While the profession is witnessing growing interest in addressing consumers' spiritual and religious strengths, no studies have explicitly sought to compare the religious values of social workers with those of the general public. This study uses a nationally representative data set, the General Social Survey, to compare the beliefs and practices of graduate-level (n = 53) and bachelor-level (n = 92) social workers with those of the lower, working, and middle classes. The results suggest that the contents of belief systems differ, particularly between graduate workers and the lower and working classes, with social workers being more likely to endorse liberal religious beliefs. Yet, while the belief systems differed, there was little variation in expression, as social workers were roughly as likely to attend services and consider themselves strong adherents of their faith as members of the lower, working, and middle classes. The paper concludes by discussing some of the implications of the difference in belief systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgueA., JohnsonD. R., & WhiteL. K. (1999). Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(3), 423–435.
2.
BabbieE. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). New York: Wadsword.
3.
BergerP. L. (1986). The capitalist revolution.New York: BasicBooks.
4.
BerginA. E., & JensenJ. P. (1990). Religiosity of psychotherapists: A national survey. Psychotherapy, 27(1), 3–7.
5.
BerginA. E., PayneI. R., & RichardsP. S. (1996). Values in psychotherapy. In ShafranskeE. P. (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 297–325). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
BlackP. N., JeffreysD., & HartleyE. K. (1993). Personal history of pscyhosocial trauma in the early life of social work and business students. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(2), 171–180.
7.
Bruce-BriggsB. (1979). The new class?New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
8.
BullisR. K. (1996). Spirituality in social work practice.Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
9.
CandaE. R. (1997). Spirituality. In EdwardsR. L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 299–309). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
10.
CandaE. R., & FurmanL. D. (1999). Spiritual diversity in social work practice.New York: The Free Press.
11.
CarrollM. M. (1997). Spirituality and clinical social work: Implications of past and current perspectives. Arete, 22(1), 25–34.
12.
ClydesdaleT. T. (1999). Toward understanding the role of bible beliefs and higher education in American attitudes toward eradicating poverty, 1964–1996. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(1), 103–118.
13.
CnaanR. A. (1999). The newer deal.New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
CornettC. (1992). Toward a more comprehensive personology: Integrating a spiritual perspective into social work practice. Social Work, 37(2), 101–102.
15.
DavisJ. A., SmithT. W., & MarsdenP. V. (1998). General social surveys, 1972–1998: Cumulative codebook.Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.
16.
DavisN. J., & RobinsonR. V. (1997). A war for America's soul? The American religious landscape. In WilliamsR. H. (Ed.), Cultural wars in American politics (pp. 39–61). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
17.
DerezotesD. S. (1995). Spirituality and religiosity: Neglected factors in social work practice. Arete, 20(1), 1–15.
18.
DiBlasioF. A. (1993). The role of social workers' religious beliefs in helping family members forgive. Families in Society, 74(3), 163–170.
19.
Dor-ShavN. K., FriedmanB., & TcherbonoguraR. (1978). Identification, prejudice and aggression. The Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 217–222.
20.
EhrenreichB. (1990). The professional-managerial class revisited. In RobbinsB. (Ed.), Intellectuals: Aesthetics, politics, and academics (pp. 173–185). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
FellinP. (2000). Revisiting multiculturalism in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2), 261–278.
22.
FurmanL. D., & ChandyJ. M. (1994). Religion and spirituality: A long-neglected cultural component of rural social work practice. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 17(3/4), 21–26.
23.
FurmanL. D., PerryD., & GoldaleT. (1996). Interaction of Evangelical Christians and social workers in the rural environment. Human Services in the Rural Environment, 19(3), 5–8.
24.
GallupG. J., & CastelliJ. (1989). The people's religion: American faith in the 90's.New York: Macmillan.
25.
GallupG. J., & LindsayD. M. (1999). Surveying the religious landscape.Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse.
26.
GartnerJ. D. (1985). Religious prejudice in psychology: Theories of its cause and cure. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(1), 16–23.
27.
GartnerJ. D. (1986). Antireligious prejudice in admissions to doctoral programs in clinical psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17(5), 473–475.
28.
GartnerJ., HarmatzM., HohmannA., LarsonD., & GartnerA. F. (1990). The effects of patient and clinician ideology on clinical judgment: A study of ideological countertransference. Psychotherapy, 27(1), 98–106.
29.
GeniaV. (1994). Secular psychotherapists and religious clients: Professional considerations and recommendations. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(4), 395–398.
30.
GeniaV. (2000). Religious issues in secularly based psychotherapy. Counseling and Values, 44(3), 213–221.
31.
GibelmanM., & SchervishP. H. (1997). Who we are.Washington, DC: NASW Press.
32.
GinsbergL. (1999). Reviewers, orthodoxy, and the passion to publish. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(1), 100–103.
33.
GouldnerA. W. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class.New York: Seabury Press.
34.
HarrisS. M. (1998). Finding a forest among the trees: Spirituality hiding in family therapy theories. Journal of Family Studies, 4(1), 77–86.
35.
HodgeD. R. (1998). Welfare reform and religious providers: An examination of the new paradigm. Social Work & Christianity, 25(3), 24–48.
36.
HodgeD. R. (2000). Spiritual ecomaps: A new diagrammatic tool for assessing marital and family spirituality. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(1), 229–240.
37.
HodgeD. (In press). Does social work oppress Evangelical Christians? A new class analysis of society and social work. Social Work.
38.
HunterJ. D. (1991). Culture Wars.New York: BasicBooks.
