Conflict is a pervasive feature of human existence. There are anger management courses and popular books giving advice on dealing with unruly people. Imagined interaction (II) conflict-linkage theory explains how conflict persists in interpersonal communication through mental imagery and imagined interactions. Imagined interactions are covert dialogues that people have in which they relive prior conversations while anticipating new encounters. Conflict is kept alive in the human mind through recalling prior arguments while anticipating what may be said at future meetings. II conflict-linkage theory provides an explanatory mechanism for why conflict is enduring, maintained, may be constructive or destructive, and can erupt anytime in interpersonal relationships. The theory explains features of face-to-face conflict through understanding how people manage conflict during actual interaction by looking at how they think between such interactions. In order to understand conflict, cognitions about interaction episodes are examined in terms of the messages that people imagine communicating to others as well as those they recall from prior encounters. The theory contains three axioms and nine theorems that explain how interpersonal conflict endures and is managed. This report reviews the support for the theorems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions: Daydreaming about Communication, Hampton, Cresskill, New Jersey, 2003.
2.
HoneycuttJ. M.EdwardsR.ZagackiK. S., Using Imagined Interaction Features to Predict Measures of Self-Awareness: Loneliness, Locus of Control, Self-Dominance, and Emotional Intensity, Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, pp. 17–31, 1989–90.
3.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR., Imagined Interaction, Conversational Sensitivity and Communication Competence, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12:2, pp. 139–157, 1992.
4.
LyubomirskyS.TuckerK. L.CaldwellN. D.BergK., Why Ruminators Are Poor Problem Solvers: Clues from the Phenomenology of Dysphoric Rumination, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, pp. 1041–1060, 1999.
5.
AcitelliL. K., You, Me, and Us: Perspectives on Relationship Awareness, in Individuals in Relationships, DuckS. (ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 144–174, 1993.
6.
DanceF. E. X., The Concept of Communication, Journal of Communication, 20, pp. 201–210, 1970.
7.
WoodJ. T., Communication Mosaics, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1998.
8.
BarkerL.KiblerR., Speech Communication Behavior: Perspectives and Principles, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1971.
9.
ShedletskyL., Meaning and Mind: An Intrapersonal Approach to Human Communication, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Bloomington, Indiana, 1989.
10.
FisherB. A., Interpersonal Communication: Pragmatics of Human Relationships, Random House, New York, 1987.
11.
HoneycuttJ. M.CantrillJ. G., Cognition, Communication, and Romantic Relationships, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 2001.
12.
DuckS.RuttD. J.HurstM. H.StrejcH., Some Evident Truths about Conversation in Everyday Relationships: All Communications Are Not Created Equal, Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267, 1991.
13.
DuckS., Talking Relationships into Being, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, pp. 535–540, 1995.
14.
DuckS., Personal Relationships Research in the 1980s: Towards an Understanding of Complex Human Sociality, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, pp. 114–119, 1980.
15.
HoneycuttJ. M., A Pilot Analysis of Imagined Interaction Accounts in the Elderly, in Louisiana: Health and the Elderly, MarksR.PadgettJ. (eds.), Pan American Life Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 183–201, 1989.
16.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions, Imagery and Mindfulness/Mindlessness, in Mental Imagery, KunzendorfR. (ed.), Plenum, New York, pp. 121–128, 1991.
17.
HoneycuttJ. M., The Oral History Interview and Reports of Imagined Interactions, Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 6, pp. 63–69, 1995.
18.
HoneycuttJ. M., Imagined Interactions, Recurrent Conflict and Thought about Personal Relationships: A Memory Structure Approach, in Intrapersonal Communication Processes, AitkenJ. E.ShedletskyL. J. (eds.), Speech Communication Association and Midnight Oil Multimedia, Inc., Plymouth, Michigan, pp. 138–150, 1995.
19.
HoneycuttJ. M.WiemannJ. M., An Analysis of Functions of Talk and Reports of Imagined Interactions (IIS) during Engagement and Marriage, Human Communication Research, 25, pp. 399–419, 1998.
20.
