This study examines the behaviors and attitudes of 324 israeli foster parents toward birth parents and caseworkers. Although the foster parents generally expressed positive attitudes toward both birth parents and caseworkers, their contacts with both were minimal. Most foster parents did not encourage mutual visitation, were generally not involved in the birth parents' lives, and felt that the foster child belonged to them more than to the birth parents. Implications for visitation and reunification are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenbenishtyR., & OysermanD. (1995). Children in foster care: Their present situation and plans for their future. International Social Work, 38, 117–131.
2.
BorgmanR. (1985). The influence of family visiting upon boys' behavior in a juvenile correctional institution. Child Welfare, 64, 629–638.
3.
EastmanK. S. (1982). Foster parenthood: A nonnormative parenting arrangement. Child Welfare, 61, 95–120.
4.
FanshelD. (1982). On the road to permanency: An expanded data base for service to children in foster care.New York: Child Welfare League of America.
5.
FanshelD., & ShinnE. B. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation.New York: Columbia University Press.
6.
FeinE., & MaluccioA. N. (1992). Permanency planning: Another remedy in jeopardy?Social Service Review, 66, 335–348.
7.
FolaronG. (1993). Preparing children for reunification. In PineB. A., WarshR., & MaluccioA. N. (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 141–154). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
8.
GambrillE. D., & SteinT. J. (1985). Permanency planning for children. Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 243–257.
9.
GeanM. P., GillmoreJ. L., & DowlerJ. K. (1985). Infants and toddlers in supervised custody: A pilot study of visitation. journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24, 608–612.
10.
GrigsbyR. K. (1994). Maintaining attachment relationships among children in foster care. Families in Society, 75, 269–277.
11.
HämmigY. (1991). Participation of the birth family in foster care, from the Swiss point of view. International Foster Care Organization Conference, Jönköping, Sweden.
12.
HessP. (1988). Case and context: Determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care. Child Welfare, 67, 311–325.
13.
HessP., & FolaronG. (1991). Ambivalence: A challenge to permanency for children. Child Welfare, 70, 403–424.
14.
HessP., & ProchK. (1993). Visiting: The heart of reunification. In PineB. A., WarshR., & MaluccioA. N. (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 119–139). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
15.
HubbellR. (1981). Foster care and families: Conflicting values and policies.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16.
JaffeE. D. (1982). Child Welfare in Israel.New York: Praeger.
17.
JohnstonE., & GaborP. (1981). Parent counselors: A foster care program with new roles for major participants. In MaluccioA. N., & SinanogluP. A. (Eds.), The challenge of partnership: Working with parents in foster care (pp. 200–208). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
18.
KadushinA., & MartinJ. A. (1988). Child welfare services (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
19.
KaplanZ., & FeinE. (1989). Foster care: Last report or treatment of choice?Child and Youth Services, 12, 187–194.
MaluccioA. N., FeinE., & OlmsteadK. A. (1986). Permanency planning for children.New York: Tavistock.
22.
MaluccioA. N., WarshR., & PineB. A. (1993). Family reunification: An overview. In PineB. A., WarshR., & MaluccioA. N. (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
23.
MechE. V. (1985). Parental visiting and foster placement. Child Welfare, 64, 67–72.
24.
MilnerJ. L. (1987). An ecological perspective on duration of foster care. Child Welfare, 66, 113–123.
25.
Ministry of Labor and Welfare, Israel. (1980). A home for every child.Jerusalem, Israel: Children and Youth Department.
26.
OysermanD., & BenbenishtyR. (1992). Keeping in touch: Ecological factors related to foster care visitation. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9, 541–554.
27.
OysermanD., BenbenishtyR., & Ben-RabiD. (1992). Characteristics of children and their families at entry into foster care. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 22, 199–211.
28.
PasleyK. B., & Ihinger-TallmanM. (1989). Boundary ambiguity in remarriage: Does ambiguity differentiate degree of marital adjustment and integration. Family Relations, 38, 46–52.
29.
PasztorE. M. (1985). Permanency planning and foster parenting. Children and Youth Services Review, 7, 191–205.
30.
PecoraP. J., WhittakerJ. K., & MaluccioA. N. (1992). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice and research.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
31.
PineB. A., WarshR., & MaluccioA. N. (1993). Training for competence in family reunification practice. In PineB. A., WarshR., & MaluccioA. N. (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 35–50). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
32.
ProchK., & HowardJ. A. (1986). Parental visiting of children in foster care. Social Work, 31, 178–181.
33.
RyanP., McFaddenE. J., & WarrenB. L. (1981). Foster families: A resource for helping parents. In MaluccioA. N., & SinanogluP. A. (Eds.), The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 189–199). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
34.
SeabergJ. R. (1981). Foster parents as aides to parents. In MaluccioA. N., & SinanogluP. A. (Eds.), The challenge of partnership: Working with parents in foster care (pp. 209–220). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
35.
SeabergJ. R., & TolleyE. S. (1986). Predictors of the length of stay in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 22(3), 11–19.
36.
SimmsM. D., & BoldenB. J. (1991). The family reunification project: Facilitating regular contact among foster children, biological families, and foster families. Child Welfare, 70, 679–690.
