The author presents a labor process analysis of recent changes in nursing work on hospital wards. In the immediate post–World War II decades, hospital nursing was organized to include stratified nurses—registered and auxiliary nurses (licensed practical nurses and nurses' aides)—in a common labor process called “team nursing.” Team nursing adapted Taylorist principles to sharply demarcate tasks between registered nurses (RNs) and auxiliaries. In the 1970s and 1980s, team nursing was increasingly replaced by “primary nursing” with a majority of RNs. Auxiliaries were displaced as RNs assumed undivided responsibility for complete nursing care. The transition to primary nursing is partly explained through the convergence of managerial interests with the professionalizing interests of nursing's elite. However, primary nursing was not simply imposed from the top down. Team nursing produced divisiveness between RNs and auxiliaries at the same time that it forced these workers to violate the official differentiation of tasks and held RNs responsible for work performed by auxiliaries. Primary nursing eliminates the problems of team nursing as RNs perform reunified tasks in an unmediated RN–patient relationship. However, primary nursing has produced a new set of contradictions, including an intensified labor process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1988, Ed. 108, pp. 379–380. Washington, D.C., 1987.
2.
AriesN.KennedyL.The health labor force: The effects of change. In The Sociology of Health and Illness, edited by ConradP.KernR., pp. 196–207. St. Martin's Press, New York, 1986.
3.
BravermanH.Labor and Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1974.
4.
HermanA.Conceptualizing control: Domination and hegemony in the capitalist labor process. The Insurgent Sociologist9(3): 7–22, 1982.
5.
BurawoyM.Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1979.
6.
EdwardsR.Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. Basic Books, New York, 1979.
7.
FriedmanA. L.Industry and Labour. MacMillan, London, 1977.
8.
WagnerD.The proletarianization of nursing in the United States, 1932–1946. Int. J. Health Serv. 10(2): 271–290, 1980.
9.
WhiteR. (ed.). Political Issues in Nursing: Past, Present, and Future, p. ix. Wiley, Chichester, England, 1985.
10.
ReverbyS.The search for the hospital yardstick: Nursing and rationalization of hospital work. In Health Care in America: Essays in Social History, edited by ReverbyS.RosnerD., pp. 206–225. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1979.
11.
MeloshB.The Physician's Hand: Work Culture and Conflict in American Nursing. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1982.
12.
GrayD.Militancy, unionism, and gender ideology: A study of hospital nurses. Work and Occupations16(2): 137–152, 1989.
13.
CoburnD.The development of Canadian nursing: Professionalization and proletarianization. Int. J. Health Serv. 18(3): 437–456, 1988.
14.
GlazerN.Overlooked, overworked: Women's unpaid and paid work in the health services' “cost crisis.”Int. J. Health Serv. 18(1): 119–137, 1988.
15.
BrannonR. L.The Production of Care: The Hospital Industry and the Nursing Labor Process. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1988.
16.
AshleyJ.Hospitals, Paternalism, and the Role of the Nurse, pp. 16–33. Teachers College Press, New York, 1976.
17.
WeinerL.From Working Girl to Working Mother: The Female Labor Force in the United States, 1880–1980, p. 14. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1985.
18.
KatzmanD. M.Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America, Table A-3. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1981.
19.
CanningsK.LazonickW.The development of the nursing labor force in the United States: A basic analysis. In Organization of Health Workers and Labor Conflict, edited by WolfeS., pp. 83–114. Baywood, Amityville, N.Y., 1978.
20.
BrownE. L.Nursing for the Future: A Report Prepared for the National Nursing Council. Russell Sage, New York, 1948.
21.
Committee on the Function of Nursing. A Program for the Nursing Profession. MacMillan, New York, 1948.
22.
WrennR.Management and work humanization. The Insurgent Sociologist11(3): 23–38, 1982.
23.
LambertsenE. C.Nursing Team Organization and Functioning. Columbia University Teachers College, New York, 1953.
24.
HughesE. C.HughesH. M.DeutscherI.Twenty Thousand Nurses Tell Their Story: A Report on Studies of Nursing Functions Sponsored by the American Nurses' Association. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1958.
25.
California State Nurses' Association. Nursing Practice in California Hospitals. San Francisco, 1953.
26.
DemingD.The Practical Nurse, pp. 70–71. The Commonwealth Fund, New York, 1947.
27.
HughesE. C.Men and Their Work, pp. 131–138. Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1958.
28.
HughesE. C.The Sociological Eye, pp. 304–315. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, 1971.
29.
JoinerC.van ServellenG. M.Job Enrichment in Nursing: A Guide to Improving Morale, Productivity, and Retention. Aspen Systems, Rockville, Md., 1984.
30.
AikenL. H.BlendonR. J.The national nurse shortage. National J. 13(21): 948–953, 1981.
31.
AikenL.Breaking the shortage cycles. Am. J. Nurs.87: 1616–1620, 1987.
32.
SweezyP.MagdoffH.The logic of stagnation. Monthly Rev. 38(5): 1–19, 1986.
33.
FuchsV. R.The Health Economy, Table 17.2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.
34.
New York Times, March 3, 1985, p. 11.
35.
LeyerleB.Moving and Shaking American Medicine: The Structure of a Socioeconomic Transformation. Greenwood, Westport, Conn., 1984.
36.
KotelchuckR.In the grip of PPS: How prospective payment is transforming hospital care. Health Pac Bull. 17(1): 7–10, 1986.
37.
ChernomasR.ChernomasW.Escalation of the nurse-physician conflict. Int. J. Health Serv. 19(4): 635–650, 1989.
38.
McClureM.NelsonM.Trends in hospital nursing. In Nursing in the 1980s: Crises, Opportunities, Challenges, edited by AikenL. H., pp. 59–73. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1982.
39.
HancockW. M.A cost and staffing comparison of an all-RN staff and team nursing. Nurs. Admin. Q.8(2): 45–61, 1984.
40.
LarsonM. S.The Rise of Professionalism. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1977.
41.
AlfanoG. J. (ed.). The All-RN Nursing Staff. Nursing Resources, Wakefield, Mass., 1980.
StraussA.Social Organization of Medical Work, pp. 26, 151, 155. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985.
54.
MechanicD.Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Q.7(3): 349–364, 1962.
55.
ReissmanL.RohrerJ. H. (eds.). Change and Dilemma in the Nursing Profession: Studies of Nursing Services in a Large General Hospital, pp. 107–108. G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1957.
56.
ButterI. H.Gender hierarchies in the health labor force. Int. J. Health Serv. 17(1): 133–149, 1987.
57.
ThompsonP.The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process, p. 165. MacMillan, London, 1983.
58.
S. F. strikers set pace. Am. J. Nurs.87:1365, 1987.
59.
MantheyM.Can primary nursing survive?Am. J. Nurs.88: 644–647, 1988.
60.
Hospitals seek support. Am. J. Nurs.88:1412, 1988.
61.
LeviM.Functional redundancy and the process of professionalization: The case of registered nurses in the United States. J. Health Polit. Policy Law5(2): 333–353, 1980.
62.
American Nurses' Association. Facts About Nursing, 84–85, Tables 1.4, 1.76. Kansas City, 1985.
63.
MillerR. U.Hospitals. In Collective Bargaining: Contemporary American Experience, edited by SomersG. G., pp. 373–433. Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wis., 1980.
64.
American Nurses' Association. The American Nurse, September 1985, p. 1.
65.
American Nurses' Association. The American Nurse, June 1987, p. 13.
