Abstract
This article, part 2 of a study that sought to delineate processes leading to good and poor outcomes among individuals who have experienced childhood adversities, uses a life-history interview method to report on three patterns of development found under conditions of adversity: the model of the wounded well, a social-deficits model, and a social-assets model. Some major developmental processes that distinguished those who turned out well from those who did not turn out well were long-term, close personal relationships with peers and adults who modeled prosocial behaviors and values; emotional expressiveness and responsiveness to others; and feeling part of and at home with something outside themselves. This research demonstrates the importance of increasing protective factors and decreasing risk processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
