This note raises a number of questions about the theoretical and empirical adequacy of the notion that Americans deny death. An attempt is made to point out the difficulty of concluding that Americans deny death without a precise understanding of what denial means and how it can be measured. Some suggestions regarding the development of denial are made. And an example is offered by way of demonstrating the need for adequate conceptualization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerP. and LiebanR., Kulturelle Wertstruktur und Bestattungspraktiken in den Vereinigten Staaten (Value Aspects of American Funeral Practices)Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Socialpsychologie12, Heft 2, 1960.
2.
BergerP. and LuckmanT., The Social Construction of Reality, Doubleday and Co., Garden City, 1967.
3.
BergerP., Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective, Doubleday and Co., Garden City, 1963.
4.
BlalockH. M., The Measurement Problem: A Gap Between the Languages of Theory and Research. In BlalockH. M. and BlalockA. (Ed.), Methodology In Social Research, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1968, p. 5–27.
5.
FeifelH., Death. In FarberowN. (Ed.), Taboo Topics, Atherton Press, New York, 1963, p. 8–21.
6.
FultonR., The Sacred and the Secular: Attitudes of the American Public Toward Death, Funerals, and Funeral Directors. In FultonR. (Ed.), Death and Identity, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1965, p. 89–105.
7.
GouldnerA. W., The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1970.
8.
KalishR. A., The Effects of Death Upon The Family. In PearsonL. (Ed.), Death and Dying, The Press of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 1969, p. 79–107.
9.
KaplanA., The Conduct of Inquiry, Chandler Publishing Co., San Francisco, 1964.
10.
MartelM. U., On the Proper Care and Feeding of Sociological Property–Concepts: A “Life–Cycle” Approach to Conceptual Validity. An unpublished paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, 1960, 18 pages.
11.
MartelM. U., Academentia Praecox: The Aims, Merits and Empirical Scope of Parsons' Multi-Systemic “Language-Rebellion” (1958 – 1968). Prepared for TurkH. and SimpsonR. L. (Ed.), Institutions and Social Exchange: The Sociologies of Talcott Parsons and George Homans, Bobbs-Merril, Co., New York, (in press).
12.
MertonR. K., Social Theory and Social Structure, The Free Press, New York, 1957.
13.
ParsonsT., The Social System, The Free Press, New York, 1951.
14.
ParsonsT., Toward a Healthy Maturity, Jour. of Health and Human Behavior, 1, 3, 163–173, 1960.
15.
ParsonsT., Death in American Society: A Brief Working Paper. Amer. Behavioral Scientist, 6, 61–65, 1963.
16.
ParsonsT. and LidzV., Death In American Society. In ShneidmanE. S., (Ed.), Essays In Self-Destruction, Science House, Inc., New York, 1967, p. 133–170.
17.
StinchombeA. L., Constructing Social Theories, Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York, 1968.
18.
VernonG. M., Some Questions About the “Inevitable-Death Orientation”Sociological Symposium, 1, 74–84, 1968.
19.
VernonG. M., The Sociology of Death, The Ronald Press Co., New York, 1970.
20.
WilsonB., The Religious Teaching and Organization of Christian Science. In ScottW. R. and VolkartE. H. (Ed.), Medical Care, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1966, p. 41–51.
