This descriptive study examined whether a computer-based, repeated reading intervention (i.e., Reading Relevant and Culturally Engaging Stories) is associated with improved reading and social behavior for three primary-aged urban black girls who each showed both academic and behavioral risk. The Reading Relevant and Culturally Engaging Stories intervention utilized culturally relevant reading passages for repeated readings delivered through computer software to increase the reading fluency of the young learners. Single-subject data collection procedures (AB designs) were used to measure student performance in reading and behavior during the intervention. Reading and behavioral outcomes improved following implementation of the intervention for all three participants. The benefits of systematic, intensive, and culturally relevant intervention to reduce risk in beginning learners are discussed.
AlgozzineB., WangC., & VioletteA. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177/1098300709359084
3.
BakerS. K., SmolkowskiK., KatzR., FienH., SeeleyJ., Kame'enuiE., & Thomas BeckC. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low performing high poverty schools.School Psychology Review, 37, 18–37.
4.
BiermanK. L., CoieJ., DodgeK., GreenbergM., LochmanJ., McMohanR., PinderhughesE. & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2013). School outcomes of aggressive-disruptive children: Prediction from kindergarten risk factors and impact of the fast track prevention program.Aggressive Behavior, 39(2), 114–130. doi: 10.1002/ab.21467
5.
BishopR. S. (2007). Free within ourselves: The development of African American children's literature.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6.
BlackM. P., TeppermanJ., & NarayananS. S. (2011). Automatic prediction of children's reading ability for high-level literacy assessment.IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19, 1015–1028.
7.
Bowman-PerrottL., BenzM. R., HsuH., KwokO., EisterholdL. A., & ZhangD. (2011). Patterns and predictors of disciplinary exclusion over time: An analysis of the SEELS national data set.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(2), 83–96. doi: 10.1177/1063426611407501
8.
CartledgeG., & DukesC. (2009). Disproportionality of African American children in special education. In TillmanL. C. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of African American education (pp. 383–398). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
9.
CartledgeG., KeeseyS., BennettJ., GallantD., & RamnathR. (2015). Effects of culturally relevant materials on the reading performance of second-grade African Americans with reading/special education risk.Multiple Voices, 15(1), 22–43.
10.
CartledgeG., KeeseyS., BennettJ., RamnathR., & CouncilM. (2016). Culturally relevant literature: What matters most to primary-aged urban learners.Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 32, 399–426. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2014.955225.
CoyneM. D., Kame'enuiE. J., SimmonsD. C., & HarnB. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First-grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 90–104.
13.
DebnamK. J., PasE. T., BottianiJ., CashA. H., & BradshawC. P. (2015). An examination of the association between observed and self-reported culturally proficient teaching practices.Psychology in the Schools, 52, 533–548. doi:10.1002/pits.21845
14.
DeweyE. N., Powell-SmithK. A., GoodR. H., & KaminskiR. A. (2015). DIBELS Next technical adequacy brief.Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc.
15.
DweckC. S. (2007). The secret to raising smart kids.Scientific American Mind, 18(6), 36–43.
16.
EbeA. E. (2010). Culturally relevant texts and reading assessment for English language learners.Reading Horizons, 50, 193–210.
17.
FinchM. E. (2012). Special considerations with response to intervention and instruction for students with diverse backgrounds.Psychology in the Schools, 49, 285–296. doi:10.1002/pits.21597
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., HamlettC. L., PowellS. R., CapizziA. M., & SeethalerP. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 467–475. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390050701
20.
FuchsL. S., FuchsD., HospM. K., & JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis.Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
21.
GibsonL., CartledgeG., KeyesS., & YawnC. (2014). The effects of a supplementary computerized fluency intervention on the generalization of the oral reading fluency and comprehension of first-grade students.Education and Treatment of Children, 37(1), 25–51.
GoodR. H., KaminskiR. A., DeweyE. N., WallinJ., Powell-SmithK. A., & LatimerR. J. (2013). DIBELS next technical manual.Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. Retrieved from http://dibels.org
24.
