Development of life story experience (LSE) scales for migrant dentists in Australia: a sequential qualitative-quantitative study

Abstract

The integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches introduces new avenues to bridge strengths, and address weaknesses of both methods.

To develop measure(s) for migrant dentist experiences in Australia through a mixed methods approach.

The sequential qualitative-quantitative design involved first the harvesting of data items from qualitative study, followed by a national survey of migrant dentists in Australia. Statements representing unique experiences in migrant dentists' life stories were deployed the survey questionnaire, using a five-point Likert scale. Factor analysis was used to examine component factors.

Eighty-two statements from 51 participants were harvested from the qualitative analysis. A total of 1,022 of 1,977 migrant dentists (response rate 54.5%) returned completed questionnaires. Factor analysis supported an initial eight-factor solution; further scale development and reliability analysis led to five scales with a final list of 38 life story experience (LSE) items. Three scales were based on home country events: health system and general lifestyle concerns (LSE1; 10 items), society and culture (LSE4; 4 items) and career development (LSE5; 4 items). Two scales included migrant experiences in Australia: appreciation towards Australian way of life (LSE2; 13 items) and settlement concerns (LSE3; 7 items).

The five life story experience scales provided necessary conceptual clarity and empirical grounding to explore migrant dentist experiences in Australia. Being based on original migrant dentist narrations, these scales have the potential to offer in-depth insights for policy makers and support future research on dentist migration.

Keywords

dentists human migration methodology life story experience scales Australia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Balasubramanian

Short

S.D.

(2011a): The Commonwealth as a custodian of dental migratory ethics: views of senior oral health leaders from India and Australia. International Dental Journal 61, 281–286.

Balasubramanian

Short

S.D.

(2011b): Is the concept of ethics misplaced in the migration of Indian trained dentists to Australia? The need for better international co-operation in dentistry. Indian Journal of Dental Research 22, 866–868.

Balasubramanian

,. Brennan, D.S.,Spencer, A.J., Watkins, K. and Short, S.D. (2014): Overseas-qualified dentists’ experiences and perceptions of the Australian Dental Council assessment and examination process: the importance of support structures. Australian Health Review 38, 412–419.

Balasubramanian

Brennan

D.S.

Spencer

A.J.

Short

S.D.

(2015a): ‘Newness-struggle-success’ continuum: a qualitative examination of cultural adaptation process of overseas-qualified dentists in Australia. Australian Health Review 40, 168-173.

Balasubramanian

Brennan

D.S.

Spencer

A.J.

Short

S.D.

(2015b): The ‘global interconnectedness’ of dentist migration: a qualitative study of the life-stories of international dental graduates in Australia. Health Policy and Planning 30, 432–441.

Balasubramanian

Brennan

D.S.

Spencer

A.J.

Watkins

Short

S.D.

(2015c): The importance of workforce surveillance, research evidence and political advocacy in the context of international migration of dentists. British Dental Journal 218, 329–331.

Balasubramanian

Spencer

A.J.

Short

S.D.

Watkins

Chrisopoulos

Brennan

D.S.

(2015d): Characteristics and practice profiles of migrant dentist groups in Australia: implications for dental workforce policy and planning. International Dental Journal 65, 146–155.

Brennan

D.S.

Spencer

A.J.

(2001): Practice belief scales among private general dental practitioners. Australian Dental Journal 46, 186-193.

Brennan

D.S.

Spencer

A.J.

(2008): Development and testing of revised practice belief scales among private general dental practitioners. Australian Dental Journal 53, 217–225.

10.

Carr

L.T.

(1994): The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing? Journal of advanced nursing 20, 716–721.

11.

Cerdin

J.E.

Dine

M.A.

Brewster

(2014): Qualified immigrants’ success: exploring the motivation to migrate and to integrate. Journal of International Business Studies. 45, 151-168.

12.

Child

(2006): The essentials of factor analysis, 3rd edn. London: Continuum.

13.

Cohen

Kahn

Steeves

(2000): Hermeneutic phenomenological research: a practical guide for nurse researchers. London: Sage Publishers.

14.

Creswell

(2003): Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Creswell

Clark

(2010): Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Denzin

and

Lincoln

, Y. (2011): The SAGE handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage: London.

17.

Greene

J.C.

(2008): Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2, 7–22.

18.

Greene

J.C

Caracelli

V.J.

(1997): Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. New directions for evaluation 1997 Spec.Is, 5–17.

19.

Greene

J.C.

Caracelli

V.J.

Graham

W.F.

(1989): Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation eesigns. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11, 255–74.

20.

Hawthorne

(2012): Health workforce migration to Australia. Adelaide: Health Workforce Australia.

21.

Kandelman

Arpin

Baez

R.J.

Baehni

P.C.

Petersen

P.E.

(2012): Oral health care systems in developing and developed countries. Periodontology 2000 60, 98–109.

22.

Kim

J-O.

Mueller

C.W.

(1978): Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. London.

23.

Moffatt

White

Mackintosh

Howel

2006. Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research- what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618]. BMC health services research 6, 28.

24.

Newman

(2013) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th Edn. Pearson Education.

25.

Nunnaly

Bernstein

(1994) Psychometric theory (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

26.

Onwuegbuzie,A.J., Bustamante, R.M. and Nelson, J.A. (2009): mixed research as a tool for developing quantitative instruments. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4, 56–78.

27.

Patton

M.Q.

(1988): Paradigms and Pragmatism. In: Fetterman .D.M. (ed). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution. New York: Praeger.

28.

Pett

Lackey

(2003): Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research.

29.

Productivity Commission (2005): Australia’s Health Workforce: Productivity Commission Research Report. Canberra: Australian Government.

30.

Striener

Norman

G.R.

Cairney

(2015): Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Tashakkori

Teddlie

(2010): Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Weiss

R.S.

(1994): Learning from strangers: the art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.