This study describes and analyzes the pedagogical activities of two professional development models aimed at helping teachers effectively integrate technology in their classrooms. Most importantly, it investigates the impact of those activities on teacher learning and practice. Results of the study provide empirical evidence that links key components of professional development to changes in teacher knowledge, practices, and beliefs. Specifically, findings of the study indicate that both professional development models enabled participating teachers to: a) improve their technology proficiency, b) understand how to use technology as an instructional tool, c) incorporate technology into their professional and instructional practices, and d) reinforce and reconsider their beliefs toward teaching with technology. The study also offers much needed insights into the process by which teacher learning and change occur. The results of this study have significant implications for the design of in-service programs on the use of technology. They also include implications for policy and future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallD. L., & CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL. & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
BorkoH. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
3.
BorkoH., & PutnamR. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In GuskeyT. R. & HubermanM. (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms & practices (pp. 35–65). New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
CooneyT. J. (2001). Considering the paradoxes, perils, and purposes of conceptualizing teacher development. In LinF. L. (Ed.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 9–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5.
FishmanB. J.MarxR. W.BestS., & TalR. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658.
6.
FrankeM. L.CarpenterT. P.LeviL., & FennemaE. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.
7.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F., & YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.
8.
GreenT. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
GuskeyT. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
GuskeyT. R. (2003, April). the characteristics of effective professional development: A synthesis of lists. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
12.
HawleyW. D., & ValliL. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In Darling-HammondL. & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 125–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
HallG. E., & HordS. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14.
Loucks-HorsleyS.HewsonP. W.LoveN.MundryS., & StilesK. E. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
Margerum-LeysJ., & MarxR. W. (2003). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.
16.
McLaughlinM., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
17.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In CrantonP. (Ed.), Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice (pp. 5–12). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 74.
20.
MilesM. M., & HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
NesporJ. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.
22.
President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Retrieved June 10, 2005 from: http://www.ostp.gov/PCAST/k-12ed.html
23.
PutnamR. T., & BorkoH. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
24.
RichardsonV. (1994). Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
RichardsonV. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.
26.
RussellM.BebellD.O'DwyerL., & O'ConnorK. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.
27.
SandholtzJ.RingstaffC., & DwyerD. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
SchonD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
30.
SmylieM. A. (1989). Teachers' views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teach. The Elementary School Journal, 89(5), 543–558.
31.
SparksD., & Loucks-HorsleyS. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40–57.
32.
SupovitzJ. A., & TurnerH. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.
33.
ThompsonC. L., & ZeuliJ. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In Darling-HammondL. & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
34.
WilsonS. M., & BerneJ. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In NejadI. & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 173–209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
35.
YinR. K. (1993). Applications of case study research (paperback ed., Vol. 34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