FitzpatrickM. A., Between Husbands and Wives: Communication in Marriage, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1988.
21.
AllenT. H.BerkosK. M., A Functional Approach to Imagined Interaction: Examining Conflict-Linkage and Aggression, paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, New York, November 1998.
22.
PearceW. B.CronenV. E., Communication, Action, and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities, Praeger, New York, 1980.
23.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ. H.JacksonD. D., Pragmatics of Human Communication, Norton, New York, 1967.
24.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H., Conflict Development of Close Relationships, in Social Exchanges in Developing Relationships, BurgessR. L.HustonT. L. (eds.), New York: Academic Press, pp. 135–168, 1979.
25.
Kroll-MensingD., Differentiating Anxiety and Depression: An Experience Sampling Analysis, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1992.
26.
EdwardsR.HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S., Imagined Interaction as an Element of Social Cognition, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, pp. 23–45, 1988.
27.
HoneycuttJ. M.ZagackiK. S.EdwardsR., Intrapersonal Communication, Social Cognition, and Imagined Interactions, in Intrapersonal Communication Processes, RobertsC.WatsonK. (eds.), Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 166–184, 1989.
28.
RoloffM. E.IfertD. E., Exploring the Role of Private Speech, Imagined Interaction and Serial Interaction in Mutual Influence, in Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol. 14, PalmerM. T. and BarrettG. A. (eds.), pp. 113–133, 1998.
29.
JonesE. E.GerardH. B., Foundations of Social Psychology, Wiley, New York, 1967.
30.
McCallG. H.SimmonsT., Identities and Interaction (Rev. Ed.), Free Press, New York, 1978.
31.
ClovenD. H.RoloffM. E., Sense-Making Activities and Interpersonal Conflict: Communicative Cues for the Mulling Blues, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, pp. 134–158, 1991.
32.
JohnsonK. L.RoloffM. E., Serial Arguing and Relational Quality: Determinants and Consequences of Perceived Resolvability, Communication Research, 25, pp. 327–343, 1998.
33.
HoneycuttJ. M., Typological Differences in Predicting Marital Happiness From Oral History Behaviors and Imagined Interactions, Communication Monographs, 66, pp. 275–291, 1999.
34.
ZagackiK. S.HoneycuttJ. M.EdwardsR., The Role of Mental Imagery and Emotion in Imagined Interaction, Communication Quarterly, 40, pp. 56–68, 1992.
35.
KlosD. S.SingerJ. L., Determinants of the Adolescent's Ongoing Thought Following Simulated Parental Confrontations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, pp. 975–987, 1981.
36.
GilliganS. G.BowerG. H., Cognitive Consequences of Emotional Arousal, in Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. IzardC. E.KaganJ.ZajoncR. B. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 547–588, 1984.
37.
RosenblattP. C.MeyerC., Imagined Interactions in the Family, Family Relations, 35, pp. 319–324, 1986.
38.
FloydF. J., Couples' Reactions to Communication Behaviors, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, pp. 523–532, 1988.
39.
HatfieldE., Passionate Love, Companionate Love, and Intimacy, in Intimacy, FisherM.StricklerG. (eds.), Plenum, New York, pp. 267–292, 1982.
40.
HoneycuttJ. M.BrownR., Did You Hear the One About? Typological and Spousal Differences in the Planning of Jokes and Sense of Humor in Marriage, Communication Quarterly, 46, pp. 1–11, 1998.
41.
ItoT. A.LarsenJ. T.SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T., Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 887–900, 1998.
42.
HoneycuttJ. M., Components and Functions of Communication during Initial Interaction with Extrapolations to Beyond, in Communication Yearbook, 16, DeetzS. A. (ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 461–490, 1993.
43.
InfanteD. A.ChandlerT. A.RuddJ. E., Test of an Argumentative Skill Deficiency Model of Interpersonal Violence, Communication Monographs, 56, pp. 163–177, 1989.
44.
InfanteD. A.RancerA. S., Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: A Review of Recent Theory and Research, in Communication Yearbook, 19, BurlesonB. (ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 319–351, 1996.
