This article briefly describes the phenomenological reports of individuals who have survived a near-death experience (NDE) and summarizes the methodological problems of assessing and defining their experience, specifically the out-of-the-body (OBE) experience associated with an NDE. The authors, using a single-person research design, offer one approach to quantifying the OBE associated with an NDE. They administered the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI) and the Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire (DAQ) to one participant across several stimulus conditions including: hypnosis, resting with eyes closed, recollection of an out-of-the-body experience, and recollection of the out-of-the-body experience during hypnotic regression. Similarities and differences among the participant's experiences associated with these stimulus conditions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LockeT.ShontzF., Personality Correlates of the Near-Death Experience: A Preliminary Study, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 77, pp. 311–318, 1983.
2.
NoyesR.KlettiR., The Experience of Dying from Falls, Omega, 3, pp. 45–52, 1972.
3.
MoodyR.Jr., Life After Life, Mockingbird Books, Georgia, 1975.
4.
OsisK.HaroldssonS., At the Hour of Death, Avon Books, New York, 1977.
5.
RingK.FranklinS., Do Suicide Survivors Report Near Death Experiences, Omega, 12, pp. 191–208, 1981–82.
6.
RingK., Life at Death: A Scientific Investigation of the Near-Death Experience, Coward, McCann, and Geoghegan, New York, 1980.
7.
GabbardG.TwemlowS., An Overview of Altered Mind/Body Perception, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 50, pp. 351–366, 1986.
8.
BatesB.StanleyA., The Epidemiology and Differential Diagnosis of Near-Death Experience, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, pp. 542–549, 1985.
9.
LindleyJ.BryanS.ConleyR., Near-Death Experiences in a Pacific Northwest American Population: The Evergreen Study, Anabiosis, 1, pp. 104–125, 1981.
10.
MenzR., The Denial of Death and the Out-of-the-Body Experience, Journal of Religion and Health, 23, pp. 317–329, 1984.
11.
GabbardG.TwemlowS.JonesF., Do “Near Death Experiences” Occur Only Near Death?, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 169, pp. 374–377, 1981.
12.
GabbardG.TwemlowS.JonesF., Differential Diagnosis of Altered Mind/Body Perception, Psychiatry, 45, pp. 361–369, 1982.
13.
TartC. T., States of Consciousness, Dutton, New York, 1975.
14.
HilgardE. R., Altered States of Consciousness, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 149, pp. 68–79, 1969.
15.
WeitzenhofferA. M., Hypnotism and Altered States of Consciousness, in Expanding Dimensions of Consciousness, SugermanA. A.TarterR. E. (eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 183–225, 1978.
16.
KrippnerS., Altered States of Consciousness, in The Highest State of Consciousness, WhiteJ. (ed.), John Wiley, New York, pp. 1–5, 1972.
17.
HilgardE. R., The Experience of Hypnosis, Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1965.
18.
SheehanP. W.McConkeyK. M., Hypnosis and Experience: The Exploration of Phenomena and Process, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 1982.
19.
HilgardE. R., Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action, John Wiley, New York, 1977.
20.
BarberT. X.SpanosN. P.ChavesJ. F., Hypnosis, Imagination, and Human Potentialities, Pergamon Press, New York, 1974.
21.
SpanosN. P., Hypnotic Behavior: A Social-Psychological Interpretation of Amnesia, Analgesia, and “Trance Logic,”The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, pp. 449–502, 1986.
22.
OrneM. T., On the Simulating Subject as a Quasi-Control Group in Hypnosis Research: What, Why, and How, in Hypnosis: Developments in Research and New Perspectives (2nd Edition), FrommE.ShorR. E. (eds.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 519–565, 1972.
23.
BarberT. X.SpanosN. P., Toward a Convergence in Hypnosis Research, American Psychologist, 29, pp. 500–511, 1974.
24.
TalbotM., Mysticism and the New Physics, Bantam, New York, 1980.
25.
TwemlowS.GabbardG., The Influence of Demographic/Psychological Factors and Pre-Existing Conditions on the Near-Death Experience, Omega, 15, pp. 223–235, 1984.
26.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Hypnotizability, Absorption, and Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, pp. 80–88, 1988.
27.
KumarV. K.PekalaR. J., Variations in Phenomenological Experience as a Function of Hypnotic Susceptibility: A Replication, British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, pp. 17–22, 1989.
28.
PekalaR. J., Mapping the Structures and Patterns of Consciousness: User's Manual for the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory, Psychophenomenological Concepts, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1985.
29.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility by a Self-Report Phenomenological State Instrument, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, pp. 114–121, 1984.
30.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Predicting Hypnotic Susceptibility via a Self-Report Instrument: A Replication, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, pp. 57–66, 1987.
31.
PekalaR. J.LevineR. L., Mapping Consciousness: Development of an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 1, pp. 29–47, 1981.
32.
PekalaR. J.LevineR. L., Quantifying States of Consciousness via an Empirical-Phenomenological Approach, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 2, pp. 51–71, 1982.
33.
PekalaR. J.SteinbergJ.KumarV. K., Measurement of Phenomenological Experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, pp. 983–989, 1986.
34.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F., Retrospective Phenomenological Assessment: Mapping Consciousness in Reference to Specific Stimulus Conditions, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, pp. 247–274, 1983.
35.
PekalaR. J.WengerC. F.LevineR. L., Individual Differences in Phenomenological Experience: States of Consciousness as a Function of Absorption, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, pp. 125–132, 1985.
36.
ShorR. E.OrneE. C., The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1962.
37.
WeitzenhofferA. M.HilgardE. R., Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California, 1962.
38.
PekalaR. J., The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI), Psychophenomenological Concepts, West Chester, Pennsylvania, 1982.
39.
PekalaR. J., The Dimensions of Attention Questionnaire, Unpublished psychological test, Coatesville VA Medical Center, Coatesville, Pennsylvania, 1985.
40.
PekalaR. J.ForbesE. J., Subjective Effects of Several Stress Management Strategies: With Reference to Attention, Paper submitted for publication.
41.
PekalaR. J.KumarV. K., Phenomenological Variations in Attention Across Low, Medium, and High Susceptible Subjects, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 7, pp. 303–314, 1987/88.
42.
PekalaR. J.NaglerR., The Assessment of Hypnoidal States: Rationale and Clinical Application, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, pp. 231–236, 1989.
43.
PekalaR. J.ForbesE. J., Hypnoidal Effects Associated with Several Stress Management Techniques, Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, pp. 121–132, 1988.
