Risk is a concept with multiple meanings and is ideologically loaded. The author reviews the literature on risk perception and risk as a sociocultural construct, with particular reference to the domain of public health. Pertinent examples of the political and moral function of risk discourse in public health are given. The author concludes that risk discourse is often used to blame the victim, to displace the real reasons for ill-health upon the individual, and to express outrage at behavior deemed socially unacceptable, thereby exerting control over the body politic as well as the body corporeal. Risk discourse is redolent with the ideologies of mortality, danger, and divine retribution. Risk, as it is used in modern society, therefore cannot be considered a neutral term.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DouglasM.WildavskyA.Risk and Culture. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
2.
StoeckleJ. D.On looking risk in the eye. Am. J. Public Health80: 1170–1171, 1990.
3.
DouglasM.Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, Fall 1990, pp. 1–16.
4.
StarrC.Social benefit vs. technological risk. Science165: 1232–1238, 1969.
5.
ShortJ. F.The social fabric at risk: Toward the social transformation of risk analysis. Am. Soc. Rev.49: 711–725, 1984.
6.
FischoffB.Acceptable Risk. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1981.
7.
NelkinD.Communicating technological risk: The social construction of risk perception. Annu. Rev. Public Health10: 95–113, 1989.
8.
National Research Council Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. Improving Risk Communication. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989.
9.
DandoyS.Risk communication and public confidence in health departments. Am. J. Public Health80: 1299–1300, 1990.
10.
KahnE.A crisis of community anxiety and mistrust: The Medfly Eradication Project in Santa Clara County, California, 1981–82. Am. J. Public Health80: 1301–1304, 1990.
11.
O'RiordanT.Themes and tasks of risk communication: Report of an international conference held at KFA Julich. Risk Analysis9: 513–518, 1989.
12.
OtwayH.WynneB.Risk communication: Paradigm and paradox. Risk Analysis9:141–145, 1989.
13.
TverskyA.KahnemanD.Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science185: 1124–1131, 1974.
14.
SlovicP.Perception of risk. Science230: 280–285, 1987.
15.
De FrieseG. H.FieldingJ. E.Health risk appraisal in the 1990s: Opportunities, challenges, and expectations. Annu. Rev. Public Health11: 401–418, 1990.
16.
FieldingJ. E.Appraising the health of health risk appraisal. Am. J. Public Health72: 337–340, 1982.
17.
KaplanH. B.The sociological study of AIDS: A critical review of the literature and suggested research agenda. J. Health Soc. Behav.28: 140–157, 1982.
18.
NickersonC. A. E.The attitude/behavior discrepancy as a methodological artefact: Comment on “Sexually Active Adolescents and Condoms.”Am. J. Public Health80: 1174–1179, 1990.
19.
TeuberA.Justifying the risk. Daedalus, Fall 1990, pp. 235–254.
20.
DouglasM.CalvezM.The self as risk taker: A cultural theory of contagion in relation to AIDS. Soc. Rev.38: 445–464, 1990.
21.
BrandtA.No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereal Disease in the United States since 1880. Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.
22.
RosenbergC. E.Disease and social order in America: Perceptions and expectations. Milbank Mem. Fund Q. 64(Suppl.): 34–55, 1986.
23.
SontagS.Illness as Metaphor/AIDS and Its Metaphors. Anchor, New York, 1989.
24.
CrawfordR.You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. Int. J. Health Serv. 7: 663–680, 1977.
25.
BeckerM. H.The tyranny of health promotion. Public Health Rev. 14: 15–25, 1986.
26.
MarantzP. R.Blaming the victim: The negative consequence of preventive medicine. Am. J. Public Health80: 1186–1187, 1990.
27.
GraceV. M.The marketing of empowerment and the construction of the health consumer: A critique of health promotion. Int. J. Health Serv. 21: 329–343, 1991.
28.
KilweinJ. H.No pain, no gain: A puritan legacy. Health Ed. Q.16: 9–12, 1989.
29.
McCombieS.The cultural impact of the “AIDS” test: The American experience. Soc. Sci. Med.23: 455–459, 1986.
30.
DouglasM.Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1986.
31.
SapolskyH. M.The politics of risk. Daedalus, Fall 1990, pp. 83–96.
32.
StallingsR. A.Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Soc. Probl.37: 80–95, 1990.
33.
NelkinD.Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. W. H. Freeman, New York, 1987.
34.
KlaidmanS.How well the media report health risk. Daedalus, Fall 1990, pp. 119–132.
35.
StoneD. A.At risk in the welfare state. Soc. Res.56: 591–633, 1989.
36.
ConradP.WalshD. C.The new corporate health ethic: Lifestyle and the social control of work. Int. J. Health Serv. 22: 89–111, 1992.
37.
WilderD.Who should be blamed for being sick?Health Ed. Q.14: 11–25, 1987.
38.
FadenR. R.Ethical issues in government sponsored public health campaigns. Health Ed. Q.14: 27–37, 1987.
39.
MorganM. G.LaveL.Ethical considerations in risk communication practice and research. Risk Analysis10: 355–358, 1990.
40.
FoucaultM.The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon, New York, 1972.
41.
KrokerA.KrokerM.Panic sex in America. In Body Invaders: Sexuality and the Postmodern Condition, edited by KrokerA.KrokerM., pp. 1–18. Macmillan Education, London, 1988.
