Sex of the Face in Western Art: Left and Right in Portraits

Abstract

The relationship between observers' taste and the sitter's face orientation as function of sitter sex in painted portraits was investigated. The historical tendency in portraiture is that the sitter's left side of the face is more likely than the right to be turned towards the viewer and this side bias is stronger with women than with men. Correctly oriented and reversed museum portraits were viewed by subjects who gave ratings of “liking” the portrait as a whole (Experiment 1) and for “attractiveness” of the sitter (Experiment 2). Only portraits of women showed a left-right difference with right favored significantly over left, irrespective of orientation or type of rating. These findings go against the historical pattern of the sex-related bias in portraiture. They suggest that most women are painted in an orientation which is less favorable to them.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McManus

I. C.

and Humphrey

N. K.

, Turning the Left Cheek, Nature, 243, pp. 271–272, 1973.

Tilby

A. W.

, The Origin of Right, The Nineteenth Century and After, 107, pp. 122–140, 1930.

Uhrbrock

R. S.

, Laterality in Art, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32, pp. 27–35, 1973.

Corlett

, Left Cheek, New Scientist, 59, p. 581, 1973.

Gordon

I. E.

, Left and Right in Art, in Psychology and the Arts, O'Hare

(ed.), Humanities Press, Brighton, pp. 211–241, 1981.

LaBar

, Turning the Left Cheek Examined using Modern Photography, Nature, 245, p. 338, 1973.

Coles

P. R.

, Profile Orientation and Social Distance in Portrait Painting, Perception, 3, pp. 303–308, 1974.

Benjafield

and Segalowitz

S. J.

, Left and Right in Leonardo's Drawings of Faces, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, pp. 25–32, 1993.

Beaumont

J. G.

, Lateral Organization and Aesthetic Preference: The Importance of Peripheral Visual Asymmetries, Neuropsychologia, 23, pp. 103–113, 1985.

10.

Lindauer

M. S.

, Perceived and Preferred Orientations of Abstract Art, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 5, pp. 47–58, 1987.

11.

Regard

and Landis

, Beauty May Differ in Each Half of the Eye of the Beholder, in Beauty and the Brain, Rentschler

Herzberger

, and Epstein

(eds.), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1989.

12.

Cunningham

M. R.

, Measuring the Physical in Physical Attractiveness: Quasi-Experiments on the Sociobiology of Women Facial Beauty, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 925–935, 1986.

13.

Laughery

K. R.

Alexander

J. F.

, and Lane

A. B.

, Recognition of Human Faces: Effects of Target Exposure Time, Target Position, Pose Position, and Type of Photograph, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, pp. 477–483, 1971.

14.

Gilbert

and Bakan

, Visual Asymmetry in Perception of Faces, Neuropsychologia, 11, pp. 355–362, 1973.

15.

Campbell

, Asymmetries in Moving Faces, British Journal of Psychology, 73, pp. 95–103, 1982.