Technical writers and editors assume that readers are generally helped when nominalizations and the weak verbs that accompany them are replaced with the verb form of the nominalization. The study discussed here tests that assumption. Specifically, the study assessed the effect of nominalizations, nominalization imageability, and idea importance on readers' recall of technical prose. The results indicate that denominalized text is most effective in helping native speakers focus on more important information. Yet for non-native speakers, nominalized text may work quite well. Conclusions and recommendations for further study are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WilliamsJ. M., Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity & Grace (5th Edition), Harper Collins, New York, pp. 49–50, 1996.
2.
KollnM., Rhetorical Grammar: Grammar Choices, Rhetorical Effects (2nd Edition), Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, pp. 109–111, 1996.
3.
RiceS., Right Words, Right Places, Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, California, pp. 283–284, 1993.
4.
BostianL. R. and TheringA. C., Scientists: Can They Read What They Write?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17:4, pp. 417–427, 1987.
5.
BostianL. R., How Active, Passive and Nominal Styles Affect Readability of Science Writing, Journalism Quarterly, 60, pp. 635–640, 1983.
6.
BostianL. R. and ByrneT. E., Comprehension of Styles of Science Writing, Journalism Quarterly, 61, pp. 676–678, 1984.
7.
ColemanE. B. and BlumenfeldJ. P., Cloze Scores of Nominalizations and Their Grammatical Transformations Using Active Verbs, Psychological Reports, 13, pp. 651–654, 1963.
8.
ColemanE. B., The Comprehensibility of Several Grammatical Transformations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, pp. 186–190, 1964.
9.
DuffelmeyerF. A., The Effect of Rewriting Prose Material on Reading Comprehension, Reading World, 19:1, pp. 1–16, 1979.
10.
ColemanE. B., Learning of Prose Written in Four Grammatical Transformations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, pp. 332–341, 1965.
11.
RohrmanN. L., The Role of Syntactic Structure in the Recall of English Nominalizations, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, pp. 904–912, 1968.
12.
RohrmanN. L. and PolzellaD. J., Recall of Subject Nominalizations, Psychonomic Science, 12:8, p. 376, 1968.
13.
RohrmanN. L., More on the Recall of Nominalizations, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, pp. 534–536, 1970.
14.
PaivioA., Imagery and Deep Structure in the Recall of English Nominalizations, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, pp. 1–12, 1971.
15.
WearingA. J., Vividness in the Recall of English Nominalizations, Psychonomic Science, 22:2, pp. 121–122, 1971.
16.
RichardsonJ. T. E., Imagery and Deep Structure in the Recall of English Nominalizations, British Journal of Psychology, 66:3, pp. 333–339, 1975.
17.
RichardsonJ. T. E., Imagery, Concreteness, and Lexical Complexity, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, pp. 211–223, 1975.
18.
MeyerB. J. F., Signaling the Structure of Text, in The Technology of Text, Volume Two, JonassenD. J. (ed.), Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey, 1985.
19.
MeyerB. J. F., Text Dimensions and Cognitive Processing, in Learning and Comprehension of Text, MandlH.SteinN. L., and TrabassoT. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1984.
20.
MeyerB. J. F., Organizational Aspects of Text: Effects on Reading Comprehension and Applications for the Classroom, in Promoting Reading Comprehension, FloodJ. (ed.), International Reading Association, Delaware, 1984.
21.
MeyerB. J. F., The Organization of Prose and its Effects on Memory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.
22.
KintschW. A., Reading Comprehension as a Function of Text Structure, in Toward a Psychology of Reading, ReberA. S. and ScarboroughD. L. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1977.
23.
McKoonG., Organization of Information in Text Memory, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, pp. 247–260, 1977.
24.
KintschW. A. and KeenanJ. M., Reading Rate as a Function of the Number of Propositions in the Base Structure of Sentences, Cognitive Psychology, 19, pp. 257–274, 1973.
25.
BrittonB. K.MeyerB. J. F.SimpsonR.HoldredgeT. S., and CurryC., Effects of the Organization of Text on Memory: Tests of Two Implications of a Selective Attention Hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, pp. 496–506, 1979.
