The author discusses the need for a better theoretical understanding of friendship in order for its role in the lives of elderly people to be understood. The applicability to friendship of Simmel's approach to the study of social relationships is outlined. From this perspective, types of friendship are determined by the physical distance separating friends and the emotional closeness bringing them together. The data consist of seventy in-depth interviews of senior, unmarried women in a middle-class community bordering on Chicago. Qualitative data are reported to support quantitative analyses. There were positive relationships between emotional closeness and physical distance, duration and emotional closeness, and frequency of interaction and proximity. The author describes the implications for elderly women of the tendency for their close, old friends to be physically separated from them and their neighbors to be casual friends, but constant companions. The author discusses the effects of the age-density of residential context and life history on the types of friends the women had.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HochschildA. R., The Unexpected Community, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
2.
CantorM. H., Neighbors and Friends, Research on Aging, 1:4, pp. 434–463, 1979.
3.
LopataH. Z., Women as Widows, Elsevier, New York, 1979.
4.
GoldmanS., Social Aging, Disorganization, and the Loss of Choice, The Gerontologist, 11:2, Part I, pp. 158–162, 1971.
5.
RosowI., Social Integration of the Aged, The Free Press, New York, 1967.
6.
WilliamsR., Friendship and Social Values in a Suburban Community, Pacific Sociological Review, 2:1, pp. 3–10, 1959.
7.
CohenC. I. and RajkowskiH., What's in a Friend? Substantive and Theoretical Issues, The Gerontologist, 22:3, pp. 261–266, 1982.
8.
RosenbergG. S., The Worker Grows Old, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francsico, 1970.
9.
DotsonF., Patterns of Voluntary Association Among Urban Working Class Families, American Sociological Review, 16:5, pp. 687–693, 1951.
10.
LaumannE. O., Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973.
11.
CroweP. W., “Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: Social Networks at Three Levels of Urbanization in Tirol, Austria,” doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 1978.
12.
JacobsonD., Friendship and Mobility in the Development of an Urban Elite African Social System, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24:2, pp. 123–138, 1968.
13.
LevineD. N.CarterE. B., and GormanE. M., Simmel's Influence on American Sociology I, American Journal of Sociology, 81:4, pp. 813–845, 1976.
14.
SimmelG., The Stranger, in On Individuality and Social Forms, LevineD. N. (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 143–149, 1971.
15.
BogardusE. S., Social Distance, Antioch, Yellow Springs, OH, 1959.
16.
GoffmanE., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday and Company, Inc., Garden City, NY, 1959.
17.
McFarlandD. and BrownD., Social Distance As a Metric: A Systematic Introduction to Smallest Space Analysis, in Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks, LaumannE. O. (ed.), Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 213–253, 1973.
18.
WestieF. R., Negro-White Status Differentials and Social Distance, American Sociological Review, 17:5, pp. 550–558, 1952.
19.
WestieF. R., A Technique for the Measurement of Race Attitudes, American Sociological Review, 18:1, pp. 73–78, 1953.
20.
PooleW. C., Distance in Sociology, American Journal of Sociology, 33:1, pp. 99–104, 1927.
21.
KadushinC., Social Distance Between Client and Professional, American Journal of Sociology, 67:5, pp. 517–531, 1962.
22.
LazarsfeldP. F. and MertonR. K., Friendship As Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis, in Freedom and Control in Modern Society, BergerM. (ed.), Van Nostrand, New York, pp. 18–66, 1954.
23.
AlbertR. S. and BriganteT. R., The Psychology of Friendship Relations: Social Factors, Journal of Social Psychology, 56:1, pp. 33–47, 1962.
24.
CoelhoG. V., A Guide to the Literature of Friendship: A Selectively Annotated Bibliography, Psychology Newsletter, 10, pp. 365–394, 1959.
25.
IzardC. E., Personality Similarity and Friendship, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61:1, pp. 47–51, 1960.
26.
IzardC. E., Personality Similarity and Friendship: A Follow-up Study, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:6, pp. 598–600, 1963.
27.
FarisE., The Primary Group: Essence and Accident, American Journal of Sociology, 37:1, pp. 41–50, 1932.
28.
Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, 1980 Census: Tables on Oak Park, Illinois, computer printout, 1981.
29.
HomansG. C., The Human Group, Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York, 1950.
30.
PalisiB. J., Ethnic Patterns of Friendship, Phylon, 27:3, pp. 217–225, 1966.
31.
HessB., Friendship, in Aging and Society: A Sociology of Age Stratification, Vol. 3, RileyM. W.JohnsonM., and FonerA. (eds.), Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 357–393, 1972.
32.
PriestR. F. and SawyerJ., Proximity and Peership: Bases of Balance in Interpersonal Attraction, American Journal of Sociology, 72:6, pp. 633–649, 1967.
33.
LopataH. Z., Social Relations of Black and White Widowed Women in a Northern Metropolis, American Journal of Sociology, 78:4, pp. 1003–1020, 1973.
34.
BradburnN., Structure of Psychological Well-Being, Aldine, Chicago, 1969.
35.
CarpF. M., Housing and Living Environments of Older People, in Handbook on Aging and the Social Sciences, BinstockR. H. and ShanasE. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, pp. 244–271, 1976.
36.
HorowitzM. J. and SchultzR., The Relocation Controversy: Criticism and Commentary on Five Recent Studies, The Gerontologist, 23:3, pp. 229–234, 1983.