39.
HunterJ. D. (1994). Before the shooting starts.New York: The Free Press.
40.
HusainiB. A., MooreS. T., & CainV. A. (1994). Psychiatric symptoms and help-seeking behavior among the elderly: An analysis of racial and gender differences. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21(3), 177–195.
41.
JafariM. F. (1993). Counseling values and objectives: A comparison of western and Islamic perspectives. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 10(3), 326–339.
42.
JosephM. V. (1988). Religion and social work practice. Social Casework, 69(7), 443–452.
43.
KuhnT. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
44.
LarsonD., MilanoG. M., & LuF. (1998). Religion and mental health: The need for cultural sensitivity and synthesis. In OkpakuS. O. (Ed.), Clinical methods in transcultural psychiatry (pp. 191–210). Washington, DC: American Psychiatry.
45.
LehmanE. C. (1974). Academic discipline and faculty religiosity in secular and church-related colleges. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13(2), 205–220.
46.
LindseyD. B., & HeerenJ. (1992). Where the sacred meets the profane: Religion in the comic pages. Review of Religious Research, 34(1), 63–77.
47.
MaslowA. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being.Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.
48.
MatthewsM. D., & WeaverC. N. (1989). What college professors want from a job. Psychological Reports, 65, 792–794.
49.
McAdamsJ. (1987). Testing the theory of the new class. The Sociological Quarterly, 28(1), 23–49.
50.
MusickM. A., KoenigH. G., LarsonD. B., & MatthewsD. (1998). Religion and spiritual beliefs. In HollandJ. C. (Ed.), Pycho-oncology (pp. 780–789). New York: Oxford University Press.
NeumannJ. K., HarvillL. M., & CallahanM. (1995). Impact of humanistic, liberal Christian, and Evangelical Christian values on the self-reported opinions of radiologists and psychiatrists. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 23(3), 198–207.
53.
NeumannJ. K., & LeppienF. V. (1997). Impact of religious values and medical specialty on professional inservice decisions. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25(4), 437–448.
54.
NeumannJ. K., ThompsonW., & WoolleyT. W. (1992). Evangelical vs. liberal Christianity: The influence of values on the nonclinical professional decisions of social workers. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11(1), 57–67.
55.
PargamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping.New York: Guilford Press.
56.
PellebonD. A. (2000). Perceptions of conflict between Christianity and social work: A preliminary study. Social Work and Christianity, 27(1), 30–39.
57.
PerkinsH. W. (1984). Religious content in American, British, and Canadian popular publications from 1937 to 1979. Sociological Analysis, 45(2), 159–165.
58.
ReedR. (1996). Active Faith.New York: The Free Press.
59.
ResslerL. E. (1998). When social work and Christianity conflict. In HugenB. (Ed.), Christianity and social work (pp. 165–186). Botsford, CT: North American Association of Christians in Social Work.
60.
ResslerL. E., & HodgeD. R. (1999, March). Religious discrimination in social work: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the 45th Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education. San Francisco.
61.
RichardsP. S., & BerginA. E. (1997). A spiritual strategy.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62.
RichardsP. S., RectorJ. M., & TjeltveitA. C. (1999). Values, spirituality, and psychotherapy. In MillerW. R. (Ed.), Integrating spirituality into treatment (pp. 133–160). Washington: American Psychological Association.
63.
SchmalzbauerJ. (1993). Evangelicals in the new class: Class versus subcultural predictors of ideology. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(4), 330–342.
64.
Schwartz-BarcottD., & SchwartzT. P. (1988). How nurses vote. American Journal of Nursing, 88(9), 1191–1193.
65.
Schwartz-BarcottD., & SchwartzT. P. (1990). Are nurses healthier and happier than the general public?Nursing Forum, 25(4), 19–24, 34.
66.
SermabeikianP. (1994). Our clients, ourselves: The spiritual perspective and social work practice. Social Work, 39(2), 178–183.
67.
SewallG. T. (1995). Religion in the classroom: What the textbooks tell us.New York: American Textbook Council.
68.
SheridanM. J., & Amato-von HemertK. (1999). The role of religion and spirituality in social work education and practice: A survey of student views and experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1), 125–141.
69.
SheridanM. J., BullisR. K., AdcockC. R., BerlinS. D., & MillerP. C. (1992). Practitioners' personal and professional attitudes and behaviors toward religion and spirituality: Issues for education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 28(2), 190–203.
70.
SheridanM. J., WilmerC. M., & AtchesonL. (1994). Inclusion of content on religion and spirituality in the social work curriculum: A study of faculty views. Journal of Social Work Education, 30(3), 363–376.
71.
SkillT., & RobinsonJ. D. (1994). The image of Christian leaders in fictional television programs. Sociology of Religion, 55(1), 75–84.
72.
SmithT. W. (1990). Classifying Protestant denominations. Review of the Religious Research, 31(3), 225–245.
73.
StocktonR. (1994). Ethnic archetypes and the Arab image. In McCarusE. (Ed.), The development of Arab-American identity (pp. 119–153). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
74.
SzelenyiI., & MartinB. (1991). The three waves of new class theories and a postscript. In LemertC. C. (Ed.), Intellectuals and politics (pp. 19–30). London: Sage.
75.
VitzP. C. (1985). Religion and traditional values in public school textbooks: An empirical study.Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
76.
WambachK. G., & Van SoestD. (1997). Oppression. In EdwardsR. L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 243–252). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
77.
WolfeA. (1998). One nation, after all.New York: Viking.
