Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The achievement of a group of undergraduate students enrolled in a pilot program for welfare recipients in the form of TANF (Temporary Aid to Needy Families) was compared with the achievement of general population students at an urban community college. Grades attained in a basic level, introductory Psychology course were used to measure academic achievement. Additionally, TANF students' rates of academic retention and election to the Dean's list were compared to rates among the general population community college students, over a period of four semesters. Students in the TANF program attained higher grades in the Psychology course, were elected to the Dean's list at higher rates, and retained their enrollments at equal rates to general population students. The findings suggest that, given proper support, TANF recipients can become successful college students. Implications for the current debate around welfare reform, specifically around the issue of allowing secondary education to substitute for TANF work requirements, are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bane

, & Ellwood

(1994). Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Beatty-Guenter

(1994). Sorting, supporting, connecting and transforming: Retention strategies at community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 18, 113–129.

Blustein

D. L.

Judd

T. P.

Krom

Viniar

Padilla

Wedemeyer

, & Williams

(1986). Identifying predictors of academic performance of community college students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27(3), 242–249.

Canabal

(1994). Hispanic and non-Hispanic white students attending institutions of higher education in Illinois: Implications for retention. College Student Journal, 8(2), 157–167.

Coleman

(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

Cubeta

J. F.

Travers

N. L.

& Sheckley

B. G.

(2000–2001). Predicting the academic success of adults from diverse populations. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 2(4), 295–312.

Harris

(1996). Life after welfare: Women, work and repeat dependency. American Sociological Review, 61, 407–426.

Lens

(2002). TANF: What went wrong and what to do next. Social Work, 47(3), 279–290.

Lunneborg

P. W.

(1975). Interest differentiation in high school and vocational indecision in college. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 297–303.

10.

Mallinckrodt

(1988). Student retention, social support, and dropout intention: Comparison of black and white students. Journal of College Student Development, 29(1), 60–64.

11.

Mouw

, & Khanna

(1993). Prediction of academic success: A review of the literature and some recommendations. College Student Journal, 27(3), 328–336.

12.

Nettles

Thoeny

, & Gosman

(1986). Comparative and predictive analyses of Black and White students' college achievement and experiences. Journal of Higher Education, 57(3), 289–318.

13.

O'Neill

Bassi

, & Wolf

(1987). The duration of welfare spells. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 241–249.

14.

Rendon

(1995). Facilitating retention and transfer for first generation students in community colleges. Paper presented at the New Mexico Institute, Rural Community College Initiative, Espanola, NM, March 1.

15.

Rothman

(1988). Women, welfare and higher education: The Smith College experience. In Ackelsberg

Bartless

, & Buchele

(Eds.), Women, welfare and higher education. Conference paper presented at Smith College, Northhampton, MA, pp. 7–9.

16.

Tinto

(1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17.

U.S. Department of Education (2000). National Center for Education Statistics, 1999–2000 National Post-Secondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS: 2000). Available: www.nces.ed.gov.

18.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Changes in TANF caseloads since 1993. Available: www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/stats/casefam.htm.

19.

Wolf

, & Johnson

(1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(2), 177–185.

20.

Zippay

(2002). Dynamics of income packaging: A 10-year longitudinal study. Social Work, 47(3), 291–300.

Can Welfare Mothers Hack it in College? A Comparison of Achievement between Tanf Recipients and General Population Community College Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References