Background. Despite occupational therapy's theoretical commitment to community development (CD) approaches, current practice models focus on individual interventions rather than community issues.
Purpose. This research examined three cases of Canadian occupational therapists working in CD to conceptualize CD from an occupational therapy perspective.
Method. Data collection occurred over 12–14 days at each site and included observations, document reviews, and interviews with 14 colleagues and program participants. Constructivist grounded theory informed data analysis.
Findings. A conceptual framework was developed that describes the contextual background to CD initiatives and the strategies used: nurturing community partnerships, building community capacity, influencing health services, and linking sectors. Underlying these strategies was the strategic use of self, which allowed the sharing of power and legitimacy to create opportunities for meaningful occupational engagement.
Implications. The conceptual framework helps articulate CD's underlying processes and can be used to understand and guide practice.
BanksS.HeadB. (2004). Partnering occupational therapy and community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 5–11
2.
BoutilierM.CleverlyS.LabonteR. (2000). Community as a setting for health promotion. In PolandB. D.GreenL. W.RootmanI. (Eds.), Settings for health promotion: Linking theory and practice (pp. 250–307). Thousand OaksCA: Sage
3.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
4.
HammellK. W. (2009). Self-care, productivity, and leisure, or dimensions of occupational experience? Rethinking occupational “categories”. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 107–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1989.tb00178
5.
JacksonT.MitchellS.WrightR. (1989). The community development continuum. Community Health Studies, 13, 66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1989.tb00178.x
6.
LabonteR. (2004). Community, community development, and the forming of authentic partnerships: Some critical reflections. In MinklerM. (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (2nd ed., pp. 88–102). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
7.
LaucknerH.PatersonM.KrupaT. (in press). Using constructivist case study methodology to understand community development processes: Proposed methodological questions to guide the research process. The Qualitative Report.
8.
LaucknerH.PentlandW.PatersonM. (2007). Exploring Canadian occupational therapists' understanding of and experiences in community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 314–325. doi: 10.2182/cjot.07.005
9.
LeclairL. (2010). Re-examining concepts of occupation and occupation-based models: occupational therapy and community development. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77, 15–21. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.1.3
10.
LemorieL.PaulS. (2001). Professional expertise of community-based occupational therapists. Community Occupational Therapy, Education and Practice, 13 (3/4), 33–50. doi: 10.1300/J003v13n03_05
11.
LettsL. (2003). Enabling citizen participation of older adults through social and political environments. In LettsL.RigbyP.StewartD. (Eds.), Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 71–80). Thorofare, NJ: Slack
12.
LysackC.StadnykR.PatersonM.McLeodK.KreftingL. (1995). Professional expertise of occupational therapists in community practice: Results of an Ontario survey. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 138–147
13.
MinklerM.WallersteinN. (1997). Improving health through community organization and community building: A health education perspective. In MinklerM. (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 30–54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers
14.
PolandB.GrahamH.WalshE.WilliamsP.FellL.LumJ. M.KimG. (2005). ‘Working at the margins’ or ‘leading from behind’?: A Canadian study of hospital-community collaboration. Health Social Care in the Community, 13 (2), 125–135
15.
RestallG.RipatJ. (2008). Applicability and clinical utility of the client-centred strategies framework. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75, 288–300
16.
RothmanJ. (1996). The interweaving of community intervention approaches. Journal of Community Practice, 3(3/4), 69–99. doi: 10.1300/J125v03n03_03
17.
RothmanJ.TropmanJ. E. (1987). Models of community organization and macro practice: their mixing and phasing. In CoxF. M.ErlichJ. L.RothmanJ.TropmanJ. E. (Eds.), Strategies in community organizing: Macro practice (pp. 3–26). Itasca, IL: Peacock
18.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford
19.
TownsendE. A.BeaganB.Kumas-TanZ.VersnelJ.IwamaM.LandryJ.BrownJ. (2007). Enabling: Occupational therapy's core competency. In TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J.Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision of health, well-being & justice through occupation (pp. 87–134). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE
20.
TownsendE. A.CockburnL.LettsThibeaultR.TrenthamB. (2007). Enabling social change. In TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J.Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision of health, well-being & justice through occupation (pp. 153–171). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE
21.
TownsendE.A.PolatajkoH. J. (2007). Enabling occupations II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision of health, well-being & justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE
22.
TrenthamB.CockburnL.ShinJ. (2007). Health promotion and community development: An application of occupational therapy in primary health care. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 26 (2), 53–69
23.
WatsonR. M.SwartzL. (2004). Transformation through occupation. Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers
24.
WestmorlandM. G. (1996). The challenge of developing a community partnership model to aid the employment of people with disabilities: The Hamilton Ontario experience. Occupational Therapy International, 3, 18–31. doi: 10.1002/oti.24
25.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