Hagan-BurkeS., GilmourM. W., GerowS., & CrowderW. C. (2015). Identifying academic demands that occasion problem behaviors for students with behavioral disorders: Illustrations at the elementary school level.Behavior Modification, 39(1), 215–241. doi: 10.1177/0145445514566505.
25.
Hagan-BurkeS., KwokO., ZouY., JohnsonC., SimmonsD., & CoyneM. D. (2011). An examination of problem behaviors and reading outcomes in kindergarten students.Journal of Special Education, 45(3), 131–148. doi: 10.1177/0022466909359425
26.
HapstakJ., & TraceyD. H. (2007). Effects of assisted-repeated reading on students of varying reading ability: A single-subject experimental research study.Reading Horizons, 47, 315–334.
27.
HudsonR. F., LaneH. B., & PullenP. C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how?The Reading Teacher, 58, 702–714.
28.
Kame'enuiE. J., & SimmonsD. C. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency.Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 203–210.
29.
KaufmanJ. M., & LandrumT. J. (2012). Characteristics of emotional and behavior disorders of children and youth (10th ed.). New York: Pearson.
30.
KempeC., GustafsonS., & SamuelssonS. (2011). Health and disability: A longitudinal study of early reading difficulties and subsequent problem behaviors.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 242–250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00870.x
31.
KimA., VaughnS., KlingerJ. K., WoodruffA. L., ReutebuchC. K., & KouzekananiK. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-assisted collaborative strategic reading.Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235–249. doi: 10.1177/07419325060270040401
32.
KnitzerJ., SteinbergZ., & FleischB. (1990). At the schoolhouse door: An examination of programs and policies for children with behavioral and emotional problems.New York: Bank Street College of Education.
33.
KozleskiE. B., SobelD., & TaylorS. V. (2003). Embracing and building culturally responsive practices.Multiple Voices, 6(1), 73–87.
34.
KuhnM. R., & StahlS. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices.Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.3
35.
LaffeyJ. M., EspinosaL., MooreJ., & LodreeA. (2003). Supporting learning and behavior of at-risk young children: Computers in urban education.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 423–440.
36.
LaneK. L., LittleM. A., Redding-RhodesJ., PhillipsA., & WelshM. T. (2007). Outcomes of a teacher-led reading intervention for elementary students at risk for behavioral disorders.Exceptional Children, 74, 47–70. doi: 10.1177/001440290707400103
37.
LeeC. D. (2008). Synthesis of research on the role of culture in learning among African American youth: The contributions of Asa G. Hilliard, III.Review of Educational Research, 78, 797–827. doi: 10.3102/0034654308320967
38.
LeonardJ., DavisJ. E., & SidlerJ. L. (2005). Cultural relevance and computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 263–284.
39.
LoY., & CartledgeG. (2004). Total class peer tutoring and interdependent group-oriented contingency: Improving the academic and task-related behaviors of fourth-grade urban students.Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 235–262.
National Center for Educational Statistics. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007-064). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
OroscoM. J., & KlingnerJ. (2010). One school's implementation of RTI with English Language Learners: “Referring into RTI.”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 269–288. doi: 10.1177/0022219409355474
PierceM. E., Wechsler-ZimringA., NoamG., WolfM., & KatzirT. (2013). Behavioral problems and reading difficulties among language minority and monolingual urban elementary school students.Reading Psychology, 34, 182–205. doi: 10.1080/02702711.2011.626108
46.
PimpertonH., & NationK. (2014). Poor comprehended in the classroom: Teacher ratings of behavior in children with poor reading comprehension and its relationship with individual differences in working memory.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 199–207. doi:10.1177/0022219412454172
47.
SteeleC. M. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi and other clues to how stereotypes affect us.New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
48.
SutherlandK. S., & SnyderA. (2007). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and self-graphing on reading fluency and classroom behavior of middle school students with emotional or behavioral disorders.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(2), 103–118. doi:10.1177/10634266070150020101
49.
WolfM., & Katzir-CohenT. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention.Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–238.
50.
ZigmondN. (2006). Twenty-four months after high school: Paths taken by youth diagnosed with severe emotional and behavioral disorders, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 99–107. doi:10.1177/10634266060140020601
