Computer programs for analyzing writing style have grown in number and sophistication over the past decade, and the coming decade will see more and more of them. In order to know the capabilities and limitations of such programs and to decide if any of them are right for you, it is important to understand how they work. In this article, the author draws on his background in computational linguistics to explain how computerized style analyzers accomplish the things that they do.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlareG. R., Assessing Readability, Reading Research Quarterly, No. 1, pp. 63–102, 1974–75.
2.
LanhamR. A., Revising Prose, Scribner's, New York, 1979.
3.
DeGeorgeJ., Style and Readability in Technical Writing, Random House, New York, 1984.
4.
WilliamsJ. M., Style: Ten Lessons in Qarity and Grace, 3rd Ed., Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois, 1989.
5.
StrattonC. R., Technical Writing: Process and Product, Holt, Rinehart, New York, 1984.
6.
StrunkW.Jr. and WhiteE. B., The Elements of Style, 3rd Ed., Macmillan, New York, 1985.
7.
O'MalleyC., Going Beyond Word Processing, Personal Computing, pp. 113–121, December 1985.
8.
RaskinR., The Quest for Style, PC Magazine, pp. 189–207, May 27, 1986.
9.
LewisB. and LewisR., Do Style Checkers Work Word?, PC World, pp. 246–252, June 1987.
10.
CrewL.The Style-Checker as Tonic, Not Tranquilizer, Journal of Advanced Composition, 8:1&2, pp. 66–70, 1988.
11.
SmyeR.Style and Usage Software: Mentor not Judge, Computers and Composition, 6:1, pp. 47–61, November 1988.
12.
DayJ. T.Writer's Workbench: A Useful Aid, but not a Cure-All, Computers and Composition, 6:1, pp. 63–78, November 1988.
13.
Technical Writing: Process and Product, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1984.
14.
(Ed.), Teaching Technical Writing: Cassette Grading (Anthology No. 2), The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, Moorhead, Kentucky, 1979.
15.
Collaborative Writing, Technical Communication, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
16.
Needs Assessment for Communication System Design, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 6:2, pp. 135–144, 1976. Reprinted in A Guide for Writing Better Technical Papers, IEEE Press, New York, pp. 4–12, 1982.
17.
The Electric Report Card: A Follow-up on Cassette Grading, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 5:1, pp. 17–22, 1975. Reprinted in Teaching Technical Writing: Cassette Grading (Anthology No. 2), The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, Moorhead, Kentucky, pp. 24–29, 1979.
18.
Ambiguity: An Exercise in Practical Semantics, Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Communication Conference, Society for Technical Communication, Washington, D.C., pp. 30–34, 1974. Reprinted in Technical Editing: Principles and Practices (Anthology Series No. 4), Society for Technical Communication, Washington, D.C., pp. 47–51, 1975.
