Although substantial literature exists regarding learning with visuals, most consider text the primary channel with varying amounts of visuals explored as a secondary channel. This study considered the effectiveness of visuals-only procedural guides versus visuals plus added text, using visuals as the primary channel and using visuals developed from screen shots to eliminate the need to create a visual, stand-in vocabulary. There was no difference in the level of successful task completion between treatment groups. The time required to complete the task was measured and there were significant differences in the amount of time required by treatment group, age, and sex. Both treatment groups responded favorably to the procedures on a follow-up attitude questionnaire. Implications of the study and suggestions for further research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlesandriniK. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytical-holistic learning in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 358–368.
2.
AusubelD. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.
3.
BergerJ. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.
4.
BloomB. S.HastingsJ. T.MadausG. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BooherH. R. (1975). Relative comprehensibility of pictorial information and printed words in proceduralized instructions. Human Factors, 17(3), 266–277.
6.
BradshawA. C.JohariA. (2002). Effects of white space in learning via the Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 191–201.
7.
CableS.HarrisN. (1999). Teach yourself PowerPoint 97 visually. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
8.
ChandlerP.SwellerJ. (1992). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
9.
ChaplinE. (1994). Sociology and visual representation. London: Routledge.
10.
CohenP.EbelingB.KulikJ. (1981). A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 29, 26–36.
11.
DeanR. S.EnemohP. A. (1983). Pictorial organization in prose learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 20–27.
12.
DeanR. S.KulhavyR. W. (1981). Influence of spatial organization in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 57–64.
13.
DechsriP.JonesL. L.HeikkinenH. W. (1997). Effect of a laboratory manual design incorporating visual information-processing aids on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 891–904.
14.
DwyerF. M. (1985). Visual literacy's first dimension: Cognitive information acquisition. Journal of Visual/Verbal Languaging5, 7–15.
15.
FischmanG. E. (2001). Reflections about images, visual culture, and educational research. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 28–33.
16.
Guri-RozenblitS. (1988). The interrelations between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts. Instructional Science, 17, 219–234.
17.
HannafinM.RieberL. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies: Part I and Part II. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 91–114.
18.
HolidayW. G.BrummerL. L.DonalsE. L. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 129–138.
19.
KempaR. F. (1985). Assessments in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
LevieW. H.LentzR. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.
21.
PetterssonR. (1999). Information design: An introduction. Eskilstuna: Malardalen University.
22.
SchorrF. (1984). The effects of varying procedural instructions on comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, ED 243 078.
23.
SontagS. (1977). On photography. New York: Farrar-Strauss-Giroux.
24.
StoneD. E.GlockM. D. (1981). How do young adults read directions with and without pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 427–436.
25.
TaggJ. (1993). The burden of representation: Essays on photographies and histories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
WilliamsT. R. (1993). Text or graphic: An information processing perspective on choosing the more effective medium. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23(1), 33–52.
