The family assessment wheel is a practical diagrammatic tool for use in therapy. Consistent with social constructionism, it suggests areas for inquiry. It stresses process as well as content, emphasizes family understanding and participation, and converts data gathering into an empowering process of discovery. The tool acknowledges the importance of the family's view of their experience within the context of their culture and community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergerP., & LuckmanT. (1967). The social construction of reality, London: Penguin.
2.
BowenM. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In GuerinP. (Ed.), Family therapy (pp. 42–90). New York: Gardner Press.
3.
BreunlindD., SchwartzR., & MacKune-KarrerR. (1992). Metaframeworks: Transcending the models of family therapy.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
ChessS., & ThomasA. (1977). Temperament and development.New York: Brunner/Mazel.
7.
CushmanP. (1990). Why the self is empty: Towards a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 599–611.
8.
DeanR. (1993). Constructivism: An approach to clinical practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 63, 127–146.
9.
DuhlF. (1969). Intervention, therapy and change. In GrayW., DuhlF., & RizzoN. (Eds.), General systems theory and practice (pp. 397–408). Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
10.
GermainC. (1991). Human behavior in the social environment.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
GoldenbergI., & GoldenbergH. (1996). Family therapy: An overview (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
12.
HartmanA. (1978). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, 59, 465–476.
13.
HillR., & MattessichP. (1979). Family development theory and life span development. In BaltesP., & BrimO. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 161–204). New York: Academic Press.
14.
Imber-BlackE. (1993). Secrets in family therapy: An overview. In Imber-BlackE. (Ed.), Secrets in family therapy (pp. 1–28). New York: W. W. Norton.
15.
LairdJ. (1993). Family centered practice: Cultural and constructivist reflections. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 8(1-2), 77–109.
16.
LairdJ. (1995). Family-centered practice in the post- modern era. Families in Society, 76, 150–162.
17.
LakoffG., & JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
LaxW. (1992). Postmodern thinking in a clinical practice. In McNameeS., & GergenK. (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 69–85). New York: Sage Publications.
19.
MailickM. (1991). Re-assessing assessment in clinical social work practice. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 62(1), 3–19.
20.
MailickM., & VigilanteF. (1987). Human behavior and social environment: A sequence providing the theoretical base for teaching assessment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 1(2), 33–47.
21.
McGoldrickM., & GersonR. (1985). Genograms in family assessment.New York: W. W. Norton.
22.
MinuchinS. (1974). Families and family therapy.Boston: Harvard University Press.
23.
MinuchinS. (1991). The seductions of constructivism. Family Therapy Net-worker, 30(2), 47–50.
24.
NicholsM. (1984). Family therapy: Concepts and methods.New York: Gardner Press.
25.
NicholsM., & SchwartzR. (1991). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
OgdenT. (1986). The matrix of the mind.New York: Jason Aronson.
27.
PareD. (1996). Culture and meaning: Expanding the metaphorical repertoire of family therapy. Family Process, 35, 21–42.
RosenblattP. (1994). Metaphors of family systems theory.New York: Guilford.
30.
SaleebeyD. (1994). Culture, theory and narrative: The intersection of meanings in practice. Social Work, 39, 351–359.
31.
SatirV (1967). Conjoint family therapy (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
32.
TommK. (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Family Process, 16, 167–183.
33.
VigilanteF. (1993). Work: Its use in assessment and intervention with clients in the workplace. In KurzmanP., & AkabasS. (Eds.), Work and well-being: The occupational social work advantage (pp. 179–199). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
34.
VigilanteF., & MailickM. (1988). Needs-resource evaluation in the assessment process. Social Work, 30, 101–104.
35.
WeickA., & SaleebeyD. (1995). Supporting family strengths: Orienting policy and practice toward the 21st century. Families in Society, 76, 141–149.
36.
WhiteM., & EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends.New York: W. W. Norton.