJ. A. and LalikR. V. (eds.), National Reading Conference, Rochester, New York, pp. 41–46, 1986.
38.
MikuleckyL. and WinchesterD., Job Literacy and Job Performance Among Nurses at Varying Employment Levels, Adult Education Quarterly, 34, pp. 1–15, 1983.
39.
MikuleckyL. and EhlingerJ., The Influence of Metacognitive Aspects of Literacy on Job Performance of Electronics Technicians, Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, pp. 43–62, 1985.
40.
BakerL., Metacognition, Comprehension Monitoring, and the Adult Reader, Educational Psychology Review, 1, pp. 3–38, 1989.
41.
SpringC., Comprehension and Study Strategies Reported by University Freshmen Who are Good and Poor Readers, Instructional Science, 14, pp. 157–167, 1985.
42.
PressleyM.SnyderB. L., and Cariglia-BullT., How Can Good Strategy Use be Taught to Children? Evaluation of Six Alternative Approaches, in Transfer of Learning: Contemporary Research and Application, CormierS. M. and HagmanJ. D. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1987.
43.
NistS. L.SimpsonM. L., and HogrebeM. C., The Relationship Between the Use of Study Strategies and Test Performance, Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, pp. 15–28, 1985.
44.
DuffyT. M. and FugateD., Fundamental Skills Training in the Saudi Naval Expansion Program: Evaluation Report 1. (NRDDC Report No. TR 82-31), Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, California, 1982.
45.
ReigeluthC. M. and SchwartzE., An Instructional Theory for the Design of Computer-based Simulations, Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 16(1), pp. 1–10, 1989.
46.
MillerG. A., The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity to Process Information, Psychological Review, 63, pp. 81–97, 1956.
47.
ConnellT. and JohnsonR. J., Crosscultural Communications course, course presented at USAF Special Operations School, Hurlburt Field, Florida.
48.
TonjesM. J. and ZintzM. V., Teaching Reading/Thinking/Study Skills in Content Classrooms, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, 1981.
