In recent years the WIC program, a federal nutrition program for poor mothers and babies, has become a major playing field for ideological forces hoping to shape public opinion and Congressional action on matters of domestic social policy. WIC's highly positive benefits have been distorted, research results from its scientific evaluation altered by high-level federal officials, and its public support undermined by an academic spokesman with ties to the White House and a stated desire to kill the program. While strong bipartisan support on Capitol Hill makes it likely that WIC will survive and even grow, distortion of its record provides insight into how ideological forces contaminate the well of reasoned discourse for their preconceived ends.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bureau of the Census. Money Income and Poverty Status in the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1989.
2.
Congressional Budget Office. Estimated Costs to Provide Full Funding to the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC). Washington, D.C., March 13, 1991.
3.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. WIC Program Participation for 1990. Washington, D.C., 1991.
4.
RushD.The National WIC Evaluation: Evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.47: 412–511, 1988.
5.
Physician Task Force on Hunger in America. Hunger in America: The Growing Epidemic. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Conn., 1985.
6.
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. The Savings in Medicaid Costs for Newborns and Their Mothers from Prenatal Participation in the WIC Program. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation. Washington, D.C., 1990.
7.
Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives. Testimony before the committee (joint and individual statements). Washington, D.C., March 6, 1991.
8.
GrahamG.WIC: A food program that fails. The Public Interest, Spring 1991.
9.
SchanbergS.Is anybody hungry?The New York Times, January 10, 1984.
10.
GrahamG.Testimony before the Subcommittee on Nutrition, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, U.S. Senate.Washington, D.C., February 22 and 23, 1982, pp. 54–103.
11.
GrahamG.GreenfieldB.Testimony before the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, U.S. Senate.Washington, D.C., February 22, 1982.
12.
GrahamG.Personal letter to Vice President George Bush. July 31, 1981.
13.
GrahamG.Oversight Hearings on Meal Pattern Changes in the School Lunch Program, Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary and Vocational Education, House Committee on Education and Labor. Washington, D.C., September 17 and 18, 1981.
14.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. George Graham's Critique of the WIC Program. Unpublished report. Washington, D.C., April 1991.
15.
HughsD.The Health of America's Children, p. 90. Children's Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., 1989.
16.
General Accounting Office. PEND 84-4, January 30, 1984.
17.
PeterkinB.HammaM.Food shopping skills of the rich and the poor. Fam. Econ. Rev., No. 3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1983.
18.
PeterkinB.Nutritional adequacy of the diets of low-income households. J. Nutr. Educ.44(3), 1982.
19.
Physician Task Force on Hunger in America. Increasing Hunger and Declining Help: Barriers to Participation in the Food Stamp Program. Unpublished report. Harvard University, Boston, Mass., May 1986.
20.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Soup Lines and Food Baskets. Washington, D.C., May 1983.
21.
GortmakerS.Increasing pediatric obesity in the U.S. Am. J. Dis. Child.141: 535–540, 1987.
22.
MetcoffJ.Effect of food supplementation (WIC) during pregnancy on birth weight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.41: 933–947, 1985.
23.
KennedyE.KotelchuckM.The effect of WIC Supplemental Feeding on birth weight: A case-control analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.40: 579–585, 1984.
24.
TrowbridgeF. L.Prevalence of growth stunting and obesity: Pediatric nutrition surveillance. MMWR32: 23SS–26SS, 1983.
25.
OatisP.Nutritional status in hospitalized children: Effects of socio-economic status [Abstract 563]. Pediatr. Res.16(1): 172a, 1982.
26.
MitchellW.Failure to thrive: A study in primary care settings. Pediatrics65: 971–976, 1980.
27.
RossouwJ.Kwashiorkor in America. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.49: 588–592, 1989.
28.
RichS.500,000 Children may suffer malnutrition, study shows. Washington Post, January 12, 1984.
29.
National Education Association. The Relationship between Nutrition and Learning. Washington, D.C., 1989.
30.
Food Research and Action Center. Fuel for Excellence. Washington, D.C., 1990.
31.
MeyersA.School breakfast program and school performance. Am. J. Dis. Child.143, October 1989.
32.
HabicH.Height and weight standards for pre-school children: How relevant are ethnic differences to growth potential. Lancet1: 611–614, 1974.
33.
World Health Organization. Measuring Changes in Nutritional Status. Geneva, 1983.
34.
DrotarD. (ed.). New Directions in Failure to Thrive. Plenum Press, New York, 1984.
35.
KotzN.Let Them Eat Promises. Doubleday, New York, 1971.
36.
ColesR.HugeH.The FBI on the trail of the hunger-mongers. The New Republic159 (25–26), December 21, 1968.
37.
BrownL.Hunger USA: The public pushes Congress. J. Health Soc. Behav.11(2), June 1970.
38.
Proceedings of The 20th Anniversary Commemoration of the White House Conference on Food, Nutrition and Health. Washington, D.C., November 8, 1989.
39.
RushD.Testimony before the House Select Committee on Hunger and the Senate Agriculture Committee. Washington, D.C., June 24, 1990.
40.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation. The National WIC Evaluation. Washington, D.C., 1986.
41.
OliphantT.Feeding the hungry: Obscuring the good news. The Boston Globe, March 10, 1986.
42.
Social and Scientific Systems, Inc. Report on Nine Case Studies of Emergency Food Assistance Programs. Report prepared under contract with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C., May, 1983.
43.
Public Broadcasting System. Macneil/Lehrer News Hour. January 14, 1986.
44.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Monthly program participation reports. Washington, D.C., various dates.
45.
General Accounting Office. The National WIC Evaluation: Reporting and Follow-up Issues. Washington, D.C., December 1989.
46.
MarshallE.USDA admits “mistake” in doctoring study. Science247: 522, February 2, 1990.
47.
BodeJ.BauerG.Letters to the editor. Scientific American, June 1987.
48.
GrahamG.Mothers, not malnutrition, cause infant mortality. Wall Street Journal, April 2, 1991.
49.
LockheadC.Cradle to grave. Insight, May 6, 1991.
50.
LockheadC.Is there really hunger in America?Reader's Digest [reprinted from Insight]. Washington Times, Corp., June 27, 1988.
