Most studies of inequalities and access to health care have used income as the sole indicator of social stratification. Despite the significance of social theory in health insurance research, there are no empirical studies comparing the ability of different models of social stratification to predict health insurance coverage. The aim of this study is to provide a comparative analysis using a variety of theory-driven indicators of social stratification and assess the relative strength of the association between these indicators and private health insurance. Data were collected in a 1993 telephone interview of a random digit dialing sample of the white population in the Baltimore Metropolitan Statistical Area. Indicators of social stratification included employment status, full-time work, education, occupation, industry, household income, firm size, and three types of assets: ownership, organizational, and skill/credential. The association between social stratification and private health insurance was strongest for those having higher household incomes, having attained at least a bachelor's degree, and working in a firm with more than 50 employees, followed by being an owner or manager, and by being employed. The addition of education and firm size improved the prediction of the household income model. The authors conclude that studies of inequalities in health insurance coverage can benefit from the inclusion of theory-driven indicators of social stratification such as human capital, labor market segmentation, and control over productive assets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GlaserW. A.The United States needs a health system like other countries. JAMA270: 980–984, 1993.
2.
SusserM.Health as a human right: An epidemiologist's perspective on the public health. Am. J. Public Health83: 418–126, 1993.
3.
AdayL. A.At Risk In America: The Health and Health Care Needs of Vulnerable Populations in the US. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1993.
4.
BurstinH. R.LipsitzS. R.BrennaT. A.Socioeconomic status and risk for substandard medical care. JAMA268: 2383–2387, 1992.
5.
FranksP.ClancyC. M.GoldM. R.Health insurance and mortality: Evidence from a National Cohort. JAMA270: 737–741, 1993.
6.
LastJ. M.WallaceR. B.Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Ed. 13. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, Conn., 1992.
7.
FriedmanE.The uninsured: From dilemma to crisis. JAMA265: 2491–2495, 1991.
8.
LevitK. R.OlinG. L.LetschS. W.Americans' health insurance coverage, 1980–91. Health Care Financ. Rev.14: 31–57, 1992.
9.
FoleyJ. D.Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 1992 Current Population Survey. SR-16, Issue Brief No. 133. Employee Benefit Research Institute, Washington, D.C., 1993.
10.
WeissmanJ. S.EpsteinA. M.Falling Through the Safety Net: Insurance Status and Access to Health Care. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994.
11.
CantorJ. C.Expanding health insurance coverage: Who will pay?J. Health Polit. Policy Law15: 755–778, 1990.
12.
DavisK.GoldM.MakucD.Access to health care for the poor: Does the gap remain. Ann. Rev. Public Health2: 159–182, 1981.
13.
FetherJ.HadleyJ.MullnerR.Falling through the cracks: Poverty, insurance coverage and hospital care for the poor, 1980–1982. Milbank Q. 62: 544–566, 1984.
14.
HaywardR. A.Inequities in health services among insured Americans: Do working-age adults have less access to medical care than the elderly?N. Engl. J. Med.318: 1507–1512, 1988.
15.
MarquisM. S.BuchananJ. L.How will changes in health insurance tax policy and employer health plan contributions affect access to health care and health care costs?JAMA271: 939–944, 1994.
16.
ShortP.MonheitA.BeauregardK.A Profile of Uninsured Americans. DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 89-3443. National Medical Expenditure Survey Research Findings 1. National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, Rockville, Md., 1989.
17.
SwartzK.Dynamics of people without health insurance: Don't let the numbers fool you. JAMA271: 64–66, 1994.
18.
MutchlerJ. E.BurrJ. A.Racial differences in health and health service utilization in later life: The effect of SES. J. Health Soc. Behav.32: 342–356, 1991.
19.
WrightE. O.Class Structure and Income Determination. Academic Press, New York, 1979.
20.
RobinsonR. V.KelleyJ.Class as conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf: Effects on income inequality, class consciousness, and class conflict in the U.S. and Great Britain. Am. Sociol. Rev.55: 827–841, 1979.
21.
SmithM. R.What is new in “new structuralist” analyses of earnings?Am. Sociol. Rev.55: 827–841, 1990.
22.
HalabyC. N.WeakliemD. L.Ownership and authority in the earnings function: Nonnested tests of alternative specifications. Am. Soc. Rev.58: 16–30, 1993.
23.
CalinicosA.HarmanC.The Changing Working Class. Bookmarks, Chicago, 1989.
24.
WrightE. O.Typologies, scales, and class analysis: A comment on Halaby and Weakliem. Am. Sociol. Rev.58: 31–34, 1993.
