BrownT. (2011). Journal quality metrics: Options to consider other than impact factors. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 346–350. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.001396.
2.
CraikC. (2012). Reviewing the progress of the British Journal of Occupational Therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 303. doi:1 0.4276/030802212X13418284515712.
3.
FalagasM. E.KournaosV. D.Arencibia-JorgeR.KarageorgopoulosD. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 22, 2623–2628. doi:10.1096/fj.08-107938.
4.
FershtA. (2009). The most influential journals: Impact factor and Eigenfactor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 6883–6884. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903307106.
5.
GarfieldE. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295, 90–93. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
6.
GreenR.DavisC.CorcoranM (2008). Journal impact factors and AJOT. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 7–8. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.1.7.
7.
JohnstoneM. (2007). Journal impact factors: Implications for the nursing profession. International Nursing Review, 54 (1), 35–40. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00527.x.
MingersJ.MacriF.PetroviciD. (2012). Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management. Information Processing & Management, 48, 234–241. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.009.
10.
MoedH. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 265–277. doi:10.1016/j.joi. 2010.01.002.
11.
RodgerS.McKennaK.BrownT. (2007). Quality and impact of occupational therapy journals: Authors' perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54, 174–184. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00595.x.
12.
SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved August 12, 2012, from http://www.scimagojr.com.