In the United States many of the cardinal features of primary care are absent. Medical practitioners usually do not provide services to a defined panel of patients and are not distributed according to the extent or type of health needs in the population or to population size. Findings from research indicate the benefits of longitudinally, comprehensiveness, first contact care, and coordination. Some of the new developments in the organization and financing of services may facilitate the attainment of some of these characteristics, but the implementation of even a rudimentary primary care system will require a greater commitment to the training of primary care personnel and better deployment of resources. In the absence of a societal commitment to a health system based upon levels of care and community orientation, a research agenda to determine the benefits and costs of various alternative approaches is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StevensR.Graduate medical education: A continuing history. J. Med. Educ.53: 1–18, 1978.
2.
WechslerH.Handbook of Medical Specialties. Human Sciences Press, New York, 1976.
3.
KnowlesJ.The quantity and quality of medical manpower: A review of medicine's current efforts. J. Med. Educ.44: 81–118, 1969.
4.
RousselotL.Federal efforts to influence physician education, specialization distribution projections and options. Am. J. Med.55: 123–130, 1973.
5.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. A Report to the President and Congress on the Status of Health Professions Personnel in the United States. DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 78-93, Washington, D.C., 1978.
6.
GlandonG.ShapiroR., (eds.) Profile of Medical Practice, 1980. American Medical Association, Chicago, 1980.
7.
American Medical Association. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S., Chicago, 1984.
8.
Bureau of Health Professions. Projections of Physician Supply in the U.S. HRP-0906330 ODAM Report No. 3-85, Hyattsville, Md, March 1985.
9.
Committee on Costs of Medical Care. Medical Care for the American People. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Originally published 1932, reprinted 1970.
10.
BalfeB.McNamaraM.Survey of Medical Groups in the U.S., 1965. American Medical Association, Chicago, 1968.
11.
HendersonS.OdemR.GinsburgK.Medical Groups in the U.S., 1980. Division of Survey and Data Resources, American Medical Association, Chicago, 1980.
12.
MayerT.MayerG.HMOs: Origins and development. N. Engl. J. Med.312: 590–594, 1985.
13.
HaleyM.Positioning Doctors for Convenience Medicine. Hospital and Health Services Administration, July/August 95-110, 1984.
14.
Dawson, Lord, of Penn. Interim Report on the Future Provision of Medical and Allied Services. United Kingdom Ministry of Health, Consultative Council on Medical and Allied Services. Her Majesty's Stationery Offices, London, 1920.
15.
AlpertJ.CharneyE.The Education of Physicians for Primary Care. DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 74-3113. Rockville, Md, 1973.
16.
AikenL.The contribution of specialists to the delivery of primary care: A new perspective. N. Engl. J. Med.300: 1363–1370, 1979.
17.
WeinerJ.StarfieldB.Measurement of the primary care roles of office-based physicians. Am. J. Public Health73: 666–671, 1982.
18.
PuskinD.Patterns of Ambulatory Medical Care in the United States: An Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Doctoral thesis, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Division of Health Care Organization, 1977.
19.
Institute of Medicine. A Manpower Policy for Primary Health Care. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., May 1978.
20.
StarfieldB.Health services research: A working model. N. Engl. J. Med.289: 132–136, 1973.
21.
StarfieldB.Measuring the attainment of primary care. J. Med. Educ.54: 361–369, 1979.
22.
WeinerJ.Baltimore City primary care study: The role of the office-based physician. Maryland State Med. J.31: 48–52, 1982.
23.
BarkerL. R.Program evaluation for residency training in ambulatory care. Submitted for publication, 1985.
24.
LaurenceL.McLemoreT.1981 Summary: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance data No. 88. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 83-1250, Hyattsville, Md, March 16, 1983.
25.
CypressB.Patients' Reasons for Visiting Physicians: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States 1977–8. National Center for Health Statistics. Series 13 No. 56, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 82-1717, Hyattsville, Md., 1981.
26.
McPhersonK.Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: An international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N. Engl. J. Med.307: 1310–1314, 1982.
27.
RutkowI.StarfieldB.Surgical decision making and operative rates. Arch. Surg.119: 899–905, 1984.
28.
KohnR.WhiteK. L.Health Care: An International Study. Oxford University Press, London, 1976.
29.
NorenJ.Ambulatory medical care: A comparison of internists and family-general practitioners. N. Engl. J. Med.302: 11–16, 1980.
30.
FishbaneM.StarfieldB.Child health care in the United States: A comparison of pediatricians and general practitioners. N. Engl. J. Med.305: 552–556, 1981.
31.
LeducD.PlessI. B.Pediatricians and general practitioners: A comparison of the management of children with febrile illness. Pediatrics70: 511–515, 1982.
32.
KramerM. S.ArsenaultL.PlessI. B.The use of preventable adverse outcomes to study the quality of child health care. Medical Care22: 223–230, 1984.
33.
LaporteJ.-R.Drugs in the Spanish health system. Int. J. Health Serv. 14: 635–648, 1984.
34.
GardockiG.McLemoreT.DeLozierJ.The National Ambulatory Care Complement Survey. United States, 1980. National Center for Health Statistics. Series 13 No. 77, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 84-1738, Hyattsville, Md., May 1984.
35.
GeymanJ.Funding patient care, education, and research in family practice: Interrelated system problems. J. Fam. Practice13: 495–496, 1981.
36.
MooreS.MartinD.RichardsonW.Does the primary-care gatekeeper control the costs of health care?N. Engl. J. Med.309: 1400–1404, 1983.
37.
StarfieldB.Special responsibilities: The role of the pediatrician and the goals of pediatric education. Pediatrics71: 433–440, 1983.
38.
RoosN.Who should do the surgery? Tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy in one Canadian province. Inquiry16: 73–83, 1979.
39.
StarfieldB.Costs and benefits to society of primary care education. In Future Developments in Primary Care Education. Contract No. HRSA 240-84-0048. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Health Resources and Services Administration, Washington, D.C., 1984.
40.
National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment. Health Services Research on Primary Care. Rockville, Md., April 1985.
41.
GreenL.The ambulatory sentinel practice network: Purpose, methods, and policies. J. Fam. Pract.18: 275–280, 1984.
42.
Institute of Medicine. Community Oriented Primary Care: A Practical Assessment. Vol. 1, Report of a Study. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., April 1984.