25.
WrightE. O.ChoD.The relative permeability of class boundaries to cross-class friendships: A comparative study of the United States, Canada, Sweden and Norway. Am. Sociol. Rev.57: 85–102, 1992.
26.
MuntanerC.Psychotic inpatients' social class and their admission to state or private psychiatric Baltimore hospitals. Am. J. Public Health84: 287–289, 1994.
27.
KriegerN.Racism, sexism, and social class: Implications for studies of health, disease, and well-being. Am. J. Prev. Med.9(Suppl. 6): 82–122, 1993.
28.
NavarroV.Race or class versus race and class: Mortality differentials in the United States. Lancet336: 1238–1240, 1990.
29.
LiberatesP.LinkB. G.KelseyJ. L.The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol. Rev.10: 87–121, 1988.
30.
SusserM.WatsonW.HopperK.Sociology in Medicine, Ed. 3. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.
31.
PappasG.The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960–1986. N. Engl. J. Med.329: 103–109, 1993.
32.
WilliamsD.Socioeconomic differentials in health: A review and a reformulation. Soc. Psychol. Q.53: 81–99, 1990.
33.
NavarroV.The Politics of Health Policy: The U.S. Reforms, 1980–1994. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass., 1994.
34.
WinklebyM. A.How education, income and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Public Health82: 816–820, 1992.
35.
LeighJ. P.FriesJ. F.Occupation, income, and education as independent covariates for arthritis in four national probability samples. Arthritis Rheum. 34: 984–995, 1991.
36.
KohnM. L.SchoolerC.Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification. Ablex, Norwood, N.J., 1983.
37.
BeckerG. S.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976.
38.
KallebergA.GriffinL.Class, occupation and inequality in job rewards. Am. J. Sociol.83:731–768, 1980.
39.
MarshallG.Classes in Modern Britain. Hutchinson, London, 1988.
40.
LazearE. J.Incentive contracts. In Allocation, Information and Markets, edited by EatwellJ.MilgateM.NewmanP., pp. 152–162. W. W. Norton, New York, 1989.
41.
CalvoG. A.WelliszS.Hierarchy, ability, and income distribution. J. Polit. Econ.87: 991–1010, 1979.
42.
WrightE. O.Classes. Verso, London, 1985.
43.
KohnM. L.Position in the class structure and psychological functioning in the United States, Japan, and Poland. Am. J. Sociol.95: 964–1008, 1990.
44.
GordonD. M.EdwardsR.ReichM.Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982.
45.
WaksbergJ.Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.73: 40–46, 1978.
46.
Survey Sampling, Inc. Unlisted Rates of the Top 100 MSAs for 1990. Fairfield, Conn., 1991.
47.
OlsonS. H.Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies. Am. J. Epidemiol.135: 210–222, 1992.
48.
HahnB.LefkowitzD.Annual Expenses and Sources of Payments for Health Care Services. AHCPR Publ. No. 93-0007. National Medical Expenditure Survey Research Findings 14. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, Rockville, Md., 1992.
49.
SmithT. W.Phone Home? An Analysis of Household Telephone Ownership. Paper presented at the International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology, Charlotte, N.C., November 1987.
50.
GreenlandS.Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am. J. Public Health79: 340–349, 1989.
51.
BreenC.ParsonsP. E.How the health care system influences access to care. Ann. Epidemiol.1996, in press.
52.
MishelL.BernsteinJ.The State of Working America 1992–1993. M. E. Sharpe, New York, 1993.
53.
SchorJ. B.The Overworked American. Basic Books, New York, 1992.
54.
FieldM. J.ShapiroH. T.Employment and Health Benefits: A Connection at Risk. Institute of Medicine, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., 1993.
55.
RennerC.NavarroV.Why is our population of uninsured and underinsured persons growing? The consequences of the “deindustrialization” of the United States. Int. J. Health Serv. 19: 433–442, 1989.
56.
OstroffC.The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. J. Appl. Psychol.77: 963–974, 1992.
57.
KriegerN.FeeE.Social class: The missing link in U.S. health data. Int. J. Health Serv. 24: 25–44, 1994.
58.
AlonsoW.StarrP.The Politics of Numbers. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1987.
59.
LaceyM. J.FurnerM. O.The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States. Woodrow Wilson Series, Washington, D.C., 1994.
60.
NavarroV.Why Congress did not enact the health care reform. J. Health Polit. Policy Law20: 455–62, 1995.
