Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in the United States. Of the kinds of cancers that can be detected early, it is the only type of cancer that has not shown a decrease in mortality rates. The purpose of this study was to gather information on the perceived barriers to screening for CRC from a primary health care professionals' perspective and to compile a list of suggested strategies to reduce these barriers in Tompkins County, New York. A series of structured group meetings was conducted using a Nominal Group Process (NGP) method for data collection. The most common perceived barriers were (in descending order of importance) reluctance because of fear and/or embarrassment, cost, lack of knowledge, denial, lack of providers' support, and insufficient time. The important suggested strategies to promote screening were community education, health practitioners' support, reduction of cost, better screening, providing time, and social support.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, U.S. Mortality Age-Adjusted Rates, National Cancer Institute, available at: http://canques.seer.cancer.gov, accessed October 22, 2003.
5.
RexD. K.JohnsonD. A.LiebermanD. A.BurtR. W., and SonnenbergA., Colorectal Cancer Prevention 2000: Screening Recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology, American Journal of Gastroenterology, 95, pp. 868–877, 2000.
6.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Recommendation and Rationale, Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, pp. 129–131, 2002.
7.
WinawerS.FletcherR.RexD.BondJ.BurtR.FerrucciJ.GaniatsT.LevinT.WoolfS.JohnsonD.KirkL.LitinS., and SimmangC., Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance: Clinical Guidelines and Rationale—Update Based on New Evidence, Gastroenterology, 124, pp. 544–560, 2003.
8.
Centers for Disease Control, Trends in Screening for colorectal Cancer—United States, 1997 and 1999, MMWR [serial online], 50, pp. 162–166, 2001, available from: Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, accessed April 14, 2004.
9.
WeinrichS.WeinrichM.BoydM.JohnsonE., and StromborgM., Using Elderly Educators to Increase CRC Screening, Gerontologist, 33, pp. 491–496, 1993.
10.
ProhaskaT. R.FunchD., and BleschK. S., Age Patterns in Symptom Perception and Illness Behavior among Colorectal Cancer Patients, Behavior Health Aging, 1,pp. 27–39, 2000.
11.
RileyG.PotoskyA.LubitzJ., and KesslerL., Medicare Payments from Diagnosis to Death for Elderly Cancer Patients by Stage at Diagnosis, Medical Care, 33, pp. 828–841, 1995.
12.
MerrillR.BrownM.PotoskyA.RileyG.TaplinS. H.BarlowW.FiremanB. H., Survival and Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Medicare Patients in Two Group/Staff Health Maintenance Organizations and the Fee-for-Service Setting, Medical Care Research Review, 56, pp. 177–196, 1999.
13.
BrouseC.BaschB.WolfR.ShmuklerC.NeugutA., and SheaS., Barriers to CRC Screening with Fecal Occult Blood Testing in a Predominantly Minority Urban Population: A Qualitative Study, American Journal of Public Health, 93, pp. 1268–1270, 2003.
14.
FarrayeF. A.WongM.HurwitzS.PuleoD.EmmonsK.WallaceM. B.FletcherR. M., Barriers to Endoscopic CRC Screening: Are Women Different from Men?American Journal of Gastroenterology, 94, pp. 341–349, 2004.
15.
JamesA. S.CampbellM. K., and HudsonM. A., Perceived Barriers and Benefits to Colon Cancer Screening among African Americans in North Carolina, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention, 11, pp. 529–534, 2002.
16.
BuschS., Elderly African American Women's Knowledge and Belief about CRC. ABNF Journal [serial online]. 14, pp. 1–16, 2003, available from: The Association of Black Nursing Faculty, Lisle, Ill, accessed September 10, 2004.
17.
DelbecqA. L., The Nominal Group as a Technique for Understanding the Qualitative Dimensions of Client Needs, in Assessing Health and Human Service Needs, BellR. A. (eds.), Human Sciences Press, New York, pp. 191–209, 1983.
18.
LewisJ. D. and AschD. A., Barriers to Office-Based Screening Sigmoidoscopy: Does Reimbursement Cover Costs?Annals of Internal Medicine, 130, pp. 525–530, 1999.
19.
PetersonS. K. and VernonS. W., A Review of Patient and Physician Adherence to CRC Screening Guidelines, Seminal Colon Rectal Surgery, 11, pp. 58–72, 2001.
20.
WoolfS., Overcoming the Barriers to Change: Screening for CRC. American Family Physician [serial online], 61, pp. 1621–1622, 1628, 2000, available from: The American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kans, accessed September 17, 2004.
21.
RathoreS. S.McGreeveyJ. D.SchulmanK. A., and AlkinsD., Mandated Coverage for Cancer-Screening Services: Whose Guidelines Do States Follow?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, pp. 71–78, 2000.
22.
FriisR. H. and SellersT. A., Epidemiology for Public Health Practice (3rd Edition), Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, 2004.
23.
LambN.MarshallA., and BajracharyaS. M., Needs Assessment of Patient Compliance at the Guthrie Clinic, Ithaca, New York, paper presented at: American Association of Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (AAHPERD) National Convention and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, April 25–29, 2006.
