Recent literature on empowerment-oriented social work practice raises intriguing questions about the nature of power in client/worker relationships. This qualitative study explores client and worker perceptions of power in their relationships with each other. Individual and focus group interviews were conducted in residential settings serving men and women with histories of homelessness and psychiatric hospitalization. Staff and residents' experiences with helping relationships were probed, with particular attention to characteristics of mutuality, equality, and power. Client and worker preferences were conceptualized as ranging from partnership-oriented relationships to mentorship-oriented relationships. The author draws on empowerment and feminist theory in analyzing the study simplications for social work practice. The question is posed as to whether social work practice can fully realize the goals of shared power, mutuality, and collaboration associated with feminist and empowerment-oriented practice models when client/worker relationships are embedded in a hierarchical power structure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berman, RossiT., & CohenM. B. (1988). Group development and shared decision making: Working with homeless mentally ill women. Social Work With Groups, 11(4), 63–78.
2.
BretonM. (1994). Relating competence-promotion and empowerment. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 5(1), 27–44.
3.
Bricker-JenkinsM. (1991). The propositions and assumptions of feminist social work practice. In Bricker-JenkinsM., HooymanN. R., & GottliebN. (Eds.), Feminist social work practice in clinical settings, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
4.
BrownL. (1994). Subversive dialogues: Theory in feminist therapy.New York: Basic Books.
5.
BrownK. S., & ZiefertM. (1990). A feminist approach to working with homeless women. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 5(1), p. 6–20.
6.
ChamberlinJ. (1978). On our own: Patient controlled alternatives to the mental health system.New York: Hawthorn Books.
7.
CohenM. B. (1989). Social work practice with homeless mentally ill people: Engaging the client. Social Work, 34, 505–509.
8.
CohenM. B. (1994). Who wants to chair the meeting: Group development and leadership patterns in a community action group of homeless people. Social Work With Groups, 17(1/2), 71–87.
9.
FergusonKathy E. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
FoucaultM. (1965). Madness and civilization.New York: Random House.
11.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
12.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GittermanA. (1989). Testing professional authority and boundaries. Social Casework, 165–71.
14.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine Publishing.
15.
GutierrezL. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work, 35, 149–154.
16.
GutierrezL., DeLoisK., & GlenMayeL. (1995). Understanding empowerment practice: Building on practitioner-based knowledge. Families in Society, 76, 534–542.
17.
HasenfeldY. (1987). Power in social work practice. Social Service Review, 61, 470–483.
18.
JordanJ. V., KaplanA. G., MillerJ. B., StiverI. P., & SurreyJ. L. (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center.New York: The Guildford Press, 81–96.
19.
JordanJ. V. (1991). The meaning of mutuality. In JordanJ. V., KaplanA. G., MillerJ. B., StiverI. P., & SurreyJ. L. (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center.New York: The Guildford Press, 81–96.
20.
LeeJ. (1994). The Empowerment Approach to Practice.New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
LipskyM. (1980). Street level bureaucracy.New York: Russell Sage.
22.
MileyK., O'MeliaM., & DuboisB. (1997). Generalist social work practice: An empowering approach.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
23.
MillerJ. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women.Boston: Beacon Press.
24.
MillerJ. B. (1991). Women and power. In JordanJ. V., KaplanA.G., MillerJ. B., StiverI. P., & SurreyJ. L. (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center.New York: The Guildford Press, 197–205.
25.
MullenderA., & WardD. (1991). Empowerment through social action group work: The self- directed approach. Social Work With Groups, 14(3/4), 125–139.
26.
PalmerS. E. (1983). Authority: An essential part of practice. Social Work, 28, 120–125.
27.
ParsonsR. J. (1991). Empowerment: Purpose and practice principle in social work. Social Work With Groups, 14(2), 7–21.
28.
PinderhughesE. (1989). Understanding race, ethnicity, and power.New York: The Free Press.
29.
PollioD. (1994). Wintering at The Earl: Group structures in the street community. Social Work With Groups, 17(1/2), 47–70.
30.
RappaportJ., ReischlT., & ZimmermanM. (1992). Mutual help mechanisms in the empowerment of former mental patients. In SaleebeyD. (Ed.), The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice.New York: Longman.
31.
RoseS. (1990). Advocacy/empowerment: An approach to clinical practice for social work. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 17(2), 41–51.
32.
RoseS., & BlackB. (1985). Advocacy and empowerment.Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
SaleebyD. (1997). The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice.New York: Longman.
34.
ShepherdL. J. (1993). Lifting the veil: The feminist face of science.Boston: Shambhala Publications, Inc.
35.
SheridanM. J., GowenN., & HalpinS. (1993). Developing a practice model for the homeless mentally ill. Families in Society, 74, 410–420.
36.
SolomonB. (1976). Black empowerment.New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
SurreyJ. L. (1991). Relationship and empowerment. In JordanJ. V., KaplanA. G., MillerJ. B., StiverI. P., & SurreyJ. L. (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center.New York: The Guildford Press, 162–180.
38.
SzaszT. (1970). The manufacture of madness.New York: Harper & Row.
