The manner in which the popular press represents health issues influences, and is demonstrative of, societal attitudes toward illnesses and those who suffer from them. Cancer is one of the most feared diseases in modern society, and breast cancer attacks women at the bodily site where notions of femininity intersect. This article examines the discourses surrounding breast cancer as represented in the Australian press in the period between 1987 and 1990. It is argued that the press's portrayal of breast cancer during that time drew upon dominant cultural metaphors and discourses concerning femininity, the individual's responsibility for illness, and medical and technological dominance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
van DijkT. A.Racism and the Press. Routledge, London, 1991.
2.
NelkinD.Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1987.
3.
KlaidmanS.Health in the Headlines: The Stories Behind the Stories. Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.
4.
LuptonD.Ideology and news reporting. Media Information Australia65: 28–35, 1992.
5.
MartinE.The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, U.K., 1989.
6.
MartinE.Toward an anthropology of immunology: The body as nation state. Med. Anthropol. Q.4(4): 410–426, 1990.
7.
JuhaszA.The contained threat: Women in mainstream AIDS documentary. J. Sex Res. 27(1): 25–46, 1990.
8.
KingD.“Prostitutes as pariah in the age of AIDS”: A content analysis of coverage of women prostitutes in the New York Times and the Washington Post September 1985–April 1988. Women Health16(3/4): 155–176, 1990.
9.
ChrislerJ. C.LevyK. B.The media construct a menstrual monster: A content analysis of PMS articles in the popular press. Women Health16(2): 89–104, 1990.
10.
NobleC.BellP.Reproducing women's nature: Media constructions of IVF and related issues. Aust. J. Soc. Issues27(1): 17–30, 1992.
11.
GiffordS.The meaning of lumps: A case study of the ambiguities of risk. In Anthropology and Epidemiology: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Health and Disease, edited by JanesC. R.StallR.GiffordS. M., pp. 213–246. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1986.
12.
ErwinD. O.The militarization of cancer treatment in American society. In Encounters with Biomedicine: Case Studies in Medical Anthropology, edited by BaerH. A., pp. 201–227. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1987.
13.
PattersonJ. T.The Dread Disease: Cancer and Modern American Culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1987.
14.
SontagS.Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors. Anchor, New York, 1989.
15.
GoodM. J. DelvecchioAmerican oncology and the discourse on hope. Cult. Med. Psychiatry14: 59–79, 1990.
16.
SteinH. F.American Medicine as Culture. Westview, Boulder, Colo., 1990.
17.
MitchellH.Organised mammographic screening programmes: A benign or malignant neglect?Med. J. Aust.146: 87–90, 1987.
18.
SkrabanekP.Mass mammography: Time for a reappraisal. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care5: 423–430, 1989.
19.
RobertsM. M.Breast screening: Time for a rethink?Br. Med. J.299: 1153–1154, 1989.
20.
WhatleyM. H.WorcesterN.The role of technology in the co-option of the women's health movement: The case of osteoporosis and breast cancer screening. In Healing Technology: Feminist Perspectives, edited by RatcliffK.University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1989.
21.
LuptonD.The establishment of mass mammographic screening programs: In whose interests?Aust. J. Soc. Issues27(2): 112–125, 1992.
22.
GilesG. G.ArmstrongB. K.SmithL. R.Cancer in Australia 1982. National Cancer Statistics Clearing House Scientific Publication No. 1. Canberra, 1987.
23.
KearsleyJ. H.Mammography in 1986: Keeping abreast of the times. Med. J. Aust.145: 181–182, 1986.
24.
CalnanM.Women and medicalisation: An empirical examination of the extent of women's dependence on medical technology in the early detection of breast cancer. Soc. Sci. Med.18(7): 561–569, 1986.
25.
Barger-LuxM. J.HeaneyR. P.For better and worse: The technological imperative in health care. Soc. Sci. Med.22(12): 1313–1320, 1986.
26.
MontgomeryS. L.Codes and combat in biomedical discourse. Science As Culture2(3): 341–391, 1991.
27.
WiklerD. I.Persuasion and coercion for health: Ethical issues in government efforts to change life-styles. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 56(3): 303–339, 1978.
28.
SkrabanekP.Preventive medicine and morality. Lancet1: 143–144, January 18, 1986.
29.
FadenR. R.Ethical issues in government sponsored public health campaigns. Health Educ. Q.14(1): 27–37, 1987.
30.
DuncanP.To screen or not to screen? A question of ethics. Health Educ. J.49(3): 120–122, 1990.
31.
LuptonD.Risk as moral danger: The social and political functions of risk discourse in public health. Int. J. Health Serv. 23(3): 425–435, 1993.
32.
BainesC. J.Ruminations on breast cancer. Chron. Dis. Can.11(2): 20–21, 1990.
33.
PosnerT.What's in a smear: Cervical screening, medical signs and metaphors. Science As Culture2(2): 167–187, 1991.
34.
StanworthM. (ed.). Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1987.
35.
WajcmanJ.Feminism Confronts Technology. Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1991.
36.
Boston Women's Health Collective. New Our Bodies Ourselves. Penguin, Ringwood, Victoria, 1985.
37.
LewinE.OlesonV. (eds.). Women, Health and Healing: Toward a New Perspective. Tavistock, New York, 1985.
38.
NelkinD.GilmanS. L.Placing blame for devastating disease. Soc. Res.55(3): 361–378, 1988.
39.
CrawfordR.You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. Int. J. Health Serv. 7(4): 663–680, 1977.
40.
TeshS.Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, 1988.
41.
BrownmillerS.Femininity. Fawcett Columbine, New York, 1984.
42.
SpenceJ.Putting Myself in the Picture: A Political, Personal and Photographic Autobiography. Camden Press, London, 1986.
43.
WellingsK.Help or hype: An analysis of media coverage of the 1983 “Pill scare.” In Health Education and the Media II, edited by LeatharD., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1985.