45.
InfanteD. A.WigleyC. J., Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure, Communication Monographs, 53, pp. 61–69, 1986.
46.
ZillmannD., Transfer of Excitation in Emotional Behavior, in Social Psychology A Sourcebook, CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (eds.), Guilford, New York, pp. 215–240, 1983.
47.
SabourinT. C.InfanteD. A.RuddJ. E., Verbal Aggression in Marriages: A Comparison of Violent, Distressed but Nonviolent, and Nondistressed Couples, Human Communication Research, 20, pp. 245–267, 1993.
48.
StrausM. A., Measuring Intrafamily Conflict: The Conflict Tactics (CTS) Scales, in Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families, StrausM. A.GellesR. J. (Eds.), Transactions Books, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 29–45, 1990.
49.
MurphyC. M.O'FarrellS., Factors Associated with Marital Aggression in Male Alcoholics, Journal of Family Psychology, 8, pp. 321–335, 1994.
50.
SmeijstersH., The Functions of Music in Music Therapy, in The Art and Science of Music Therapy: A Handbook, WigramT.SaperstonB., and WestR. (eds.), Publisher?, Location?, pp. 385–394, 1995.
51.
HoneycuttJ. M.EidenmullerM. E., Attributions about Communication and the Effects of Music on Conflict-Resolution among Couples, in Attribution, Communication Behavior, and Close Relationships, ManusovV.HarveyJ. H. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 37–60, 2001.
52.
McCroskeyJ. C., Why We Communicate the Way We Do: A Communibiological Perspective, speech delivered for The Carroll C. Arnold Distinguished Lecture of the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1997.
53.
BeattyM. J.McCroskeyJ. C.HeiselA. D., Communication Apprehension as Temperamental Expression: A Communibiological Paradigm, Communication Monographs, 65, pp. 197–219, 1998.
54.
BeattyM. J.McCroskeyJ. C., It's in Our Nature: Verbal Aggressiveness as Temperamental Expression, Communication Quarterly, 45, pp. 446–460, 1997.
55.
InfanteD. A., Teaching Students to Understand and Control Verbal Aggression, Communication Education, 44, pp. 51–63, 1995.
56.
GotcherJ. M.HoneycuttJ. M., An Analysis of Imagined Interactions of Forensic Participants, National Forensic Journal, 7, pp. 1–20, 1989.
57.
HoneycuttJ. M.GotcherJ. M., Influence of Imagined Interactions on Communicative Outcomes: The Case of Forensic Competition, in Mental Imagery, KunzendorfR. (ed.), Plenum, New York, pp. 139–143, 1991.
58.
PetressK. C., The Role Imagined Interactions Played in the Tian-an-men Square Student Demonstrations: An Analysis of Participants' Self-Reporting, paper presented at the American Association for the Study of Mental Imagery; Lowell, Massachusetts, June 1990.
59.
PetressK. C., Coping with a New Educational Environment: Chinese Students' Imagined Interactions before Commencing Studies in the US, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22, pp. 50–63, 1995.
60.
AllenT. H.HoneycuttJ. M., Planning, Imagined Interaction, and the Nonverbal Display of Anxiety, Communication Research, 24, pp. 64–82, 1997.
61.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V., Unmasking the Face, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1975.
62.
McCroskeyJ. C., The Communication Apprehension Approach, in Avoiding Communication, DaleyJ.McCroskeyJ. (eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, 1984.
63.
McCannR. M.HoneycuttJ. M., A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Imagined Interactions and Horizontal/Vertical and Individualistic/Collectivistic Cultural Patterns, paper presented at the annual National Communication Association Convention, Atlanta, November 2001.
64.
Ting-ToomeyS.GaoG.TrubiskyP.NishidaT.LinS.KimH., Self-Consciousness Dimensions and Conflict Styles in Five Cultures, paper presented at the Asian Regional Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1992.
65.
WetzelP. J., Are “Powerless” Communication Strategies the Japanese Norm?Language and Society, 17, pp. 555–564, 1988.
