Although collaboration is ubiquitous to social work, this article is the first to consider “collaboration” as a unifying method for all fields of social work practice and as appropriate to current sociopolitical practice contexts. From interdisciplinary and social work literatures, the authors propose a definition fitting for social work practice and discuss necessary conditions, attributes, and phases, as well as a case example.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonJ. S., & MizrahiT. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41(3), 270–281.
2.
AdamsP., & NelsonK. (Eds.). (1995). Reinventing human services. Community- and family-centered practice.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
3.
AlaszewskiA., & HarrisonL. (1988). Literature review: Collaboration and co-ordination between welfare agencies. British Journal of Social Work, 18(6), 635–647.
4.
ArmitageA. (1993). The policy and legislative context. In WharfB. (Ed.), Rethinking child welfare in Canada, 37–63. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.
5.
BaileyD., & KoneyK. M. (1996). Interorganizational community-based collaboratives: A strategic response to shape the social work agenda. Social Work, 41(6), 602–611.
6.
BembryJ. X. (1995). Project SUCCESS: A model for university-school-community partnership. Social Work in Education, 17(4), 256–62.
7.
BenardB. (1989). Working together: Principles of collaboration. Prevention forum, 10(1), 157–165.
8.
BreakwellG. M., & RowettC. (1982). Social work, the social psychological approach.London: Van nostrand Reinhold.
9.
BrownK., & ChavkinN. F. (1994). Multi-ethnic family-school-community partnerships: Challenge and opportunity for social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 10(1/2), 177–93.
10.
BrunerC. (1991). Thinking collaboratively: Ten questions and answers to help policy makers improve childrenis services.Washington, DC: Education and Human services Consortium.
11.
CallahanM., & WharfB. (1994). The case for removing child abuse and neglect investigations from the mandate of child welfare. In Rethinking social welfare: People, policy, and practice. Sixth Biennial Social Welfare Conference, St. John's, Nfld, 87–108.
12.
CannonI. (1952). On the social frontier of medicine, pioneering in medical social service.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
CannonI. (1923). Social work in hospitals, a contribution to progressive medicine.New York: Russell Sage.
14.
CarrollM. (1980). Collaboration with social work clients: A review of the literature. Child Welfare, 59(7), 407–417.
15.
CastoR. M., & JuliaM. C. (1995). Interprofessional care and collaborative practice.Pacific Grove, California: Cole Publishing.
16.
CohenB. J., & AustinM. J. (1994). Organizational learning and change in a public child welfare agency. Administration in Social Work, 18(1), 1–19.
17.
FarrowF. (1991). Services to families: The view from the states. Families In Society: The Journal Of Contemporary Human Services, 72(5), 268–276.
18.
GermainC. B. (1984). Social work practice in health care: An ecological perspective.New York: Free Press.
19.
GrayB., & WoodD. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3–22.
20.
GrayB. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38(10), 911–936.
21.
HagerdornJ. M. (1996). Forsaking our children: Bureaucracy and reforms in the child welfare system.Chicago: Lake View Press.
22.
HendricksonJ. M., & OmerD. (1995). School based comprehensive services. In AdamsP., & NelsonK. (Eds.), Reinventing human services. Community- and family-centred practice, 145–162. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
23.
HordS. M. (1986). A synthesis of research on organizational collaboration. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 22–26.
24.
JohnsonW. H., McLaughlinJ. A., & ChristensenM. (1982). Interagency collaboration: Driving and restraining forces. Exception Children, 395–399.
25.
KufeldtK. (1991). Foster care: A reconceptualization. Community Alternatives, 3(1), 9–17.
26.
LawsonR., & AndersonP. (1996). Community-based schools: Collaboration between human services and schools as radical educational reform. In HarrisH. S., & MaloneyD. C. (Eds.), Human services: Contemporary issues and trends, 161–172. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
27.
MalickM. D., & ArdytheA. A. (1983). Politics of Interprofessional collaboration: Challenge to advocacy. In WeissmanH. D. H., EpsteinI., & SavageA. (Eds.), Agency based social work: Neglected aspects of clinical practice, 149–154. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28.
MaluccioA. N. (1997). Time for an ideological shift in child welfare? An essay review. Social Service Review, 71(1), 135–43.
29.
MattessichP. W., & MonseyB. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work.St Paul: Wilder Research Center.
30.
NelsonW. H., (1961). The American tory.Oxford: Clarendon.
31.
O'LooneyJ. (1994). Modeling collaboration and social services integration: A single state's experience with developmental and non-developmental models. Administration in Social Work, 18(1), 61–86.
32.
ParsonsR. J., HernandezS. H., & JorgensenJ. D. (1988). Integrated practice: A framework for problem solving. Social Work, 33(5), 417–421.
33.
ParsloeP. (1990). Social work education in the year 2000. International Social Work, 33(1), 13–25.
34.
PecoraP. J., WhittakerJ. K., & MaluccioA. (1992). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research.New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
35.
PeltonL. H. (1990). Resolving the crisis in child welfare. Public Welfare, 48(4), 19–25.
36.
PeltonL. H. (1991). Beyond permanency planning: Restructuring the public child welfare system. Social Work, 36(4), 337–343.
37.
PincusA., and MinahanA. (1973). Social Work Practice: Model and Method.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38.
RodalA., & MulderN. (1993). Partnerships, devolution and power sharing: Issues and implications for management. Optimum Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(3), 27–45.
39.
RuffoloM. C., & MillerP. (1994). An advocacy/empowerment model of organizing: Developing university-agency partnerships. Journal of Social Work Education, 30(3), 310–16.
40.
SchrenzelJ. (1994). The school-community partnership: Helping at-risk youth. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 64(2), 181–91.
41.
SpechtH. (1969). Disruptive Tactics. Social Work, 14(2), 5–15.
42.
SpechtH. (1975). Disruptive Tactics. In KramerR.M., & SpechtH. (Eds.), Readings in Community Organization Practice, 336–348. New York: Prentice-Hall.
43.
SpechtH., & CourtneyM. E. (1994). Unfaithful angels: How social work has abandoned its mission.Toronto: Maxwell Macmillan Canada.
44.
SteinhauerP. (1991). The least detrimental alternative: A systematic guide to case planning and decision making for children in care.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
45.
SubramanianK., SiegelE. J., & GarciaC. (1994). Case study of an agency-university research partnership between a school of social work and a medical center. Journal of Social Service Research, 19(3/4), 145–61.
46.
TaylorC. (1982). Radical tories: The conservative tradition in Canada.Toronto: Anansi.
47.
TowleC. (1945). Common human needs, an interpretation for staff in public assistance agencies.New York: American Association of Social Workers.
48.
TowleC. (1952). Common human needs.New York: American Association of Social Workers.
49.
TowleC. (1969). Helping: Charlotte Towle on social work and social casework.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
TurnerJ. H. (1982). The structure of sociological theory.Georgetown, Canada: Dorsey.
51.
TwelvetreesA. C. (1991). Community work.London: Macmillan.
52.
WeilM. O. (1996). Community building: Building community practice. Social Work, 14(4), 89–102.
53.
WhittakerJ. K. (1991). The leadership challenge in family-based services: Policy, practice, and research. Families in Society, 72(5), 294–300.
54.
WimpfheimerR., BloomM., & KramerM. (1990). Inter-agency collaboration: Some working principles. Administration in Social Work14(4), 89–102.