26.
IsaksonC. S., The Effects of Nominalizations on Recall and Comprehension, masters thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, 1995.
27.
SpyridakisJ. H. and IsaksonC. S., Nominalizations and Their Impact on Readers, ITCC '96, Proceedings for the International Technical Communications Conference, Seattle, pp. 251–254, 1996.
28.
PalmR., Economic and Communications Theory and Disaster Behavior, in Real Estate Agents and Special Studies Zones Disclosure: The Response of California Home Buyers to Earthquake Hazards Information, University of Colorado, Program on Technology, Environment and Man Monograph #32, 1981.
29.
StycosJ. and DuarteI., Parks, Resettlement, and Population: A Case Study in the Dominican Republic, Society and Natural Resources, 8, pp. 243–260, 1995.
30.
JohnsonR. E., Recall of Prose as a Function of the Structural Importance of the Linguistic Units, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, pp. 12–20, 1972.
31.
SpyridakisJ. H., Signaling Effects: Increased Content Retention and New Answers—Part II, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19:4, pp. 395–415, 1989.
32.
SpyridakisJ. H. and StandalT. C., Signals in Expository Prose: Effects on Reading Comprehension, Reading Research Quarterly, 22:3, pp. 285–298, 1987.
33.
WengerM. J. and SpyridakisJ. H., Reduced Text Structure at Two Text Levels: Impacts on the Performance of Technical Readers, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23:4, pp. 333–352, 1993.
34.
FurmanA. M. and SpyridakisJ. H., The Effect of System-Initiated Advice on the Use of Menu Navigation Shortcuts, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 35:2, pp. 112–119, 1992.
35.
ShubertS.SpyridakisJ.HolmbackH., and ConeyM., The Comprehensibility of Simplified English in Procedures, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25:4, pp. 347–369, 1995.
36.
LiC. Q., A Case Study on the Reliability Analysis of Deteriorating Structures, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Structures and Buildings, 110, August, pp. 269–277, 1995.
37.
MaestripieriD., Assessment of Danger to Themselves and Their Infants by Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Mothers, Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109:4, pp. 416–420, 1995.
38.
SpyridakisJ. H.HolmbackH., and ShubertS. S., Measuring the Translatability of Simplified English in Procedural Documents, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40:1, pp. 217–246, 1997.
39.
SpyridakisJ. H.MillerA., and BarfieldW., Usability Evaluations for Intelligent Transportation Systems, in Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems, BarfieldW. and DingusT. (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 217–246, 1998.
40.
ShubertS.SpyridakisJ. H.HolmbackH., and ConeyM., The Comprehensibility of Simplified English in Procedures, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25:4, pp. 347–369, 1995.
41.
WengerM. J. and SpyridakisJ. H., Reduced Text Structure at Two Text Levels: Impacts on the Performance of Technical Readers, Technical Writing and Communication, 23:4, pp. 333–352, 1993.
42.
SpyridakisJ. H., Conducting Research in Technical Communication: The Application of True Experimental Designs, Technical Communication, 39:4, pp. 607–624, 1992.
43.
SpyridakisJ. H. and WengerM. J., Writing for Human Performance: Relating Reading Research to Document Design, Technical Communication, 39:2, pp. 202–215, 1992.
44.
SpyridakisJ. H. and IsaksonC. S., Hypertext: A New Tool and Its Effect on Audience Comprehension, IPCC91 Proceedings for International Professional Communications Conference, Orlando, Florida, Section 2, pp. 13–21, 1991.
45.
WieringaD. R.BarnesV. E.BranchK. B.WilliamsM. D., and IsaksonC. S., Transportation Issues Management, Users Manual. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, Battelle, Seattle, Washington, 1987.
46.
BarnesV. E.MooreC. J.WieringaD. R.IsaksonC. S.KonoB. K., and GruelR. L., Techniques for Applying Flowchart-Format Emergency Operating Procedures, Final Report, Volumes 1 and 2. Prepared for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Battelle Human Affairs Research Center, Battelle, Seattle, Washington, 1988.
