Dignity under Threat? A Study of the Experiences of Older People in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Theoretical accounts have offered a general understanding of the social significance and importance of dignity and suggest that older age may threaten dignity by structuring and limiting the opportunities for participation and/or social recognition. Micro-sociological research has shown how older people negotiate their identity, in the face of its erosion by the aging body and disability and the domination of health and social care workers. These theoretical approaches inform the study presented here, which explores the meaning and experience of dignity for older people in their daily lives. Older people's accounts were elicited through a series of focus groups with participants living in England and Wales. Participants were selected according to predefined criteria to represent a range of different socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds, levels of fitness, and home circumstances. Personal identity and autonomy were the aspects of dignity most meaningful to the participants, and discussions tended to focus mainly on when personal identity and autonomy were threatened or violated in the context of the provision of health and social care. The authors discuss the extent to which older people's discourse on dignity resonates with the theoretical discourse.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

General Assembly of the United Nations. United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Preamble. 1948. www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.

MaCklin

Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ 327: 1419–1420, 2003.

Nordenfelt

Dignity of the elderly: An introduction. Med. Health Care Phil. 6: 99–101, 2003.

Habermaus

The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System, vol. 2. Beacon Press, Boston, 1987.

Honneth

The struggle for recognition. In The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

Taylor

The Ethics of Authenticity, chap. 12. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

James

The Principles of Psychology. Macmillan, London, 1890.

Sennett

Respect in a World of Inequality. Norton, London, 2003.

Bury

Health, ageing and the life course. In Health, Medicine and Society, ed. Williams

, chap. 4. Routledge, London, 2000.

10.

Philipson

Reconstructing Old Age: New Agendas in Social Theory and Practice, chap. 6. Sage, London, 1998.

11.

Price

, and Ginn

Sharing the crust? In Gender and Ageing, ed. Arber

Open University Press, London, 2003.

12.

Walker

Older people and health services: The challenge of empowerment. In Health and Exclusion: Policy and Practice in Health Provision, ed. Purdy

and Banks

. Routledge, London, 1999.

13.

Oberg

Image versus experience of the ageing body. In Aging Bodies, Images and Everyday Experience, ed. Faircloth

. AltaMira Press. Walnut Creek, CA, 2003.

14.

Twigg

Bathing—The Body and Community Care. Routledge, London, 2000.

15.

Twigg

The spatial ordering of care: Public and private in bathing support at home. Sociol. Health Illness 21(4): 381–400, 1999.

16.

Lawton

Contemporary hospice care: The sequestration of the unbounded body and “dirty dying.”

Sociol. Health Illness 20(2): 121–143, 1998.

17.

Baldock

, and Haddow

Self-talk versus needs-talk. Qual. Ageing Policy Pract. Res. 3(1): 42–48, 2002.

18.

Kidd

P. S.

, and Parshall

Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical right in focus group research. Qual. Health Res. 10(3): 293–308, 2000.

19.

Webb

, and Kevern

Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J. Adv. Nurs. 33(6): 798–805, 2001.

20.

Bloor

Focus Groups in Social Research. Sage, London, 2000.

21.

Kitzinger

, and Barbour

Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In Developing Focus Group Research, ed. Barbour

and Kitzinger

, chap. 1. Sage, London, 1999.

22.

Kitzinger

Introducing focus groups. BMJ 311: 299–302, 1995.

23.

Owen

The practical methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. J. Adv. Nurs. 26(5): 652–658, 2001.

24.

Strauss

, and Corbin

Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.

25.

Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London, 2001.

26.

Blaxter

Health: Key Concepts. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2004.

27.

Isaksen

L. W.

Toward a sociology of disgust. J. Fam. Iss. 23(7): 798–811, 2002.

28.

Caplan

Dignity as a social constraint: Response to Macklin. BMJ, December 27, 2003.

29.

Mills

Davies

, and MaCrae

Care of dying patients in hospital. BMJ 309: 583–586, 1994.