The authors describe an outcome-oriented approach to case planning in family foster care that builds on a clear agency mission and vision. Its foundation is a set of outcome-oriented goal statements for children and families that focus on their ability to live in the community successfully. Principles for setting developmentally based case goals and milestones toward their achievement are illustrated. A case planning template and how it was Implemented across 23 offices in 13 states are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Humane Association. (1993). First national roundtable on outcome measures in child welfare services.Englewood, CO: Author.
2.
Casey Family Program. (1994). Practice guidelines for clinical practice and case management.Seattle, WA: Author.
3.
CormierW. H., & CormierL. S. (1991). Interviewing strategies for helpers.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4.
CourtneyM. (1995). The foster care crisis and welfare reform. Public Welfare, 53(3), 27–33, 40–41.
5.
KinneyJ. M., HaapalaD. A., & BoothC. (1991). Keeping families together: The Homebuilder's model.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
6.
MaguraS., & MosesB. S. (1986). Outcome measures for child welfare services: Theory and applications.Washington DC: Child Welfare League of America.
7.
MaluccioA. N. (1979). Perspectives of social workers and clients on treatment outcome. Social Casework, 60, 394–401.
8.
MaluccioA. N., FeinE., & OlmsteadK. (1986). Permanency planning for children: Concepts and methods.New York: Methuen.
9.
MaluccioA., & SinanogluP. (1981). The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care.New York: Child Welfare League of America.
10.
McDevittS. (1994). Case records in public child welfare: Uses and a flexible format. Child Welfare, 73(1), 41–55.
11.
MechE. (1994). Foster youths in transition: Research perspectives on preparation for independent living. Child Welfare, 73, 603–623.
12.
ParkerR., WardH., JacksonS., WedgeP., & AldgateJ. (1991). Looking after children: Assessing outcomes in childcare.London: HSMO Books.
13.
RappC. A., & PoertnerJ. (1987). Moving clients center stage through the use of client outcomes. Administration in Social Work, 11(3-4), 23–38.
14.
ReidW. (1970). Implications of research for the goals of casework. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 40, 140–154.
15.
RhodesS. (1977). Contract negotiation in the initial stage of casework. Social Service Review, 51, 125–140.
16.
Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families. (1990). No place to call home: Discarded children in America.U.S. House of Representatives, Report No. 101–395. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
TataraT. (1997, March). U.S. child substitute care flow data and the race/ethnicity of children in care for FY 1995, along with recent trends in the U.S. child substitute care populations. In VCIS Research Notes, 113.Washington, DC: American Public Welfare Association.
18.
TragliaJ. J., MassingaR., PecoraP. J., & PaddockG. (1996). Implementing an outcome-oriented approach to case planning and service improvement. In PecoraP. J., SeelingW. R., ZirpsF. A., & DavisS. M. (Eds.), Quality improvement and evaluation in child and family services: Leadership for tomorrow.Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
19.
TragliaJ. J., PecoraP. J., PaddockG., & WilsonL. (1994). Outcome-oriented case planning.Seattle, WA: Casey Family Program.
20.
WaltonE., FraserM. W., LewisR. E., PecoraP. J., & WaltonW. K. (1993). In-home family-focused reunification: An experimental study. Child Welfare, 72, 473–487.
21.
WellsK., & BiegelD. E. (Eds.). (1991). Family preservation services: Research and evaluation.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
WoodK. (1978). Casework effectiveness: A new look at research evidence. Social Work, 23, 437–458.
23.
WulczynF. H., & GoergeR. M. (1992). Foster care in New York and Illinois: The challenge of rapid change. Social Service Review, 66, 278–294.
