Age-related differences in three temperament (Trait Pleasure-displeasure, Trait Arousability, Trait-Dominance-submissiveness), and four personality (Achieving Tendency, Conformity, Shyness, Loneliness), scales were explored in three studies. Results, generally, were consistent with the hypothesis that scores on Trait Dominance and on trait measures that correlated positively with Trait Dominance (e.g., achievement) were lower for older persons. Achieving Tendency (assessed in Studies One and Three) was lower for older persons. Trait Dominance (assessed in 2 studies) was lower for older men and women in Study Two and lower for older women only in Study Three. In Study Three, two strong negative correlates of Trait Dominance (Conformity, Shyness) were higher for older women. Based on a consistent absence of age/Trait Pleasure relationships, no age-related differences in psychological adjustment-maladjustment were implied by the findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R., Set Like Plaster: Evidence for the Stability of Adult Personality, in Can Personality Change?HeathertonT. F.WeinbergerJ. L. (eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 21–40, 1994.
2.
VeroffJ.ReumanD.FeldS., Motives in American Men and Women across the Adult Life Span, Developmental Psychology, 20, pp. 1142–1158, 1984.
3.
FultzN. H.HerzogA. R., Gender Differences in Affiliation and Instrumentality across Adulthood, Psychology and Aging, 6, pp. 579–586, 1991.
4.
BuhlerC.BrindA.HomerA., Old Age as a Phase of Human Life, Human Development, 11, pp. 53–63, 1968.
5.
ProhaskaT. R.ParhamI. A.TeitelmanJ., Age Differences in Attributions to Causality: Implications for Intellectual Assessment, Experimental Aging Research, 10, pp. 111–117, 1984.
6.
MehrabianA.BankL., A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Achieving Tendency, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, pp. 475–478, 1978.
7.
MehrabianA., Measures of Individual Differences in Temperament, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, pp. 1105–1117, 1978.
8.
MehrabianA., Eating Characteristics and Temperament: General Measures and Interrelationships, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.
9.
MehrabianA., Outline of a General Emotion-Based Theory of Temperament, in Explorations in Temperament: International Perspectives on Theory and Measurement, StrelauJ.AngleitnerA. (eds.), Plenum, New York, pp. 75–86, 1991.
10.
MehrabianA.O'ReillyE., Analysis of Personality Measures in Terms of Basic Dimensions of Temperament, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, pp. 492–503, 1980.
11.
MehrabianA.BernathM. S., Factorial Composition of Commonly Used Self-Report Depression Inventories: Relationships with Basic Dimensions of Temperament, Journal of Research in Personality, 25, pp. 262–275, 1991.
12.
MehrabianA., A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Stimulus Screening and Associated Differences in Arousability, Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1, pp. 89–103, 1977.
13.
MehrabianA.HinesM., A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Dominance-Submissiveness, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, pp. 479–484, 1978.
14.
MehrabianA., Theory and Evidence Bearing on a Scale of Trait Arousability, Current Psychology, 14, pp. 3–28, 1995.
15.
MehrabianA., Evidence Bearing on the Affiliative Tendency (MAFF) and Sensitivity to Rejection (MSR) Scales, Current Psychology, 13, pp. 97–116, 1994.
16.
MehrabianA.WeinsteinL., Temperament Characteristics of Suicide Attempters, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, pp. 544–546, 1985.
17.
MehrabianA.BekkenM. L., Temperament Characteristics of Individuals Who Participate in Strenuous Sports, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, pp. 160–166, 1986.
18.
MehrabianA., Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance: A General Framework for Describing and Measuring Individual Differences in Temperament, Current Psychology, 14, pp. 261–292, 1996.
19.
GoldbergL. R., The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure, Psychological Assessment, 4, pp. 26–42, 1992.
20.
MehrabianA., Relationships among Three General Approaches to Personality Description, Journal of Psychology, 129, pp. 565–581, 1995.
21.
MehrabianA., Individual Differences in Achieving Tendency: Review of Evidence Bearing on a Questionnaire Measure, Current Psychology, 13, pp. 351–364, 1994–95.
22.
LachmanM. E.LeffR., Perceived Control and Intellectual Functioning in the Elderly: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study, Developmental Psychology, 25, pp. 722–728, 1989.
23.
LawtonM. P.KlebanM. H.RajagopalD.DeanJ., Dimensions of Affective Experience in Three Age Groups, Psychology and Aging, 7, pp. 171–184, 1992.
24.
CarstensenL. L., Social and Emotional Patterns in Adulthood: Support for Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, Psychology and Aging, 7, pp. 331–338, 1992.
25.
MehrabianA.SteflC. A., Basic Temperament Components of Loneliness, Shyness, and Conformity, Social Behavior and Personality, 23, pp. 253–264, 1995.
26.
MehrabianA., Manual for the Revised Achieving Tendency Scale (MACH), 1994. (Available from Albert Mehrabian, Department of Psychology, UCLA, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024.)
27.
CattellR. B., The Meaning and Strategic Use of Factor Analysis, in Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, CattellR. B. (ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966.
28.
EisenbergN.LennonR., Sex Differences in Empathy and Related Capacities, Psychological Bulletin, 94, pp. 100–131, 1983.
29.
MehrabianA.YoungA. L.SatoS., Emotional Empathy and Associated Individual Differences, Current Psychology: Research & Reviews, 7, pp. 221–240, 1988.
30.
RussellD.PeplauL. A.CutronaC. E., The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and Discriminant Validity Evidence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, pp. 472–480, 1980.
31.
CheekJ. M., The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale, unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College, 1983.
32.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B., Manual for the Eysenck Personality Inventory, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, California, 1968.
