Mammography screening is a profit-driven technology posing risks compounded by unreliability. In striking contrast, annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health professional, together with monthly breast self-examination (BSE), is safe, at least as effective, and low in cost. International programs for training nurses how to perform CBE and teach BSE are critical and overdue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GofmanJ. W.Preventing Breast Cancer: The Story of a Major Proven Preventable Cause of this Disease. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, San Francisco, 1995.
2.
EpsteinS. S.SteinmanD., and LeVertS.The Breast Cancer Prevention Program, Ed. 2. Macmillan, New York, 1998.
3.
BertellR.Breast cancer and mammography. Mothering, Summer 1992, pp. 49–52.
4.
National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, Advisory Committee.Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR). Washington, D.C., 1972.
5.
SwiftM.Ionizing radiation, breast cancer, and ataxia-telangiectasia. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 86(21): 1571–1572, 1994.
6.
BridgesB. A., and ArlettC. F.Risk of breast cancer in ataxia-telangiectasia. N. Engl. J. Med.326(20): 1357, 1992.
7.
QuigleyD. T.Some neglected points in the pathology of breast cancer, and treatment of breast cancer. Radiology, May 1928, pp. 338–346.
8.
WatmoughD. J., and QuanK. M.X-ray mammography and breast compression. Lancet340: 122, 1992.
9.
MartinezB.Mammography centers shut down as reimbursement feud rages on. Wall Street Journal, October 30, 2000, p. A-1.
10.
VogelV. G.Screening younger women at risk for breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.16: 55–60, 1994.
11.
BainesC. J., and DayanR.A tangled web: Factors likely to affect the efficacy of screening mammography. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(10): 833–838, 1999.
12.
LayaM. B.Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88(10): 643–649, 1996.
13.
SprattJ. S., and SprattS. W.Legal perspectives on mammography and self-referral. Cancer69(2): 599–600, 1992.
14.
SkrabanekP.Shadows over screening mammography. Clin. Radiol.40: 4–5, 1989.
15.
DavisD. L., and LoveS. J.Mammography screening. JAMA271(2): 152–153, 1994.
16.
ChristiansenC. L.Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(20): 1657–1666, 2000.
17.
NapoliM.Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: The hidden pitfalls of cancer screening. Am. J. Nurs., 2001, in press.
18.
BaumM.Epidemiology versus scaremongering: The case for humane interpretation of statistics and breast cancer. Breast J.6(5): 331–334, 2000.
19.
MillerA. B.Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50–59 years. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(18): 1490–1499, 2000.
20.
BlackW. C.Overdiagnosis: An underrecognized cause of confusion and harm in cancer screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(16): 1280–1282, 2000.
21.
NapoliM.What do women want to know?J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.22: 11–13, 1997.
22.
LernerB. H.Public health then and now: Great expectations: Historical perspectives on genetic breast cancer testing. Am. J. Public Health89(6): 938–944, 1999.
23.
GotzscheP. C., and OlsenO.Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?Lancet355: 129–134, 2000.
24.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.Breast cancer screening for women ages 40–49, January 21–23, 1997. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.22: 7–18, 1997.
25.
RossW. S.Crusade: The Official History of the American Cancer Society, p. 96. Arbor House, New York, 1987.
26.
HallD. C.Improved detection of human breast lesions following experimental training. Cancer46(2): 408–414, 1980.
27.
SmigelK.Perception of risk heightens stress of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85(7): 525–526, 1993.
28.
BainesC. J.Efficacy and opinions about breast self-examination. In Advanced Therapy of Breast Disease, edited by SingletaryS. E. and RobbG. L., pp. 9–14. B. C. Decker, Hamilton, Ont., 2000.
29.
LeightS. B.The effect of structured training on breast self-examination search behaviors as measured using biomedical instrumentation. Nurs. Res.49(5): 283–289, 2000.
30.
WordenJ. K.A community-wide program in breast self-examination. Prev. Med.19: 254–269, 1990.
31.
FletcherS. W.How best to teach women breast self-examination: A randomized control trial. Ann. Intern. Med.112(10): 772–779, 1990.
32.
Associated Press. FDA approves use of pad in breast exam.New York Times, December 25, 1995, p. 9Y.
33.
GehrkeA.Breast self-examination: A mixed message. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(14): 1120–1121, 2000.
34.
ThomasD. B.Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: Methodology and preliminary results. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 89: 355–365, 1997.
35.
BainesC. J.MillerA. B., and BassettA. A.Physical examination: Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer63: 1816–1822, 1989.
36.
LewisT.Women's health is no longer a man's world. New York Times, February 7, 2001, p. 1.
37.
MillerA. B.BainesC. J., and WallC.Correspondence. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93(5): 396, 2001.
38.
KuroishiT.Effectiveness of mass screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer7(1): 1–8, 2000.
39.
EpsteinS. S.American Cancer Society: The world's wealthiest “non-profit” institution. Int. J. Health Serv. 29(3): 565–578, 1999.
40.
EpsteinS. S., and GrossL.The high stakes of cancer prevention. Tikkun15(6): 33–39, 2000.
41.
EpsteinS. S.The Politics of Cancer Revisited. East Ridge Press, Hankins, N.Y., 1998.
42.
RamirezA.Mammogram reimbursements. New York Times, February 19, 2001.
43.
JohnL.Digital imaging: A marketing triumph. Breast Cancer Action Newsletter, No. 62, November-December 2000.
44.
TarkanL.An update that matters? Mammography's next step is assessed. New York Times, January 2, 2001, p. D5.
45.
MillerA. B.The role of screening in the fight against breast cancer. World Health Forum13: 277–285, 1992.
46.
MittraI.Breast screening: The case for physical examination without mammography. Lancet343(8893): 342–344, 1994.
47.
GreenleeR. T.Cancer Statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J. Clin.51(1): 15–36, 2001.
