Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research indicates that kinship care in the child welfare system is increasing each year. Most child welfare agencies, however, do not provide adequate services to relative caregivers. The needs assessment presented here analyzed the service needs of a representative sample of relative caregivers at Lucas County Children Services in Toledo, Ohio. Field interviews were used to gather qualitative data. Results indicated that relatives needed tangible items such as beds, food, and clothing in the initial stages of placement. Ongoing needs included information regarding case progress and system procedures, respite, day care, and counseling for the child. The relatives recommended developing a kinship advisory council to assist the agency in policymaking and a respite program for relative caregivers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Public Welfare Association. (1993). Voluntary cooperative information system: Characteristics of children in substitute and adoptive care, based on FY 81 through FY 89 data. Washington, DC: Author.

Barthel

(1992). For children's sake: The promise of family preservation. New York: Winchell.

Berrick

, Barth

, & Needle

(1993). A comparison of kinship foster homes and family foster homes. In Barth

R. P.

, Berrick

J. D.

, & Gilbert

(Eds.), Child welfare research review (pp. 175–197). New York: Columbia University Press.

Child Welfare League of America. (1994). Kinship care: A natural bridge. Washington, DC: Author.

Dubowitz

(1990). The physical and mental health and educational status of children placed with relatives: Final report. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Dubowitz

, Feigelman

, & Zuravin

(1993). A profile of kinship care. Child Welfare, 71, 153–169.

Gray

, & Nybell

(1990). Issues in African-American family preservation. Child Welfare, 69, 513–522.

Hutchinson

(1993). Mandatory reporting laws: Child protection case finding gone awry? Social Work, 38, 56–63.

National Foster Parent Association. (1991). National foster care facts and figures, Houston, TX: Author.

10.

Scannapieco

, & Jackson

(1996). Kinship care: The African-American response to family preservation. Social Work, 41, 190–196.

11.

Staples

, & Johnson

(1993). Kinship and community supports. In Staples

, & Johnson

(Eds.), Black families at the crossroads: Challenges and prospects (pp. 194–220). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Stehno

(1982). Differential treatment of minority children in the service systems. Social Work, 27, 39–45.

13.

Takas

(1993, December–January). Kinship care: Developing a safe and effective framework for protective placement of children with relatives. Zero to Three, 13, 12–17.

14.

Tatara

(1989). Characteristics of children in foster care. Newsletter of the Division of Child, Youth, and Family Services, 12(3), 3–17.

15.

Thorton

(1991). Permanency planning for children in kinship foster homes. Child Welfare, 5, 593–601.

16.

Wulczyn

, & Goerge

(1992). Foster care in New York and Illinois: The challenge of rapid change. Social Service Review, 66, 278–294.

Service Needs of Relative Caregivers: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References