This article outlines the development of interest in retention studies in Britain arising from a concern about the appropriate use of public money. It then describes the strategies being used to improve retention within the London Institute, a federation of five art and design focused colleges. Strategies described include study support, tutorial and professional development, including awareness raising, with academic staff. Many of these strategies have been developed in recent years in FE (community) colleges in Britain but our particular concern is to develop an overarching and interlinking strategy across a whole college rather than individual or sectional initiatives. This is what the British New Labour government calls “joined up policy.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission and OFSTED (1993). Unfinished business: Full time educational courses for 16–19 year olds. London: HMSO.
2.
BlythmanM., & OrrS. (2000). Have you got ten minutes? Can you just sort my dissertation? Proceedings of the 6th Annual Writing Development in Higher Education Annual Conference 1999. Leicester: WDHE.
3.
BeanJ. (1982). Student attrition, intentions, and confidence interaction effects in a path model. Research in Higher Education, 17 (4), 291–320.
4.
BourdieP (1997). The forms of capital. In (ed.) HalseyA. H.LauderH.BrownP., & WellsA. S. (Eds.), Education: Culture economy and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BrownR. (1998). The post Dearing agenda for quality and standards in higher education. London: Institute of Education.
6.
CohenL., & ManionL. (1980). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
7.
CongosD. H., & SchoepsN. (1999) Methods to determine the impact of SI programmes on Colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Retention1 (1), 59–82.
8.
CVCP (1998). From elitism to inclusion: Good practice in widening access to higher education. Main Report. London: CVCP.
9.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (1998). Strategies of qualitative enquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10.
EvansC. (1993). English people: The experience of teaching and learning English in British universities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
11.
Further Education Funding Council (1994). Funding learning. Coventry: FEFC.
12.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Towards an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
13.
GreenD. (1994). What is quality in higher education? Concepts, policy and practice. In GreenD. (Ed.), What is quality in higher education?Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.
14.
HarrisR. & ThorpD. (1999). Language, culture and learning: Some missing dimensions to EAP. In BoolH. & LyfordP. (Eds.), Academic standards and expectations: The role of EAP. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
15.
HM Inspectorate (1991). Student completion rates in further education courses. DES 281/91/ns. London: DES.
16.
KemmisS. (1993). Action research. In HammersleyM. (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues. London: Chapman.
17.
KenwrightH. (1996). Developing retention strategies. Did they fall or were they pushed?York: York College of Further and Higher Education.
18.
KenwrightH. (1997). Holding out the safety net: Retention strategies in further education. York: York College of Further and Higher Education.
19.
MartinezP. (1995). Student retention in further and adult education: The evidence. Blagdon: FEDA.
20.
MartinezP. (1996). Student retention: Case studies of strategies that work. Blagdon: FEDA.
21.
MartinezP. (1997). Improving student retention: A guide to successful strategies. Blagdon: FEDA.
22.
MartinezP., & MundayF. (1998). 9000 Voices: Student persistence and drop out in further education. Blagdon: FEDA.
23.
National Committee for Enquiry into Higher Education (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Norwich: HMSO.
24.
NiasJ. (1993). Primary teachers talking: A reflexive account of longitudinal research. In HammersleyM. (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues. London: Chapman.
25.
NoraA. (1987). Determinants of retention among Chicano students: A structural model. Research in Higher Education, 26 (1), 31–59.
PascarellaE. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and researchVol. 1. New York: Agathon Press.
28.
PhillipsD. C. (1993). Subjectivity and objectivity: An objective inquiry. In HammersleyM. (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues. London: Chapman.
29.
SchonD. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Times Higher Educational Supplement. (1999, December 3), Performance indicators.
31.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
TuckerJ. E. (1999). Tinto's model and successful college transitions. Journal of College Student Retention, 1 (2), 163–175.
